From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy
"TDS and the madness of King Joe Biden"
<
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/tds-and-the-madness-of-king-joe- biden/ar-AA27kEAB?uxmode=ruby>
"Former President Joe Biden ran as the steady moderate who would restore normalcy. In practice, his presidency became something stranger: a
cognitively declining president whose White House staff, driven by "Trump derangement syndrome," used his office to reverse policies that were
working and to impose measures that would have been considered extreme
even during the 2016 election.
Reports and congressional investigations have documented aides limiting Biden’s schedule, managing his public appearances, and exercising
significant presidential authority with minimal direct input from the man
in the Oval Office. While Biden was presented as the adult in the room,
real power often rested with staff whose primary mission appeared to be
the systematic undoing of Trump-era achievements.
That produced a pattern of reversal and radicalization. Effective border measures, such as Remain in Mexico and physical barriers, were dismantled
on Day 1. Energy policies that had delivered independence were reversed.
The chaotic Afghanistan withdrawal damaged American credibility. The
results were immediate and measurable: record illegal crossings, renewed pressure on energy prices, and a foreign policy vacuum. COVID-19 shot
mandates increased skepticism about government vaccine requirements.
School closings robbed kids of education and socialization, but school teachers continued to collect full pay and benefits to stare at a
computer screen and Zoom with children.
At the same time, the Biden administration aggressively advanced policies
that had been marginal on the left a decade earlier. Expansive gender
ideology entered schools, sports, prisons, and the military. DEI mandates
were imposed across federal agencies with little regard for merit.
Attempts at large-scale student debt cancellation and sweeping climate
rules were pushed through executive action. These were not incremental
shifts from the Obama era. They represented a sharp break toward
positions once considered fringe even within Democratic circles.
The strategy was explicitly anti-Trump rather than pro-results. When
those policies produced visible failure at the border, in schools, and in public safety, the response was often escalation rather than correction.
The temporary satisfaction of undoing Trump-era gains did not moderate
the left. It accelerated the shift of progressives toward positions once viewed as extreme within their own coalition.
Many of the Biden administration’s most aggressive executive actions were later struck down or sharply narrowed by the courts. When the Trump administration moved to reverse those policies, the courts largely upheld
the reversals. The legal system proved more resistant to the radical
agenda than the initial executive actions suggested.
The same grievance-driven approach extended to law enforcement. The
decision to pursue President Donald Trump and his supporters through an illegally appointed and highly partisan special counsel further damaged institutional trust. It drew unexpected sympathy from libertarians who
had long been skeptical of Trump but recognized the danger of weaponizing
the justice system for political ends.
Biden was sold as the moderate who would calm the country. Instead, his decline created space for staff-driven radicalism that reversed working policies, imported previously fringe ideas into the mainstream, and
helped drive a meaningful segment of the Democratic coalition further
left. The country paid the price in lost time, damaged institutions, and deepened division. The experiment of governing through a diminished
president and an ideologically captured staff proved costly. The voters ultimately rendered their verdict.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2