• Using Olcott's system to prove that Trump lied about election fraud

    From olcott@polcott333@gmail.com to sci.logic,sci.math,comp.theory,comp.ai.philosophy on Tue May 19 15:26:36 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.theory

    On 5/17/2026 4:08 AM, Mikko wrote:
    On 16/05/2026 13:16, olcott wrote:

    There is no evidence of election fraud

    So you say but can't prove.

    and there is
    much evidence that Trump is lying about election fraud
    using Hilter's own system of lies therefore rational
    minds would conclude that the evidence supports Trump
    is lying about election fraud though fascist methods.

    Irrelevant to the question whether there was an undetected election
    fraud. Trump obviously can't know about the fraud if it is undetected.


    In other words:
    *Trump's claims about election fraud are baseless*
    *Trump's claims about election fraud are baseless*
    *Trump's claims about election fraud are baseless*

    It can be proved with complete logical certainty that
    there was no actual evidence ever presented that showed
    any election fraud that could have possibly changed
    the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

    It can be proved "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Trump
    exactly copied the method of Hitler's " big lie" in his
    lies about election fraud.
    --
    Copyright 2026 Olcott

    My 28 year goal has been to make
    "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"
    reliably computable for the entire body of knowledge.
    The complete structure of this system is now defined.

    The entire body of knowledge expressed in language is
    comprised of two types of relations between finite strings:
    (a) *Axioms* Expressions of language that are stipulated to be true.
    (b) *Inference Rules* Expressions of language that are semantically
    entailed syntactically from (a) and/or (b).
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2