• the myth of the computer hacker (2002)

    From Ethan Carter@ec1828@somewhere.edu to alt.2600, comp.misc on Wed Apr 2 20:24:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.misc

    The Myth of the Computer Hacker
    Reid Skibell
    New York, USA
    Information, Communication & Society 5:3 2002 336–356

    (*) Abstract

    The seriousness of computer hacking is not exaggerated, it is far worse
    than that. The computer hacker has attained the status of myth; society associates all computer crime with a mythical perpetrator that bears no resemblance to reality. This paper will argue that in the early stages
    of the myth the computer hacker was regarded as a highly skilled but
    mentally disturbed youth who has an unhealthy association with
    computers. The new reality of electronic commerce resulted in pressures
    that culminated in the computer hacker becoming regarded as a dangerous criminal. A thorough analysis of the statistics will demonstrate that
    the majority of computer intruders are neither dangerous nor highly
    skilled, and thus nothing like the mythical hacker.

    Full paper: http://130.18.86.27/faculty/warkentin/securitypapers/Merrill/Skibell2002_C&S5_3_HackerMyth.pdf

    (*) My reading

    There are typos in the paper, which would have been easily caught by a
    spell checker. Some typos are difficult to understand. For instance,
    it seems that ``soldier'' has been written at various places as
    ``solider.'' Same typo over and over? It is written properly in at
    least one place.

    The author seems to use the name ``hacker'' without any mention to
    computer specialists in the original sense of the word. No mention of
    Steven Levy's ``Hackers'' from 1984.

    Considering the length of the paper, it is not quite worth it.
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@ldo@nz.invalid to alt.2600, comp.misc on Fri Apr 4 21:45:35 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.misc

    On Wed, 02 Apr 2025 20:24:27 -0300, Ethan Carter quoted:

    The seriousness of computer hacking is not exaggerated, it is far worse
    than that. The computer hacker has attained the status of myth; society associates all computer crime with a mythical perpetrator that bears no resemblance to reality.

    Lack of distinction between “hackers” and “crackers” already makes it not
    worth reading.
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From rek2 hispagatos@rek2@hispagatos.org.invalid to alt.2600,comp.misc on Sat Apr 5 03:08:18 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.misc

    ["Followup-To:" header set to alt.2600.]
    On 2025-04-04, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    On Wed, 02 Apr 2025 20:24:27 -0300, Ethan Carter quoted:

    The seriousness of computer hacking is not exaggerated, it is far worse
    than that. The computer hacker has attained the status of myth; society
    associates all computer crime with a mythical perpetrator that bears no
    resemblance to reality.

    Lack of distinction between “hackers” and “crackers” already makes it not
    worth reading.

    There is no need to cherry pick mass media or personal articles, a
    hacker is well deserved represented correctly by Steven Levy on his
    books "Hackers, heroes of the computer revolution" what people in diff
    sectors (hollywood, security complext, fear mongers, lazy sysadmins
    blaming "hackers" for all their errors, etc etc ) have try to make it be,
    that is another problem...
    the book: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hackers:_Heroes_of_the_Computer_Revolution

    and actual organization working for preserve the real values: https://www.hackingisnotacrime.org/

    read the Synopsis you find an updated 2025 explanation of hackers that
    we can all agree with.


    Happy hacking
    ReK2
    --
    - {gemini,https}://{,rek2.}hispagatos.org - mastodon: @rek2@hispagatos.space
    - [https|gemini]://2600.Madrid - https://hispagatos.space/@rek2
    - https://keyoxide.org/A31C7CE19D9C58084EA42BA26C0B0D11E9303EC5
    --- Synchronet 3.20c-Linux NewsLink 1.2