From Newsgroup: comp.sys.raspberry-pi

Hi,

I'm just considering switch from openbox to libwc on my rpi4b 4gb.

Is there a performance drop or increase of mem usage I should worry about?
I use it as a desktop.

Roto

.... expert (n): Someone who knows where to look for the answer.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.raspberry-pi

Ondrej Bucek <usenet@vk3heg.net> writes:

Hi,

I'm just considering switch from openbox to libwc on my rpi4b 4gb.

Is there a performance drop or increase of mem usage I should worry about?
I use it as a desktop.

When I slapped a new sd image on my pi500, it was automatically on
wayland. Honestly, can't tell the difference if that helps.'

Performance numbers, I haven't checked. So rarely do I load the gui on
my systems. I sort of dwell in tty.

D
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.raspberry-pi

On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 18:13:49 -0700, Daniel wrote:

So rarely do I load the gui on my systems. I sort of dwell in tty.

I use the command line a lot, too. But doing it in a GUI terminal emulator gives you so much more capability (e.g. copy/paste between windows, scrollback) than running a plain text console.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.raspberry-pi

Ondrej Bucek <usenet@vk3heg.net> wrote:

Hi,

I'm just considering switch from openbox to libwc on my rpi4b 4gb.

Is there a performance drop or increase of mem usage I should worry about?
I use it as a desktop.

When I switched Kubuntu on Intel from X11 to Wayland performance notably improved, perhaps due to better use of the GPU. I haven't tried it on a Pi.

Theo

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.raspberry-pi

On 22/10/2025 10:41, Theo wrote:

Ondrej Bucek <usenet@vk3heg.net> wrote:

Hi,

I'm just considering switch from openbox to libwc on my rpi4b 4gb.

Is there a performance drop or increase of mem usage I should worry about? >> I use it as a desktop.

When I switched Kubuntu on Intel from X11 to Wayland performance notably improved, perhaps due to better use of the GPU. I haven't tried it on a Pi.

Theo

There is a general rule that after a time, any chunk of software is so
full of bodges and patches and hacked on bug fixes and cruft that is
worth rewriting from the ground up.
--
Renewable energy: Expensive solutions that don't work to a problem that doesn't exist instituted by self legalising protection rackets that
don't protect, masquerading as public servants who don't serve the public.


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.raspberry-pi

On 10/22/25 05:30, Ondrej Bucek wrote:

Hi,

I'm just considering switch from openbox to libwc on my rpi4b 4gb.

Is there a performance drop or increase of mem usage I should worry about?
I use it as a desktop.

Roto

.... expert (n): Someone who knows where to look for the answer.

You can go back and forth so no risk if you don't like it. I have an LG monitor that doesn't like to play with Wayland, so the screen saver
turns off the monitor but won't turn it back on. Wayland doesn't work
with RealVNC (I'm quite fond of RealVNC). There are other options.
Menus and panel changes are different but more or less understandable.
--

Knute Johnson
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.raspberry-pi

On 22/10/2025 14:42, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

There is a general rule that after a time, any chunk of software is so
full of bodges and patches and hacked on bug fixes and cruft that is
worth rewriting from the ground up.

It's a great way of creating a whole new set of bodges and bugs, by
throwing away all the years of knowledge and bug fixes.

The Wayland crew decided to avoid some of this by simply not
implementing great chunks of functionality and refusing to ever get to
feature parity with X11.

---druck
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.raspberry-pi

Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:

On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 18:13:49 -0700, Daniel wrote:

So rarely do I load the gui on my systems. I sort of dwell in tty.

I use the command line a lot, too. But doing it in a GUI terminal emulator gives you so much more capability (e.g. copy/paste between windows, scrollback) than running a plain text console.

Yeah I use tmux. But for my use, a gui isn't necessary unless i need a
ful web experience - not often. Yes yes I'm a freak.

D
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.raspberry-pi

On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 18:36:08 -0700, Daniel wrote:

Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:

On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 18:13:49 -0700, Daniel wrote:

So rarely do I load the gui on my systems. I sort of dwell in tty.

I use the command line a lot, too. But doing it in a GUI terminal
emulator gives you so much more capability (e.g. copy/paste between
windows, scrollback) than running a plain text console.

Yeah I use tmux.

Try a GUI terminal emulator. Being able to have multiple windows/tabs open
at once is a game-changer.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.raspberry-pi

On 22/10/2025 22:05, druck wrote:

On 22/10/2025 14:42, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

There is a general rule that after a time, any chunk of software is so
full of bodges and patches and hacked on bug fixes and cruft that is
worth rewriting from the ground up.

It's a great way of creating a whole new set of bodges and bugs, by
throwing away all the years of knowledge and bug fixes.

Yes, but usually from a better starting point

The Wayland crew decided to avoid some of this by simply not
implementing great chunks of functionality and refusing to ever get to feature parity with X11.

Indeed. My one experience of trying to run X over a network revealed
dire performance and flaky behaviour.

Like, who needs it?

---druck

--
The biggest threat to humanity comes from socialism, which has utterly diverted our attention away from what really matters to our existential survival, to indulging in navel gazing and faux moral investigations
into what the world ought to be, whilst we fail utterly to deal with
what it actually is.


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.raspberry-pi

On 23/10/2025 02:36, Daniel wrote:

Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:

On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 18:13:49 -0700, Daniel wrote:

So rarely do I load the gui on my systems. I sort of dwell in tty.

I use the command line a lot, too. But doing it in a GUI terminal emulator >> gives you so much more capability (e.g. copy/paste between windows,
scrollback) than running a plain text console.

Yeah I use tmux. But for my use, a gui isn't necessary unless i need a
ful web experience - not often. Yes yes I'm a freak.

Depends: many of my machines have no GUI at all. Except via a web
application.

D

--
A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on
its shoes.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.raspberry-pi

Yeah I use tmux.

Try a GUI terminal emulator. Being able to have multiple windows/tabs
open at once is a game-changer.

Yeah, but he mentioned he's using tmux.

It's a terminal utility which enables you to have multiple terminal windows/panels, switch between them, arrange them on the screen, copy/paste etc. all with just keyboard shortcuts. It's pretty neat.

.... A toast -- To a kinder gentler echo

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.raspberry-pi

On 23/10/2025 08:51, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

On 22/10/2025 22:05, druck wrote:

On 22/10/2025 14:42, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

There is a general rule that after a time, any chunk of software is
so full of bodges and patches and hacked on bug fixes and cruft that
is worth rewriting from the ground up.

It's a great way of creating a whole new set of bodges and bugs, by
throwing away all the years of knowledge and bug fixes.

Yes, but usually from a better starting point

The Wayland crew decided to avoid some of this by simply not
implementing great chunks of functionality and refusing to ever get to
feature parity with X11.

Indeed. My one experience of trying to run X over a network revealed
dire performance and flaky behaviour.

Like, who needs it?

---druck

I run X apps across the home network all the time. I have a small 1L
computer that acts as a NAS and runs headless. Mostly I just ssh into it
but there are times when it's easier to run X across the net.

At work I use RDP onto a Windows server over the VPN to access data
centre developmemt machines in Netherlands from my home. I use X for
accessing the Linux machines onto the Windows server and RDP to get it
to my laptop. X across the data centre 1/2.5/10Gb network is plenty fast
and RDP compresses the data nicely to me. Fast enough to watch video
generated on a Linux box, X its way to Windows and RDP its way to me.

ssh -C -X someone@somehost to enable compression and X11 forwarding.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2