• ESRB is fine with lootboxes

    From Spalls Hurgenson@spallshurgenson@gmail.com to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action on Sat Mar 21 11:36:04 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action


    Remember video-game rating systems? We're all probably old enough that
    we rarely pay attention to them (unless you have kids) but they are a
    useful tool to help limit certain games from being played by certain
    age groups.

    [Although, man, was there a fuss when the idea was first
    introduced back in the 90s! Any old-timers on Usenet
    remember that era, or just me?]

    Recently, the European video game rating system --PEGI-- announced
    that it was going to start taking into account things like lootboxes
    ('paid random items') and whether games offered unrestricted
    communications (e.g., open voice chat where that foul-mouth 12 year
    old, can be solicited to by a creepy libertarian ;-) when deciding
    what rating they gave the game. That way games with gambling
    mechanics or pedophiles are marked as inappropriate for the kiddies.*

    Seems reasonable to me. More information is good information.

    But The USA rating system, ESRB, says no to the idea. Only content is important, they say. Also, it would just be too much work, what with
    games being updated all the time. Heaven forfend they actually earn
    their licensing fees.

    Mostly, though, I suspect it's the ESRB is painfully aware that a lot
    of their partners depend upon selling lootboxes to kids and they'd
    lose a lot of revenue if they started locking out gambling. ESRB is a self-funded organization, see. PEGI is more like an industry
    self-regulation based on government agreed-upon standards but ESRB
    gets paid for its services by publishers. The latter group depends on
    the good will of its partners to stay in business.

    Telling those partners to give up a hugely profitable part of their
    revenue probably won't go down well. So ESRB just turns a blind eye.
    Lootboxes are out of their purview, they say. It's only content that
    matters.

    Do you think ESRB should take lootboxes into consideration with their
    age ratings, or should PEGI back down on the idea?







    ----
    * Hi! I'm the required link to the article https://www.gamesindustry.biz/esrb-will-not-adopt-pegi-age-rating-changes-in-the-us-as-it-could-be-confusing

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark P. Nelson@markpnelson@sbcglobal.net to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action on Sat Mar 21 15:43:45 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

    Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> wrote in news:p1dtrkhna2nk7520l8vfcmniscrhrc8o66@4ax.com:

    Do you think ESRB should take lootboxes into consideration with their
    age ratings, or should PEGI back down on the idea?


    If people in the USA paid more attention in basic arithmetic classes, this wouldn't be an
    issue.
    --
    Clotho, Lachesis, Atropos -- the only sysadmins that matter
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2