France is deploying a homegrown, open-source alternative to Teams and
Zoom, as another small step in the ongoing Europe-wide move towards
getting rid of dependence on US-based services
In article <10lgq92$1mhui$1@dont-email.me>,
Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?= <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
France is deploying a homegrown, open-source alternative to Teams and
Zoom, as another small step in the ongoing Europe-wide move towards
getting rid of dependence on US-based services
It's a shame that we don't have some process to establish open source protocols for use on the internet for these sorts of things... you know,
like the RFCs..... nobody uses THOSE anymore.
--scott
Scott Dorsey <kludge@panix.com> wrote at 00:37 this Friday (GMT):
It's a shame that we don't have some process to establish open source
protocols for use on the internet for these sorts of things... you know,
like the RFCs..... nobody uses THOSE anymore.
--scott
People forgot what "interoperability" meant.
Scott Dorsey <kludge@panix.com> wrote at 00:37 this Friday (GMT):
In article <10lgq92$1mhui$1@dont-email.me>,
Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?= <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
France is deploying a homegrown, open-source alternative to Teams
and Zoom, as another small step in the ongoing Europe-wide move
towards getting rid of dependence on US-based services
It's a shame that we don't have some process to establish open
source protocols for use on the internet for these sorts of
things... you know, like the RFCs..... nobody uses THOSE anymore.
--scott
People forgot what "interoperability" meant.
candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote:
Scott Dorsey <kludge@panix.com> wrote at 00:37 this Friday (GMT):
In article <10lgq92$1mhui$1@dont-email.me>,
Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?= <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
France is deploying a homegrown, open-source alternative to Teams
and Zoom, as another small step in the ongoing Europe-wide move >>>>towards getting rid of dependence on US-based services
It's a shame that we don't have some process to establish open
source protocols for use on the internet for these sorts of
things... you know, like the RFCs..... nobody uses THOSE anymore.
--scott
People forgot what "interoperability" meant.
"People" didn't forget -- most "people" still very much want interoperability and for their comms to "just work".
For-profit corporations abandoned interoperability because there was
more profit to be obtained from walled gardens than from
interoperability.
For-profit corporations abandoned interoperability because there was
more profit to be obtained from walled gardens than from
interoperability.
candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote:
Scott Dorsey <kludge@panix.com> wrote at 00:37 this Friday (GMT):
It's a shame that we don't have some process to establish open source
protocols for use on the internet for these sorts of things... you know, >> like the RFCs..... nobody uses THOSE anymore.
--scott
People forgot what "interoperability" meant.
I've already almost lost my voice from calling for interoperability so
often.
Sure interoperability does NOT mean that every key shall open your front door! Maybe some just mix that up?
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,102 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 492329:44:07 |
| Calls: | 14,132 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 186,278 |
| D/L today: |
3,746 files (1,316M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,501,444 |