Nope, everything he said is true. Very true.
On 31 Jan 2024 22:56:07 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:
Nope, everything he said is true. Very true.
I provided URLs which proved it.
iMessage is an Apple product
that Android users want to use without owning an Apple device.
On 1 Feb 2024 02:06:58 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:
iMessage is an Apple product
that Android users want to use without owning an Apple device.
No. You still can't seem to comprehend that they're on Android.
They're not on an iPhone.
They don't want an iPhone.
If they did want an iPhone, they'd buy an iPhone.
But they don't want an iPhone.
In fact, they don't want anything whatsoever to do with the iPhone.
What some people want to use is the Apple messages mainframe server.
Which allows those people to send MMS attachments over the Internet.
Because they have a crappy carrier that charges them for MMS attachments. Just like they want the WhatsApp servers (which most of Europe uses).
What they want are the WhatsApp servers (& the people they reach).
And they want the Apple messaging servers (& the people they reach).
You'll never understand that because you're desperate to find something (anything) redeeming in the iPhone itself (which is just a dumb terminal).
On 1 Feb 2024 02:06:58 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:
iMessage is an Apple product that Android users want to use without
owning an Apple device.
What some people want to use is the Apple messages mainframe server.
Which allows those people to send MMS attachments over the Internet.
Because they have a crappy carrier that charges them for MMS
attachments.
They want to use the iMessage messaging service, which is an Apple
product. They could use WhatsApp, Signal, or any number of other
messaging services,
Which allows those people to send MMS attachments over the Internet.
You're ignorant. MMS messages are inherently *not* sent over the
internet, but over cellular networks.
On 1 Feb 2024 05:25:54 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:
They want to use the iMessage messaging service, which is an Apple
product. They could use WhatsApp, Signal, or any number of other
messaging services,
It's good you finally figured it out that they don't want to use the
iPhone
but just the mainframe server that Apple uses to communicate with
iPhones.
I just wish you'd have figured that out fifty posts ago
Which allows those people to send MMS attachments over the Internet.
You're ignorant. MMS messages are inherently *not* sent over the
internet, but over cellular networks.
When I send an MMS attachment, it goes over my carrier's cellular
network.
But when _they_ send an MMS attachment, they don't want it to work
that way (because they're charged when the carrier sends the MMS
attachment).
They want the MMS to be sent over the Internet
Are you saying it doesn't work that way for those trying to send an
MMS attachment NOT through their carrier but through Apple's Internet servers?
You've been completely wrong this entire thread
You like to try to misrepresent what people say to build
your little straw men, but adults see right through that childish game.
but just the mainframe server that Apple uses to communicate with
iPhones.
No, they want to use the iMessage service. And the fact that you think iMessage is run on one server says all we need to know about your
knowledge in this area. You're clueless as usual.
I just wish you'd have figured that out fifty posts ago
Projection. You are the one who started baselessly claiming this was
about iPhones fifty posts ago, and several people have called you out on
it from the beginning. You're not fooling anyone here.
Which allows those people to send MMS attachments over the Internet.
You're ignorant. MMS messages are inherently *not* sent over the
internet, but over cellular networks.
When I send an MMS attachment, it goes over my carrier's cellular
network.
Duh. That's what I said.
But when _they_ send an MMS attachment, they don't want it to work
that way (because they're charged when the carrier sends the MMS
attachment).
They want the MMS to be sent over the Internet
Nope. They aren't interested in SMS or MMS.
And they aren't interested
in WhatsApp, Signal, or other internet messaging apps.
They want to use
iMessage, but without an Apple device, which is in violation of the
terms of service. You are *desperate* to move the goal post, but it is
firmly planted in the ground.
Are you saying it doesn't work that way for those trying to send an
MMS attachment NOT through their carrier but through Apple's Internet
servers?
Get this through your incredibly thick head: SMS and MMS are not
internal technologies. Never have been. Never will be.
You've been completely wrong this entire thread
Projection from a mental weakling.
On 1 Feb 2024 15:51:15 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:
You like to try to misrepresent what people say to build your little
straw men, but adults see right through that childish game.
The fact that you were wrong the entire time
you're so angry.
It's not my fault you didn't get the logic that the people using
Beeper were on Android phones (even though that was obvious to
everyone else).
but just the mainframe server that Apple uses to communicate with
iPhones.
No, they want to use the iMessage service. And the fact that you
think iMessage is run on one server says all we need to know about
your knowledge in this area. You're clueless as usual.
The service runs on mainframe servers
Apple designed iPhones using dumb terminal
I just wish you'd have figured that out fifty posts ago
Projection. You are the one who started baselessly claiming this was
about iPhones fifty posts ago, and several people have called you out on
it from the beginning. You're not fooling anyone here.
What's revealing is you finally figured out, after fifty posts, that
Android users are on Android because they don't want to be on the iPhone
Earth to Jolly Roger. They're using Beeper with Android because they expressly do not want to have anything to do with the iPhone. Idiot.
But when _they_ send an MMS attachment, they don't want it to work
that way
They want the MMS to be sent over the Internet
Nope. They aren't interested in SMS or MMS.
Here's where you're again wrong. They don't want the iPhone.
What some people (who have crappy carrier plans) want is to use the Apple mainframe servers to send MMS attachments over the Internet without being charged by the carrier for those MMS attachments.
And they aren't interested in WhatsApp, Signal, or other internet
messaging apps.
the dumb terminal model the iPhone uses is no different from the same
model that WhatsApp uses.
They want to use iMessage, but without an Apple device, which is in
violation of the terms of service. You are *desperate* to move the
goal post, but it is firmly planted in the ground.
None of them want iMessage.
It was always the Apple users who were left out
Get this through your incredibly thick head: SMS and MMS are not
internal technologies. Never have been. Never will be.
What you still don't understand, even after fifty posts, is that what those people want (who are charged for MMS attachments) is to send MMS over the Internet (which is what Beeper tried to allow those people to do).
Android users are desperate to use Apple servers
without owning Apple products.
It's not my fault you didn't get the logic that the people using
Beeper were on Android phones (even though that was obvious to
everyone else).
Unfortunately you're wrong, and you have zero credibility.
The service runs on mainframe servers
Nope, just servers.
Apple designed iPhones using dumb terminal
Bullshit.
iPhones are much more powerful than dumb terminals.
One clear
example is the inclusion of the A-series neural engine which allows developers to use the Core ML and other frameworks to do on-device
machine learning, where many of Apple's competitors use cloud-based
machine learning processing which makes them more deserving of the term
dumb terminal and also compromise the privacy of their users. You're desperately making these outright lies as if you think the rest of us
are just as dumb and gullible as you are, but those juvenile antics
won't work here.
I just wish you'd have figured that out fifty posts ago
Projection. You are the one who started baselessly claiming this was
about iPhones fifty posts ago, and several people have called you out on >>> it from the beginning. You're not fooling anyone here.
What's revealing is you finally figured out, after fifty posts, that
Android users are on Android because they don't want to be on the iPhone
The fact that you think this isn't blatantly obvious to everyone here is telling and says way more about you than anyone else.
Earth to Jolly Roger. They're using Beeper with Android because they
expressly do not want to have anything to do with the iPhone. Idiot.
They want to use a messaging service that is *exclusive* to Apple
products.
But when _they_ send an MMS attachment, they don't want it to work
that way
No matter how hard you try, nothing you say changes the fact that this
isn't about SMS/MMS.
On 3 Feb 2024 01:07:53 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:
Android users are desperate to use Apple servers
without owning Apple products.
I'll agree
Sysop: | DaiTengu |
---|---|
Location: | Appleton, WI |
Users: | 991 |
Nodes: | 10 (2 / 8) |
Uptime: | 75:44:39 |
Calls: | 12,949 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 186,574 |
Messages: | 3,264,527 |