tell me what is the obsession with this snit poster? From cross posts
in alt.home.repair and comp.sys.mac.advocacy, both of which I lurk in,
snit seems to be mentally retarded, at least from what I have read.
He or she doesn't seem to be a troll but more of an ill informed poster.
I do have one direct question for you Linuxiac and that is why do you seemingly have the same ASCII art X-Face of a chicken as snit does?
On 09/03/2026 21:51, Glock wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<n14oilFhffkU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$1@apd.eternal-september.org>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but nothing >>>>>> concerning.
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say should not >>>> be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing.
Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing
an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they >>>> push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense. They
are basically MAGA and think like them: it is about tribalism and
scapegoating to them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below. I
suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person you
will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has never lied >> to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get pointed >> out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government regarding
disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where snit
admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various Linux
groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters like Marek >> Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills to
research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job manage
to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of messages at all
hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare or
something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to Usenet
while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a side business,
failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home businesses were legit
and paying taxes as long as they, especially the daycare, was licensed
which it was not and why it was shut down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long before
Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his
Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the
competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly took
their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the names
were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer Guy and >> the other business started to receive complaints for computers they never
tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people called
that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest.
You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser altering
his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin among
others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had zero chance of >> repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's vast
knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing
an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened.
Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods.
That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to get
into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but Glasser >> claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they
push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at
various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like Las
Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY publicly
viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up to
harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a number of
years which depends upon the particular court at which point they are
purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because they
are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these still
show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the
incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was screenshot
by numerous people and removed from the public website because despite
being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth, a settlement between
the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the books,
not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially married >> but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
Provide *EVIDENCE* of any claim and I will investigate.
On 2026-03-09, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
DB is not *THAT* stupid. Snit is still a useful idiot for him so he
hasn't tossed him under the bus.
*Yet*.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below. I
suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person you
will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has never
lied to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
DB will deny everything, ignore common sense and logic and demand
further proof.
Snit will probably call you and everyone else a sock.
I have snit at -9999 so I only see replies.
And of course snit the troll who prides himself as providing receipts willnever provide receipts to
prove someone is a sock.
It's how snit's diseased brain functions.
Bizarre isn't it?
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various Linux
groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters like
Marek Novotny for example.
Not counting snit's floodbot.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills to
research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job
manage to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of messages
at all hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Unless his job is being paid to troll, of course it's not possible.
How does one stay up half the night and then get up to go to a job in
the morning?
Those snit drug cocktails will only work to a point and then only for a while.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare
or something like that.
Well, to his credit at least he did try to go into business for himself.
But having a guaranteed government income does help.
It's not like quitting your job at Exxon to start a house cleaning
business where you no longer have the income from Exxon to rely on.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to Usenet
while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a side
business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home businesses
were legit and paying taxes as long as they, especially the daycare,
was licensed which it was not and why it was shut down.
There are a lot of businesses in the underground economy.
However choosing a business like child care which requires insurance and associated documentation is not a business to start if you want to
remain in the underground economy.
Are you beginning to understand now?
DB has understood from day one.
He's manipulated snit into his very own useful idiot.
And of course snit took the bait.
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long before
Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
True.
Search COLA and you will find numerous people who confirmed the snit discount.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his
Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the
competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly took
their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the names
were similar.
It was a brilliant marketing strategy IMHO.
It's right out of the movie "Miracle on 34th Street" where if Macy's department store didn't stock a particular item, they sent the customer
to Gimbels department store which was their main competitor at the time.
They had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer Guy
and the other business started to receive complaints for computers they
never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
Makes sense.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people
called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
True.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest.
You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser altering
his version of the story he tells.
That's one of snit's go to tricks.
He assumes that people are too ignorant to notice.
He is wrong.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin
among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had zero
chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Obviously a total waste of time.
That's why snit is -9999.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's vast
knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a computer.
Same.
Gremlin complimented me on cleaning a rather nasty virus from a friend's Windows PC and it meant a lot to me.
I don't even run Windows! Common
sense and a well at that time did not detect it.
Gremlin knows his stuff and applies his diagnostic troublshooting skills across platforms.
that kind of knowledge cannot be learned from a book. It's experience
coupled with a mind that is able to think analytically.
Neither of which snit possess which is why he so obviously jealous of
Gremlin and Steve Carroll as well.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
He will run away.
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
confusing an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened.
Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods.
That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to
get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet
boot.
That is correct.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but
Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
Correct again.
Can you imagine a person running a business offering repairs of
computers who has no clue how to boot into recovery mode?
That's like someone opening up an auto repair business and is asking
"what are these numbers on my wrenches ?".
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
Run DB, run!
You are no Forest Gump though.
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they
push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at
various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like Las
Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY
publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up to
harm him.
At first snit attempted to spin it claiming Usenet isn't an accurate
source of information while ignoring that the official court website was posted and it was a .gov site so unlikely to be fake.
Snit is simply a dishonest piece of shit.
It's what he is.
There is no other explanation for his behavior.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a number
of years which depends upon the particular court at which point they
are purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because they
are considered public record.
This is true and has been explained to snit many times already.
Aside from his divorce and haressment in public criminal arrest, the
majority of snit's court cases are multitudes of traffic violations.
Mostly for speeding and not having active insurance or financial responsibility.
Same as the childcare business he ran out of his trailer. For someone
who claims to be honest and honorable he sure breaks the law a lot.
Here is AZ policy.
<https://share.google/aimode/2PECv8mjLbC8qd4MF>
"Traffic violations generally remain on Arizona public court websites
and motor vehicle records for three to five years, though points for
those violations are officially active for only 1 year. More serious, criminal violations (e.g., DUI, reckless driving) may remain accessible
on court records for a longer period."
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these
still show up.
Several people have done this.
However, in order to obtain the documents one has to agree to not post
them publicly and they are somehow watermarked so it's not a good idea.
Besides nothing further is required as a decent background check reveals snit's sordid criminal history.
In truth, snit should not be allowed to get behind the wheel of a car.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the
incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
Snit is tossing whatever he can at the wall and trying to conflate the
issue. Enough honest people took screenshots or viewed the original
files to debunk snit's lame claims.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was
screenshot by numerous people and removed from the public website
because despite being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth, a
settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it was
rightfully removed.
Correct.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
Here is another one snit keeps pushing:
'Snit, Where is Your Proof That Carroll Claimed The Police Visited Him?'
https://groups.google.com/g/talk.politics.guns/c/BpDIKI3GVn0/m/Zc1f0gBMAw
AJ
Read through this one to see how many times snit has changed his story.
It's hilarious!
Why snit continues to make a fool of himself in public remains a mystery though.
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below. I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person you
will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has never lied to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government regarding disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where snit admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various Linux groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters like Marek Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job manage
to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of messages at all
hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare or something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to Usenet
while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home businesses were legit
and paying taxes as long as they, especially the daycare, was licensed
which it was not and why it was shut down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly took their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the names
were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer Guy and the other business started to receive complaints for computers they never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest.
You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser altering
his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing
an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened. Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods.
That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they
push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at
various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up to
harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a number of years which depends upon the particular court at which point they are
purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because they
are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these still show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was screenshot
by numerous people and removed from the public website because despite
being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth, a settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the books, not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially married but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
Notice how you lie your ass off. I bring receipts.
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Pothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point. She may
not call herself that, but her language repeats the same themes found in "Great Replacement" and ethnonationalist propaganda. A few examples:
Each of these aligns directly with extremist talking points documented
by anti-hate researchers. Together they form the same structure:
immigrants as invaders, elites as traitors, "real" citizens as victims. That's white-supremacist rhetoric whether she admits it or not.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> news:69b0c8ba$2$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Wed, 11 Mar 2026 01:43:22
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Notice how you lie your ass off. I bring receipts.
No lies were written about you. Everything above can and has been
fact checked many times Snit.
The so called receipts are actually
further proof of your very dishonest nature and serious struggle
with reading comprehension.
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
None of those posts support your accusation of Pothead being a white supremacist.
They do not show support of your additional dishonest on your part claim of them attacking you for being a jew, either.
Glock <glock@localhost.com> news:69af40de$0$8464$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Mon, 09 Mar 2026 21:51:26 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
Might I suggest the possibility of it being a combination of the two?
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below. I
suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person you
will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has never lied >> to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get pointed >> out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government regarding
disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where snit
admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various Linux
groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters like Marek >> Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills to
research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job manage
to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of messages at all
hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
I know David well enough to be able to state that he isn't about to acknowledge what you wrote there, let alone respond to it. :)
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare or
something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to Usenet
while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a side business,
failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home businesses were legit
and paying taxes as long as they, especially the daycare, was licensed
which it was not and why it was shut down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
I'm sure he actually does understand, but, is going to continue to turn a blind eye to it.
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long before
Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
Yep! Long before I ever mentioned having called the shop and asked them
about the snit discount. Years prior, infact.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his
Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the
competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly took
their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the names
were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer Guy and >> the other business started to receive complaints for computers they never
tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people called
that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
Not only is he denying it, he's trying to very dishonestly claim that I'm
the one who made the accusation in the first place. As if I was the only one. No sir. Others already did that years before me.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest.
You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
He's not about to confirm anything concerning Snit. Not in public.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser altering
his version of the story he tells.
Yep!
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin among
others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had zero chance of >> repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Yep!
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's vast
knowledge offering to assist me.
Damn! Thanks man. That means a lot to me!
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
I'm cheating because I've already read his reply, but, even if I didn't, I already know he'd opt for the latter and run as fast as his drunkard ass could without tripping and falling too much. Okay, so maybe not running, maybe staggering? :)
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing
an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened.
Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods.
That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to get
into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but Glasser >> claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
I didn't confuse anything, either. <G> Snit was the one repeatedly doing
that in the thread. Efforts to stall me from reaching my diagnosis I suspect. He was hoping that I'd give up and not reach an accurate diagnosis. He was attempting to convince me to do that by inviting everyone else to
participate when it wasn't necessary and was actually getting in the way of things. Any tech knows that one tech per job unless that tech asks for a 2nd pair of eyeballs on it. There's a reason for this and anyone who's done this for a living knows it. And why it exists. As snit demonstrated with his efforts, it just muddles things up and slows the diagnosis process down.
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
The latter, again.
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they
push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at
various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like Las
Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY publicly
viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up to
harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a number of
years which depends upon the particular court at which point they are
purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because they
are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these still
show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the
incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
I am one of several people who provided David step by step instructions to confirm the contents did come from an arizona government website and were some of snits legal court cases. A walk thru. Step by step instructions.
Back when they were still available from the website. David is in complete denial to claim otherwise or dismiss what you wrote - which is what he's opted to do with his reply.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was screenshot
by numerous people and removed from the public website because despite
being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth, a settlement between
the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
He isn't about to touch the subject matter. He knows you've shared the truth concerning Snit. He knows the truth doesn't show Snit as an honest individual. So, David being David, will ignore it. And proceed as he has been.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the books,
not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially married >> but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
Yep!!
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> news:10oq6o2$l0n8$1@pothead.dont-email.me Tue, 10 Mar 2026 22:42:10 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 2026-03-09, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
DB is not *THAT* stupid. Snit is still a useful idiot for him so he
hasn't tossed him under the bus.
*Yet*.
I'm still not completely sure what David actually thinks snit can do that benefits either of them?
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below. I
suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person you
will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has never
lied to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
DB will deny everything, ignore common sense and logic and demand
further proof.
That's *exactly* what David did in his reply. :)
Snit will probably call you and everyone else a sock.
That's *exactly* what Snit did in his reply. Damn, you really do know them well. <G>
I have snit at -9999 so I only see replies.
I won't allow my client to dedicate so much as a single byte for Snit specifically.
And of course snit the troll who prides himself as providing receipts willnever provide receipts to
prove someone is a sock.
The receipts he does bring don't support anything he wrote as it is. But! I do appreciate that he tries this routine; because it lets others see for themselves that he's very dishonest and struggles to comprehend what he reads. Snit provides proof to support both statements with his receipts.
He's repetitive and very reliable in that respect. I'm especially thankful for the archive of receipts he's been sharing concerning me. No, they don't support any of the claims he makes concerning me, but, in an ironic twist, they do support two of the ones I and others have repeatedly made about him. Those being: (a) he's dishonest (b) he struggles to comprehend what he reads. In other words, he's been showing people that his level of understanding isn't even on par with a typical 4th grader. <G>
It's how snit's diseased brain functions.
Bizarre isn't it?
What's somewhat bizarre is that he thinks he actually snows anyone by doing this. He isn't really snowing David. David isn't that quite that stupid, but, he will play games and let you think he is. He thinks this somehow works to his advantage. That he's being a reliable investigator of some kind by using this ploy.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various Linux
groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters like
Marek Novotny for example.
Not counting snit's floodbot.
Yea. The one he claimed I had a copy of either in source or compiled form. A story he originated all because I replied to David and told him that Snit wouldn't be able to make heads or tails of my wallgreeter source code that David shared and asked snit to help him with. Snit couldn't parse AZ without extensive help. The wallgreeter source was completely beyond him. I'm pretty sure David already knew that when he pinged snit and asked though.
A bot he continues to claim was carrolls - yet the bot tried to provide
shade for snit while it helped him to google seed bullshit about those of us who called snit out for various things.
Of course, snit being snit, tried to morph his original accusation into
being true because he was quoting what I wrote which showed I had insider knowledge of the bot. He was quoting a piece of something I wrote (a small piece infact) which was questioning Snits understanding of reverse engineering code. And coding knowledge in general.
It wasn't at any time supporting his claim that I appeared to have or actually did have insider knowledge of the bot. That still doesn't stop Snit from making the claim though. Anything to avoid admitting he lied about me having a copy of the floodbot in any form and apologizing for writing said lie.
Snit isn't about to do that because he misrepresents himself as an honest
and honorable person. What he wrote about me wasn't honest. Thus it was not honorable of him to have written it. Those activities contradict both of his claims concerning himself. He is neither honest nor honorable.
There's no honor to be had from lying. Lying isn't being honest. He contradicted himself by writing what he did. An apology would confirm what *we all already know* about him. I do find it interesting that he thinks people will read his posts and just take him for his word. Especially the ones which include receipts. It's very nice of him to provide the MIDs. I don't think he considered that anyone would lookup the full content and read the posts for themselves though. That was a tactical error on his part.
As we both know, because some posters have stated they do, some have fact checked his statements and looked up the receipt content. When they did so, they have *all found out that the receipts do not support his statements*
Not a single time have they for either of us. Nor will they. Snit isn't able to actually support his lies with evidence.
Instead, he has to rely on someone seeing a post and either not knowing what an MID actually is, as they take him blindly at his word and read no posts from anyone else challenging him, or not caring enough to bother. Even if they don't do anything with the MIDs he shares, it doesn't take them long to figure out that he's full of shit! when they read a response to it from either of us.
If they read more than a few posts between us and him, they learn that he's not full of shit by accident or because he just doesn't know any better.
Most of the time they find out he does know better and his efforts to be
full of shit are intentional on his part. As in, they catch him lying on their own. <G>
Some of them have challenged him and his receipts on content from both of us. It cracks me the fuck up every single time someone takes him to school over our comments and his 'receipts' that are supposed to support what he's interpreted our words mean. I assume he's atleast trying to interpret us and isn't just dismissing us completely while he repeats his lies about us.
I found that his knowledge and understanding of either subject was significantly lacking; to the point where a conversation on either subject wasn't feasable without Snit bringing himself upto speed; which we all know Snit isn't ever going to do.
I do not understand how he was able to make it thru the grades with the problems he repeatedly demonstrates he has. I'm going to take an educated guess and say that he was probably socially passed the majority of the time. He's a fuckup as an adult. It's not very likely he wasn't a fuck up as a kid previously. His various ailments don't all set in once you reach adult hood. Yes, I researched some of the things he's stated he deals with because my background isn't medical and knowledge is useful.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills to
research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job
manage to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of messages
at all hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Unless his job is being paid to troll, of course it's not possible.
How does one stay up half the night and then get up to go to a job in
the morning?
Speed of some kind?
Those snit drug cocktails will only work to a point and then only for a
while.
Ayep. As with everything else you do, your body will build a tolerance. You can reach a point where the drug of choice has no noticable (to you atleast) effect whatsoever at previous dosage levels. You're doing nothing more in reality than chasing the dragon. A dragon you won't catch.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare
or something like that.
Well, to his credit at least he did try to go into business for himself.
That's fair. It's not an easy thing to do. Depending on your location and
the type of business - You could have a comfortable living. Or get by. You probably won't become a multi millionaire off of it, unless it's something very niche and the demand for it exists or if it's scalable and/or can
become franchised.
But having a guaranteed government income does help.
Coming from the POV when I started of no guaranteed income and thus no
safety net of any kind, I'm sure that would help. I got very familiar with Ramen. I learned which flavors I liked the best. A lot of taste testing you might say. :)
It's not like quitting your job at Exxon to start a house cleaning
business where you no longer have the income from Exxon to rely on.
Haha. Good analogy!
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to Usenet
while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a side
business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home businesses
were legit and paying taxes as long as they, especially the daycare,
was licensed which it was not and why it was shut down.
There are a lot of businesses in the underground economy.
Yep. That economy still flows into the bigger ones at the end of the day. Which benefits us all. Money only really works if it's moving as some say.
However choosing a business like child care which requires insurance and
associated documentation is not a business to start if you want to
remain in the underground economy.
Agreed! It's batshit fucking crazy to start a business that carries so much risk without the proper paperwork. Things can happen.
Are you beginning to understand now?
DB has understood from day one.
He's manipulated snit into his very own useful idiot.
And of course snit took the bait.
David read snit with ease. All he had to do was become what snit thinks is his friend and support him here when we "attack" poor snit. By attack I do
of course mean we post the truth. I don't see that as attacking, and I doubt David actually does either. David uses this to "prove his loyalty" to snit. And snit takes it all hook line and sinker. He's being completely snowed but doesn't see it.
David does seem to have an issue getting Snit on the same book, page, and first sentence of the same paragraph - Yes, one needs to be very specific when giving snit instructions to follow - He's reading from concerning Etrecheck and it's author. I was pleasantly surprised to see that Snit also believes David is out of line and should stop. Atleast Snit agrees with me
on those points. ROFL!
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long before
Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
True.
Search COLA and you will find numerous people who confirmed the snit
discount.
Long before I ever heard of him. Which also means long before I ever knew about it. Yet, Snit attempts to paint me out as the originator and that the information is made up by me. Snit is that dishonest. Openly dishonest.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his
Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the
competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly took
their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the names
were similar.
It was a brilliant marketing strategy IMHO.
It's right out of the movie "Miracle on 34th Street" where if Macy's
department store didn't stock a particular item, they sent the customer
to Gimbels department store which was their main competitor at the time.
They had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer Guy
and the other business started to receive complaints for computers they
never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
Makes sense.
Yep. Snit was exploiting the name resemblence. The problem beside that was he's tech incompetent. He did an excellent job of demonstrating how poor his techie skills actually are with the threads involving troubleshooting his computer. That was a rather painful, as in headache kind, experience for me. I've done a lot of support/service calls remotely, over the phone, etc over the years with people of all ages. Not a single time have I experienced such frustration as I did with Snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people
called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
True.
Denying it happened while attempting to label me as a liar for making it up in the first place. This happened before I ever heard of him. I can't very well make up something about someone years before I even know they exist. Others I've also never met can't very well fact check me and confirm what I wrote, years before I knew snit existed and wrote the first word concerning him. That doesn't make sense.
In what passes for logic in snits mind though - his statement concerning me in relation to this makes perfect sense. Obviously snits logic circuits need a bit of a tune up
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest.
You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser altering
his version of the story he tells.
That's one of snit's go to tricks.
He assumes that people are too ignorant to notice.
He is wrong.
His routine depends on it.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin
among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had zero
chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Obviously a total waste of time.
That's why snit is -9999.
Well, not exactly a total waste of time. The end result confirmed that snits label and variations for it that he created for me are clearly projection on his part. He demonstrated that he (not myself) is indeed the functionally illiterate fraud. Atleast when it comes to tech.
I did more than slightly school him concerning his own gear. Gear I don't run, but, know considerably more about than he does. That information was
not on my bingo card. He greatly misrepresented himself to the group with his claimed mac guy knowledge.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's vast
knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a computer.
Same.
Gremlin complimented me on cleaning a rather nasty virus from a friend's
Windows PC and it meant a lot to me.
It wasn't a compliment in so much as it was acknowledgement of what you did. Fact is you handled it like a fucking pro and you deserved full credit for that. It's humbling and I'm grateful to learn it was of value to you as well.
I don't even run Windows! Common
sense and a well at that time did not detect it.
Gremlin knows his stuff and applies his diagnostic troublshooting skills
across platforms.
that kind of knowledge cannot be learned from a book. It's experience
coupled with a mind that is able to think analytically.
Thanks! Are you politely saying that I'm a geek? <G>
Neither of which snit possess which is why he so obviously jealous of
Gremlin and Steve Carroll as well.
Ayep. He really despises SC though. He practically comments about him in every post. Repeating yet another known to be false statement about him as
he does so. He really does take people to be idiots.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
He will run away.
Just as fast as his drunkard ass can!
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
confusing an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened.
Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods.
That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to
get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet
boot.
That is correct.
Absolutely. Snit seems to forget that it wasn't just him and myself in those discussions. Several others either lurked and/or participated some. Everyone (including snit I suspect) knows what actually happened, when, and how.
Snits story depends on a person not having already read the back and forth between us when it was taking place. Anyone who watched it go down knows
that snit is morphing another version. In other words, Snit is as Glock wrote - making shit up.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but
Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
Correct again.
Yep. As I wrote above, everyone who read it when it was fresh knows snit is writing bullshit about it. He had no idea which keys to press to enter macs version of safe mode. he also wanted to argue with me concerning which functions would work on a system with a failing drive. He had no idea what was actually being stored on the machine vs what could be reinstalled via
the internet connection.
He's supposed to be a mac guy. It's his thing. He should know more about
them than I do. I'm not a mac guy. I don't own a single mac product. I had
no access to any mac gear during the time I was assisting him either.
I incorrectly initially assumed that he was a mac tech of some kind in some manner if nothing else. Going by all the things he's been writing about them. Bad move on my part in hindsight. :)
I was surprised to learn that he's actually an end user. He's an end user. The kind who will spend the time to look for easter eggs in various packages. A more advanced version of David Brooks essentially. He's not the techie
kind of person - even for his own preferred gear. He doesn't actually know much about them beyond that of specific software packages he's used. He had no business at any point running a computer repair shop of any kind.
Who knows how many additional computers he messed up where the owner didn't ever get it fixed because they either couldn't afford to or didn't know
where else to get reliable help.
Can you imagine a person running a business offering repairs of
computers who has no clue how to boot into recovery mode?
That's like someone opening up an auto repair business and is asking
"what are these numbers on my wrenches ?".
That's a great description of what Snit showed us in that discussion. He's really clueless beyond that of specific software packages he uses. And, we aren't talking about complex packages either.
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
Run DB, run!
You are no Forest Gump though.
*larf*
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they
push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at
various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like Las
Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY
publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up to
harm him.
At first snit attempted to spin it claiming Usenet isn't an accurate
source of information while ignoring that the official court website was
posted and it was a .gov site so unlikely to be fake.
That's exactly what he was trying to do when the material was still active.
<G> He even tried to play games concerning the site - He stated on atleast
one occasion that it was not an official arizona government site. ROFL!
Snit is simply a dishonest piece of shit.
It's what he is.
There is no other explanation for his behavior.
I agree completely.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a number
of years which depends upon the particular court at which point they
are purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because they
are considered public record.
This is true and has been explained to snit many times already.
Aside from his divorce and haressment in public criminal arrest, the
majority of snit's court cases are multitudes of traffic violations.
Mostly for speeding and not having active insurance or financial
responsibility.
Same as the childcare business he ran out of his trailer. For someone
who claims to be honest and honorable he sure breaks the law a lot.
Here is AZ policy.
<https://share.google/aimode/2PECv8mjLbC8qd4MF>
"Traffic violations generally remain on Arizona public court websites
and motor vehicle records for three to five years, though points for
those violations are officially active for only 1 year. More serious,
criminal violations (e.g., DUI, reckless driving) may remain accessible
on court records for a longer period."
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these
still show up.
Several people have done this.
However, in order to obtain the documents one has to agree to not post
them publicly and they are somehow watermarked so it's not a good idea.
Besides nothing further is required as a decent background check reveals
snit's sordid criminal history.
In truth, snit should not be allowed to get behind the wheel of a car.
100% agreed! He's financially irresponsible along with a bad driving record.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the
incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
Snit is tossing whatever he can at the wall and trying to conflate the
issue. Enough honest people took screenshots or viewed the original
files to debunk snit's lame claims.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was
screenshot by numerous people and removed from the public website
because despite being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth, a
settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it was
rightfully removed.
Correct.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
Here is another one snit keeps pushing:
'Snit, Where is Your Proof That Carroll Claimed The Police Visited Him?'
https://groups.google.com/g/talk.politics.guns/c/BpDIKI3GVn0/m/Zc1f0gBMAw
AJ
Read through this one to see how many times snit has changed his story.
It's hilarious!
Why snit continues to make a fool of himself in public remains a mystery
though.
IMO, it's the attention. He craves the interaction. Even if it's mostly negative for him, he still wants it. What a life to live, right?
"David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> news:n191rpF7l3nU1@mid.individual.net Mon, 09 Mar 2026 23:02:17 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 09/03/2026 21:51, Glock wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<n14oilFhffkU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$1@apd.eternal-september.org>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but nothing >>>>>>> concerning.
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my >>>>> actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say should not >>>>> be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not >>>>> even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing.
Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing >>>>> an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they >>>>> push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense. They >>>>> are basically MAGA and think like them: it is about tribalism and
scapegoating to them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below. I
suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person you
will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has never lied >>> to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get pointed >>> out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government regarding
disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where snit >>> admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various illnesses. >>>
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various Linux
groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters like Marek >>> Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills to
research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job manage >>> to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of messages at all
hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare or >>> something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to Usenet
while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a side business, >>> failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home businesses were legit
and paying taxes as long as they, especially the daycare, was licensed
which it was not and why it was shut down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long before
Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his
Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the
competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly took
their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the names
were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer Guy and >>> the other business started to receive complaints for computers they never >>> tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people called >>> that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest.
You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser altering
his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin among >>> others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had zero chance of >>> repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's vast
knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing >>> an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened.
Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods.
That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to get >>> into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but Glasser >>> claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they
push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at
various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like Las
Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY publicly >>> viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up to
harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a number of >>> years which depends upon the particular court at which point they are
purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because they
are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these still >>> show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the
incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was screenshot >>> by numerous people and removed from the public website because despite
being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth, a settlement between >>> the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the books, >>> not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially married >>> but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
Provide *EVIDENCE* of any claim and I will investigate.
You'll do nothing of the sort. Instead, you'll do what you've done before. Which is exactly what you've done with this reply. You know that the above information is all true. You mistakenly think that you're helping Snit by
not responding to any of it specifically and instead playing games.
I provided you a step by step how to pull the court records when they were still live from the site. You either did, and kept your mouth shut because
it confirmed what I and others wrote, or you didn't proceed any further because you already knew it was true and you didn't want to see it for yourself. Despite asking for instructions on how. You get off I think on wasting peoples time almost as much as you do when you write dishonest statements about them.
Lung cancer, right, David? Where in the fuck did you ever get that idea?
"Nobody" <nobodyspecial@kinkos.net> news:69b0c72a$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Wed, 11 Mar 2026 01:36:42 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
tell me what is the obsession with this snit poster? From cross posts
in alt.home.repair and comp.sys.mac.advocacy, both of which I lurk in,
snit seems to be mentally retarded, at least from what I have read.
He or she doesn't seem to be a troll but more of an ill informed poster.
They're a troll. Along with being very ill informed about a variety of subjects.
I do have one direct question for you Linuxiac and that is why do you
seemingly have the same ASCII art X-Face of a chicken as snit does?
Well, if you examine the headers...
Message-ID: <69af5d6e$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
That's the post from Linuxiac. Some of the header information is below: Organization: Blank
User-Agent: Usenapp for MacOS
X-Usenapp: v1.28/l - Full License
***
And this is one from Snit (brock):
Message-ID: <69b0497d$12$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
From: Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Photography competition.
Organization: Southern Nevada Institute of Technology
User-Agent: Usenapp for MacOS
X-Usenapp: v1.28/l - Full License
***
While not confirmed, you might have caught him nymshifting. He did the same thing under the handle Sigmond. Only in that case, he forgot to get Sigmond an IP different than the one he was using as he posted under the Snit handle.
When I did a quick google groups search for linuxiac - Three threads came up. the oldest is from 2007.
from comp.os.linux.advocacy. Its most likely a very old sock of Snits.
On Mar 21, 2026 at 11:18:35 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB417177F21AACHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com>
news:69b0c8ba$2$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Wed, 11 Mar 2026 01:43:22
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Notice how you lie your ass off. I bring receipts.
No lies were written about you. Everything above can and has been
fact checked many times Snit.
And the facts show you two are lying your asses off.
The so called receipts are actually
further proof of your very dishonest nature and serious struggle
with reading comprehension.
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
None of those posts support your accusation of Pothead being a white
supremacist.
Learn to READ:
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
They do not show support of your additional dishonest on your part claim of >> them attacking you for being a jew, either.
Who do they lie about as much who is NOT Jewish?
And off you run.
You also claimed to not be reading my posts. You lied.
On 22 Mar 2026 20:15:57 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 21, 2026 at 11:18:35 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB417177F21AACHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com>
news:69b0c8ba$2$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Wed, 11 Mar 2026 01:43:22 >>> GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Notice how you lie your ass off. I bring receipts.
No lies were written about you. Everything above can and has been
fact checked many times Snit.
And the facts show you two are lying your asses off.
The so called receipts are actually
further proof of your very dishonest nature and serious struggle
with reading comprehension.
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
None of those posts support your accusation of Pothead being a white
supremacist.
Learn to READ:
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
They do not show support of your additional dishonest on your part claim of >>> them attacking you for being a jew, either.
Who do they lie about as much who is NOT Jewish?
Show Pothead attacking you because you are A Jew.
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,105 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 492342:08:39 |
| Calls: | 14,158 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 186,284 |
| D/L today: |
1,501 files (560M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,502,624 |