Having gone to Heroes IV right when it arrived, I never realized that
the AI in Heroes III is very competent. Heroes IV basically had no AI
that I could discern. The missions were like ride down this coast
killing wolves until you get off the island - no interaction with the
enemy. Heroes III just kicked my ass again because the enemy came from
a direction I didn't expect.
What Heroes IV had going for it was that it was very pretty. They
brought back an AI in Heroes V but that is for another story.
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 05:24:34 -0500, Altered Beast
<j63480576@gmail.com> wrote:
Having gone to Heroes IV right when it arrived, I never realized that
the AI in Heroes III is very competent. Heroes IV basically had no AI
that I could discern. The missions were like ride down this coast
killing wolves until you get off the island - no interaction with the
enemy. Heroes III just kicked my ass again because the enemy came from
a direction I didn't expect.
What Heroes IV had going for it was that it was very pretty. They
brought back an AI in Heroes V but that is for another story.
Past the first HOMM, I really don't differentiate the various
iterations. They're all a blur to me, merging one into the next. Maybe slightly better graphics but I never really saw much difference in
gameplay or AI. I bought and played the games, but they never engaged
me like the first one because they lacked the freshness and novelty of
the original. The innumerable expansions in HOMM5 (and later Heroes Chronicles) ultimately drove me away entirely. The games just weren't offering enough new for me to keep buying (and buying and buying) the
newest iterations.
But I still fire up HOMM1 and 2 every now and again. They're still surprisingly playable experiences, and despite their age still look
pretty good.
Which isn't to say I disagree with your assessment. I never played the
game intensely enough to really notice; I was more of a dabbler in the franchise than a die-hard fan. But -for me at least- the competency of
the AI was the least of the series' problems.
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 05:24:34 -0500, Altered Beast
<j63480576@gmail.com> wrote:
Having gone to Heroes IV right when it arrived, I never realized that
the AI in Heroes III is very competent. Heroes IV basically had no AI
that I could discern. The missions were like ride down this coast
killing wolves until you get off the island - no interaction with the
enemy. Heroes III just kicked my ass again because the enemy came from
a direction I didn't expect.
What Heroes IV had going for it was that it was very pretty. They
brought back an AI in Heroes V but that is for another story.
Past the first HOMM, I really don't differentiate the various
iterations. They're all a blur to me, merging one into the next. Maybe slightly better graphics but I never really saw much difference in
gameplay or AI. I bought and played the games, but they never engaged
me like the first one because they lacked the freshness and novelty of
the original. The innumerable expansions in HOMM5 (and later Heroes Chronicles) ultimately drove me away entirely. The games just weren't offering enough new for me to keep buying (and buying and buying) the
newest iterations.
Sysop: | DaiTengu |
---|---|
Location: | Appleton, WI |
Users: | 991 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 145:02:52 |
Calls: | 12,962 |
Files: | 186,574 |
Messages: | 3,266,506 |