• Re: Hugh Huntzinger the plagiariser, name-smearer, ... EXPOSED

    From Kanan Gupta@ganji4everFAKE@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Jul 4 23:54:36 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you.

    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the- plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within

    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of
    published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED)
    Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the
    NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.
    --
    Kanan

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tom Elam@thomas.e.elam@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sun Jul 5 14:00:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you.

    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within

    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of
    published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED)
    Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the
    NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years
    ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Glock@glock@localhost.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sun Jul 5 20:08:34 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you.

    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within

    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of
    published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED)
    Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the
    NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years
    ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various
    names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character.
    --
    Glock
    Always Locked and Loaded.
    Bring it on snowflakes.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From -hh@recscuba_google@huntzinger.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh on Mon Jul 6 07:21:29 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 7/4/26 23:54, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you.

    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    ...

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.> And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.

    Nope, not dead yet.

    Instead, feel sorry for how much of a luzer this troll is.

    They're still butthurt over something, and stooped to ancient rantings
    of an addled old man suffering from dementia.

    FYI, that guy's family eventually revoked his internet access, several
    years before he died. IIRC, the "Final Straw" was him lashing out at
    another friend by falsely accusing them of raping their own daughter.

    Quite a sad story.

    FYI, when it comes to care-giving of family with dementia, know that a
    small percentage become very mean. A friend who's Mom went this route
    got a suggestion to have some business cards printed up with a brief explanation/apology. They found a card was a tremendous help when Mom
    would spontaneously start cursing at waitresses: being able to hand over
    a card was quick, discrete & quickly defused situations.


    -hh
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Socialism is for losers@MeanDog@Snarl.Dash to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Mon Jul 6 16:34:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Mon, 6 Jul 2026 07:21:29 -0400, -hh
    <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:

    On 7/4/26 23:54, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you.

    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    ...

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.> And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.

    Nope, not dead yet.

    Instead, feel sorry for how much of a luzer this troll is.

    They're still butthurt over something, and stooped to ancient rantings
    of an addled old man suffering from dementia.

    FYI, that guy's family eventually revoked his internet access, several
    years before he died. IIRC, the "Final Straw" was him lashing out at >another friend by falsely accusing them of raping their own daughter.

    Quite a sad story.

    FYI, when it comes to care-giving of family with dementia, know that a
    small percentage become very mean. A friend who's Mom went this route
    got a suggestion to have some business cards printed up with a brief >explanation/apology. They found a card was a tremendous help when Mom
    would spontaneously start cursing at waitresses: being able to hand over
    a card was quick, discrete & quickly defused situations.


    -hh

    Clearly, my initial analysis of Hughie as a piece_of_shit wannabe
    phoney was accurate.
    --

    Two kinds of people in the USA, today

    1) Conservatives, whose glass is always half full. :)

    2) Leftists, whose glass is always half empty. :(
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ReefMon@reefermon33@reggie.org to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Mon Jul 6 18:16:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Mon, 06 Jul 2026 16:34:24 -0400, Socialism is for losers wrote:

    On Mon, 6 Jul 2026 07:21:29 -0400, -hh
    <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:

    On 7/4/26 23:54, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you.

    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the- >>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    ...

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.> And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.

    Nope, not dead yet.

    Instead, feel sorry for how much of a luzer this troll is.

    They're still butthurt over something, and stooped to ancient rantings
    of an addled old man suffering from dementia.

    FYI, that guy's family eventually revoked his internet access, several >>years before he died. IIRC, the "Final Straw" was him lashing out at >>another friend by falsely accusing them of raping their own daughter.

    Quite a sad story.

    FYI, when it comes to care-giving of family with dementia, know that a >>small percentage become very mean. A friend who's Mom went this route
    got a suggestion to have some business cards printed up with a brief >>explanation/apology. They found a card was a tremendous help when Mom >>would spontaneously start cursing at waitresses: being able to hand over
    a card was quick, discrete & quickly defused situations.


    -hh

    Clearly, my initial analysis of Hughie as a piece_of_shit wannabe
    phoney was accurate.

    Is that blowhard hh still posting to Usenet?
    I remember him from rec.scuba as well as some Windows groups.
    It looks like you reached the same conclusion many others have.
    hh is a one-upper fucknozzle who is so insecure that he needs to
    invent adventures, post fake pictures and claim certifications he
    doesn't have just to make himself feel better. There isn't a more
    insecure person alive than fucknozzle hh.
    Here is an example of him bragging and never posting the requested
    cite when he gets caught. https://groups.google.com/g/rec.scuba/c/1XsthTf9XIs/m/d31QIPvgLUcJ

    "Steve Kramer <st...@seatraveler.com> wrote:
    H. Huntzinger wrote:
    On 17 July 2004 Steve Kramer <st...@seatraveler.com> wrote in
    reference >to URL http://www.gmorning.info/photo_vision.htm

    By the way, please show us the URLs to the magazines that publish
    YOUR photos. :o)

    "

    hh also nymshifts.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Mon Jul 6 15:35:16 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you.

    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within

    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of
    published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED)
    Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the
    NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years
    ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.


    You disparaging someone...that's irony.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Skeeter@invalid@none.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Mon Jul 6 16:52:03 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    In article <112haj5$2e8fs$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you.

    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the- >>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within

    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of
    published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original >>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED)
    Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the
    NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years
    ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.


    You disparaging someone...that's irony.

    HH don't like you either.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Socialism is for losers@MeanDog@Snarl.Dash to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Mon Jul 6 18:58:30 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you.

    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the- >>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within

    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of
    published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original >>>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED)
    Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the
    NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years
    ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various
    names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of >some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character.

    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first
    encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the
    attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    --

    Two kinds of people in the USA, today

    1) Conservatives, whose glass is always half full. :)

    2) Leftists, whose glass is always half empty. :(
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 08:10:09 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you.

    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the- >>>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within

    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of
    published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original >>>>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages >>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED)
    Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the
    NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years
    ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I
    recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various
    names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character.

    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the
    attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Skeeter@invalid@none.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 10:42:41 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    In article <112j4sh$2ugbp$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you.

    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the- >>>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within

    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original >>>>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages >>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED)
    Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the >>> same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years
    ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I
    recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various
    names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of >> some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character.

    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    I say most of his "bragging" is lies.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 10:52:06 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-07-07 09:42, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112j4sh$2ugbp$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the- >>>>>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original >>>>>>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages >>>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the >>>>> same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH. >>>>
    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I
    recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various
    names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of >>>> some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character.

    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first
    encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the
    attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    I say most of his "bragging" is lies.

    You say it...

    ...but you have no proof, do you?

    And it's good that you put "bragging" in quotes...

    ...because you show it isn't literally bragging at all.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Skeeter@invalid@none.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 12:43:22 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    In article <112jec6$2ugbp$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 09:42, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112j4sh$2ugbp$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages >>>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the >>>>> same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH. >>>>
    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >>>> recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various >>>> names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character.

    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first
    encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the
    attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    I say most of his "bragging" is lies.

    You say it...

    Yea stupid, that's what I wrote.

    ...but you have no proof, do you?

    Do you?

    And it's good that you put "bragging" in quotes...

    ...because you show it isn't literally bragging at all.

    By whose rules? You got nothing and he don't like you
    anyway.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tom Elam@thomas.e.elam@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 14:56:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 7/7/26 11:10 AM, Alan wrote:
    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you.

    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger- >>>>>> the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within

    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's
    original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages >>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED)
    Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the >>>> same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years
    ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I
    recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various
    names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not
    fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character.

    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first
    encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the
    attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    How do you know if he is lying or not? So I looked up a few things just
    for fact checking by all concerned.

    His mom (of the Delaware beach house mentioned in a long-ago CSMA post)
    died in 2024. He was brought up a Presbyterian. The obit sounds like mom
    was a wonderful person. Based on that obit she had at 4 grandchildren
    and 3 sons. Hugh is 66 years old.

    I also have his address and phone number. I will not share that info or
    the source. I looked up the home on Google Earth and it is very modest
    NJ ranch on a small corner lot. Based on foliage and street condition
    the entire area appears to be 1950-60 vintage. Narrow streets with no
    curbs, no sidewalks and small lots. Unfortunately Hugh's specific home
    is not covered in Street View but I found a confirming picture on Zillow.

    If Hugh is as well off as he has claimed to be on CSMA the house does
    not reflect it. But then again, neither would mine.

    But his home is VERY modest. Small 1950 ranch of 1288 sq ft on a 6752 sq
    ft lot. Zillow value about $525,000 and a property tax bill of about
    $7,500. But then again this is NJ.

    That's all.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 12:33:23 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-07-07 11:43, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jec6$2ugbp$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 09:42, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112j4sh$2ugbp$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages >>>>>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the >>>>>>> same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH. >>>>>>
    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >>>>>> recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various >>>>>> names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character.

    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first
    encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the
    attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    I say most of his "bragging" is lies.

    You say it...

    Yea stupid, that's what I wrote.

    ...but you have no proof, do you?

    Do you?

    You're the one making the claim.


    And it's good that you put "bragging" in quotes...

    ...because you show it isn't literally bragging at all.

    By whose rules? You got nothing and he don't like you
    anyway.



    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 12:34:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-07-07 11:56, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/7/26 11:10 AM, Alan wrote:
    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-
    huntzinger- the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's
    original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on
    webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the >>>>> same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH. >>>>
    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I
    recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various
    names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not
    fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character.

    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first
    encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the
    attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    How do you know if he is lying or not? So I looked up a few things just
    for fact checking by all concerned.


    Did some stalking.

    Got it.

    His mom (of the Delaware beach house mentioned in a long-ago CSMA post)
    died in 2024. He was brought up a Presbyterian. The obit sounds like mom
    was a wonderful person. Based on that obit she had at 4 grandchildren
    and 3 sons. Hugh is 66 years old.

    I also have his address and phone number. I will not share that info or
    the source. I looked up the home on Google Earth and it is very modest
    NJ ranch on a small corner lot. Based on foliage and street condition
    the entire area appears to be 1950-60 vintage. Narrow streets with no
    curbs, no sidewalks and small lots. Unfortunately Hugh's specific home
    is not covered in Street View but I found a confirming picture on Zillow.

    If Hugh is as well off as he has claimed to be on CSMA the house does
    not reflect it. But then again, neither would mine.

    But his home is VERY modest. Small 1950 ranch of 1288 sq ft on a 6752 sq
    ft lot. Zillow value about $525,000 and a property tax bill of about
    $7,500. But then again this is NJ.

    That's all.

    You've demonstrated your character yet again!

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Socialism is for losers@MeanDog@Snarl.Dash to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 17:32:26 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:10:09 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you.

    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the- >>>>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within

    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original >>>>>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages >>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED)
    Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the >>>> same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years
    ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I
    recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various
    names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of >>> some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character.

    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first
    encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the
    attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    He lied that he's written something that's been published. Now it
    comes out that he is a plagiarizer, too. Hughie is a dirt bag.
    --

    Two kinds of people in the USA, today

    1) Conservatives, whose glass is always half full. :)

    2) Leftists, whose glass is always half empty. :(
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 14:55:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-07-07 14:32, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:10:09 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the- >>>>>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original >>>>>>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages >>>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the >>>>> same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH. >>>>
    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I
    recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various
    names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of >>>> some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character.

    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first
    encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the
    attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    He lied that he's written something that's been published.

    No, he didn't.

    You chose noto to believe him.

    Now it
    comes out that he is a plagiarizer, too. Hughie is a dirt bag.
    I see a lot of ranting, but not a lot of proof... ...no proof at all, actually.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tom Elam@thomas.e.elam@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 18:03:50 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you.

    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the- >>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within

    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of
    published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original >>>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED)
    Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the
    NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years
    ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.


    You disparaging someone...that's irony.


    Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 15:05:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you.

    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the- >>>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within

    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of
    published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original >>>>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages >>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED)
    Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the
    NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling
    the same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21
    years ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is
    simply HH.


    You disparaging someone...that's irony.


    Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep.

    I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy.

    Truth is an absolute defence.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Skeeter@invalid@none.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 16:19:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    In article <112jka3$2ugbp$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 11:43, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jec6$2ugbp$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 09:42, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112j4sh$2ugbp$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >>>>>> recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various >>>>>> names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character. >>>>>
    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first >>>>> encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the >>>>> attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    I say most of his "bragging" is lies.

    You say it...

    Yea stupid, that's what I wrote.

    ...but you have no proof, do you?

    Do you?

    You're the one making the claim.

    And I stick by it.


    And it's good that you put "bragging" in quotes...

    ...because you show it isn't literally bragging at all.

    By whose rules? You got nothing and he don't like you
    anyway.

    And Alan runs away again.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Skeeter@invalid@none.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 16:20:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    In article <112jkc4$2ugbp$16@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 11:56, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/7/26 11:10 AM, Alan wrote:
    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-
    huntzinger- the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's >>>>>>> original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on
    webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the >>>>> same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH. >>>>
    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >>>> recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various >>>> names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not
    fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character.

    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first
    encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the
    attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    How do you know if he is lying or not? So I looked up a few things just for fact checking by all concerned.


    Did some stalking.

    Got it.

    You would if you knew how.

    His mom (of the Delaware beach house mentioned in a long-ago CSMA post) died in 2024. He was brought up a Presbyterian. The obit sounds like mom was a wonderful person. Based on that obit she had at 4 grandchildren
    and 3 sons. Hugh is 66 years old.

    I also have his address and phone number. I will not share that info or the source. I looked up the home on Google Earth and it is very modest
    NJ ranch on a small corner lot. Based on foliage and street condition
    the entire area appears to be 1950-60 vintage. Narrow streets with no curbs, no sidewalks and small lots. Unfortunately Hugh's specific home
    is not covered in Street View but I found a confirming picture on Zillow.

    If Hugh is as well off as he has claimed to be on CSMA the house does
    not reflect it. But then again, neither would mine.

    But his home is VERY modest. Small 1950 ranch of 1288 sq ft on a 6752 sq ft lot. Zillow value about $525,000 and a property tax bill of about $7,500. But then again this is NJ.

    That's all.

    You've demonstrated your character yet again!

    HH still doesn't like you.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 15:21:17 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-07-07 15:19, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jka3$2ugbp$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 11:43, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jec6$2ugbp$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 09:42, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112j4sh$2ugbp$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>>>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >>>>>>>> recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various >>>>>>>> names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character. >>>>>>>
    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first >>>>>>> encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the >>>>>>> attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    I say most of his "bragging" is lies.

    You say it...

    Yea stupid, that's what I wrote.

    ...but you have no proof, do you?

    Do you?

    You're the one making the claim.

    And I stick by it.

    Just with absolutely nothing to support it.



    And it's good that you put "bragging" in quotes...

    ...because you show it isn't literally bragging at all.

    By whose rules? You got nothing and he don't like you
    anyway.

    And Alan runs away again.

    What was there to run away from; nothing of substance.




    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Skeeter@invalid@none.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 16:22:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    In article <112jskc$35a3o$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 14:32, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:10:09 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages >>>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the >>>>> same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH. >>>>
    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >>>> recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various >>>> names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character.

    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first
    encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the
    attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    He lied that he's written something that's been published.

    No, he didn't.

    You chose noto to believe him.

    HH never proved it.

    Now it
    comes out that he is a plagiarizer, too. Hughie is a dirt bag.
    I see a lot of ranting, but not a lot of proof... ...no proof at all, actually.

    No proof HH has what he says either. In fact you also lack
    in that area.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Skeeter@invalid@none.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 16:22:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    In article <112jt6p$35a3o$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you.

    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the- >>>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within

    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original >>>>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages >>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED)
    Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling
    the same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21
    years ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is
    simply HH.


    You disparaging someone...that's irony.


    Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep.

    I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy.

    Truth is an absolute defence.

    You should try it then white flag boy.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 15:24:49 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-07-07 15:20, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jkc4$2ugbp$16@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 11:56, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/7/26 11:10 AM, Alan wrote:
    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-
    huntzinger- the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's >>>>>>>>> original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on >>>>>>>>> webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the >>>>>>> same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH. >>>>>>
    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >>>>>> recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various >>>>>> names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not
    fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character.

    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first
    encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the
    attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    How do you know if he is lying or not? So I looked up a few things just
    for fact checking by all concerned.


    Did some stalking.

    Got it.

    You would if you knew how.

    His mom (of the Delaware beach house mentioned in a long-ago CSMA post)
    died in 2024. He was brought up a Presbyterian. The obit sounds like mom >>> was a wonderful person. Based on that obit she had at 4 grandchildren
    and 3 sons. Hugh is 66 years old.

    I also have his address and phone number. I will not share that info or
    the source. I looked up the home on Google Earth and it is very modest
    NJ ranch on a small corner lot. Based on foliage and street condition
    the entire area appears to be 1950-60 vintage. Narrow streets with no
    curbs, no sidewalks and small lots. Unfortunately Hugh's specific home
    is not covered in Street View but I found a confirming picture on Zillow. >>>
    If Hugh is as well off as he has claimed to be on CSMA the house does
    not reflect it. But then again, neither would mine.

    But his home is VERY modest. Small 1950 ranch of 1288 sq ft on a 6752 sq >>> ft lot. Zillow value about $525,000 and a property tax bill of about
    $7,500. But then again this is NJ.

    That's all.

    You've demonstrated your character yet again!

    HH still doesn't like you.



    Another white flag from you!
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 15:25:16 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-07-07 15:22, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jskc$35a3o$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 14:32, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:10:09 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages >>>>>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the >>>>>>> same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH. >>>>>>
    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >>>>>> recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various >>>>>> names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character.

    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first
    encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the
    attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    He lied that he's written something that's been published.

    No, he didn't.

    You chose noto to believe him.

    HH never proved it.

    He did, actually.


    Now it
    comes out that he is a plagiarizer, too. Hughie is a dirt bag.
    I see a lot of ranting, but not a lot of proof... ...no proof at all,
    actually.

    No proof HH has what he says either. In fact you also lack
    in that area.
    Yes, but HH is CREDIBLE.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Socialism is for losers@MeanDog@Snarl.Dash to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 18:26:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 14:55:24 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-07 14:32, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:10:09 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the- >>>>>>>> plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original >>>>>>>> NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages >>>>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the >>>>>> same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH. >>>>>
    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >>>>> recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various >>>>> names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of >>>>> some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character.

    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first
    encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the
    attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    He lied that he's written something that's been published.

    No, he didn't.

    Being part of a group that published a paper is not the same as
    actually being published.

    You chose noto to believe him.

    Now it
    comes out that he is a plagiarizer, too. Hughie is a dirt bag.
    I see a lot of ranting, but not a lot of proof... ...no proof at all, >actually.

    Hughie is a braggart, so are you.
    --

    Two kinds of people in the USA, today

    1) Conservatives, whose glass is always half full. :)

    2) Leftists, whose glass is always half empty. :(
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Skeeter@invalid@none.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 17:23:34 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    In article <112jubh$35a4u$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 15:20, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jkc4$2ugbp$16@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 11:56, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/7/26 11:10 AM, Alan wrote:
    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-
    huntzinger- the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's >>>>>>>>> original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on >>>>>>>>> webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >>>>>> recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various >>>>>> names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not
    fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character. >>>>>
    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first >>>>> encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the >>>>> attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    How do you know if he is lying or not? So I looked up a few things just >>> for fact checking by all concerned.


    Did some stalking.

    Got it.

    You would if you knew how.

    His mom (of the Delaware beach house mentioned in a long-ago CSMA post) >>> died in 2024. He was brought up a Presbyterian. The obit sounds like mom >>> was a wonderful person. Based on that obit she had at 4 grandchildren
    and 3 sons. Hugh is 66 years old.

    I also have his address and phone number. I will not share that info or >>> the source. I looked up the home on Google Earth and it is very modest >>> NJ ranch on a small corner lot. Based on foliage and street condition
    the entire area appears to be 1950-60 vintage. Narrow streets with no
    curbs, no sidewalks and small lots. Unfortunately Hugh's specific home >>> is not covered in Street View but I found a confirming picture on Zillow. >>>
    If Hugh is as well off as he has claimed to be on CSMA the house does
    not reflect it. But then again, neither would mine.

    But his home is VERY modest. Small 1950 ranch of 1288 sq ft on a 6752 sq >>> ft lot. Zillow value about $525,000 and a property tax bill of about
    $7,500. But then again this is NJ.

    That's all.

    You've demonstrated your character yet again!

    HH still doesn't like you.



    Another white flag from you!

    And I have slapped you into reruns and avoiding again.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Skeeter@invalid@none.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 17:24:25 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    In article <112ju4u$35a4u$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 15:19, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jka3$2ugbp$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 11:43, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jec6$2ugbp$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 09:42, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112j4sh$2ugbp$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of
    published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the
    NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years
    ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I
    recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various
    names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character. >>>>>>>
    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first >>>>>>> encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the >>>>>>> attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    I say most of his "bragging" is lies.

    You say it...

    Yea stupid, that's what I wrote.

    ...but you have no proof, do you?

    Do you?

    You're the one making the claim.

    And I stick by it.

    Just with absolutely nothing to support it.

    No need. This isn't a curt of law and you don't matter.



    And it's good that you put "bragging" in quotes...

    ...because you show it isn't literally bragging at all.

    By whose rules? You got nothing and he don't like you
    anyway.

    And Alan runs away again.

    What was there to run away from; nothing of substance.

    Yet you felt the need to butt in.




    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Skeeter@invalid@none.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 17:25:15 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    In article <112jucc$35a4u$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 15:22, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jskc$35a3o$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 14:32, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:10:09 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >>>>>> recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various >>>>>> names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character. >>>>>
    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first >>>>> encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the >>>>> attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    He lied that he's written something that's been published.

    No, he didn't.

    You chose noto to believe him.

    HH never proved it.

    He did, actually.

    No he didn't.


    Now it
    comes out that he is a plagiarizer, too. Hughie is a dirt bag.
    I see a lot of ranting, but not a lot of proof... ...no proof at all,
    actually.

    No proof HH has what he says either. In fact you also lack
    in that area.
    Yes, but HH is CREDIBLE.

    How so? I can make up a lot of lies too.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Skeeter@invalid@none.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Jul 7 17:27:16 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    In article <o8vq4l94eleslee5jk75taj4q05fvjlblk@4ax.com>,
    MeanDog@Snarl.Dash says...

    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 14:55:24 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-07 14:32, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:10:09 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the >>>>>> same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH. >>>>>
    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >>>>> recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various >>>>> names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character.

    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first
    encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the
    attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    He lied that he's written something that's been published.

    No, he didn't.

    Being part of a group that published a paper is not the same as
    actually being published.

    You chose noto to believe him.

    Now it
    comes out that he is a plagiarizer, too. Hughie is a dirt bag.
    I see a lot of ranting, but not a lot of proof... ...no proof at all, >actually.

    Hughie is a braggart, so are you.

    What's funny is Alan slurps HH yet HH doesn't even like
    him. Talk about begging for friendship.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tom Elam@thomas.e.elam@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Jul 8 07:20:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you.

    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger- >>>>>> the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within

    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's
    original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages >>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED)
    Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling
    the same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21
    years ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is
    simply HH.


    You disparaging someone...that's irony.


    Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep.

    I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy.

    Truth is an absolute defence.

    You lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person as "Liarboy" is
    disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly for decades.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Jul 8 10:41:06 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-07-07 16:24, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112ju4u$35a4u$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 15:19, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jka3$2ugbp$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 11:43, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jec6$2ugbp$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 09:42, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112j4sh$2ugbp$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of
    published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the
    NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years
    ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I
    recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various
    names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character. >>>>>>>>>
    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first >>>>>>>>> encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the >>>>>>>>> attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    I say most of his "bragging" is lies.

    You say it...

    Yea stupid, that's what I wrote.

    ...but you have no proof, do you?

    Do you?

    You're the one making the claim.

    And I stick by it.

    Just with absolutely nothing to support it.

    No need. This isn't a curt of law and you don't matter.

    If that were true, you wouldn't have replied.




    And it's good that you put "bragging" in quotes...

    ...because you show it isn't literally bragging at all.

    By whose rules? You got nothing and he don't like you
    anyway.

    And Alan runs away again.

    What was there to run away from; nothing of substance.

    Yet you felt the need to butt in.
    The irony of that statement...
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Jul 8 10:41:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-07-07 16:25, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jucc$35a4u$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 15:22, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jskc$35a3o$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 14:32, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:10:09 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>>>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >>>>>>>> recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various >>>>>>>> names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character. >>>>>>>
    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first >>>>>>> encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the >>>>>>> attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    He lied that he's written something that's been published.

    No, he didn't.

    You chose noto to believe him.

    HH never proved it.

    He did, actually.

    No he didn't.

    Yes. He actually did.



    Now it
    comes out that he is a plagiarizer, too. Hughie is a dirt bag.
    I see a lot of ranting, but not a lot of proof... ...no proof at all,
    actually.

    No proof HH has what he says either. In fact you also lack
    in that area.
    Yes, but HH is CREDIBLE.

    How so? I can make up a lot of lies too.
    I know you can.

    And you DO.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Jul 8 10:42:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-07-07 15:26, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 14:55:24 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-07 14:32, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:10:09 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages >>>>>>>>> without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the >>>>>>> same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH. >>>>>>
    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >>>>>> recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various >>>>>> names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character.

    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first
    encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the
    attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    He lied that he's written something that's been published.

    No, he didn't.

    Being part of a group that published a paper is not the same as
    actually being published.

    That is EXACTLY being published.


    You chose noto to believe him.

    Now it
    comes out that he is a plagiarizer, too. Hughie is a dirt bag.
    I see a lot of ranting, but not a lot of proof... ...no proof at all,
    actually.

    Hughie is a braggart, so are you.
    Stating one's relevant experiences in a argument is not bragging.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Jul 8 10:42:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-
    huntzinger- the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's
    original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on
    webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling
    the same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21
    years ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is
    simply HH.


    You disparaging someone...that's irony.


    Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep.

    I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy.

    Truth is an absolute defence.

    You lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person as "Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly for decades.

    Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Skeeter@invalid@none.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Jul 8 12:25:40 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    In article <112m23i$3qgc4$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 16:24, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112ju4u$35a4u$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 15:19, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jka3$2ugbp$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 11:43, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jec6$2ugbp$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 09:42, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112j4sh$2ugbp$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you.

    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within

    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of
    published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED)
    Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the
    NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years
    ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I
    recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various
    names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character. >>>>>>>>>
    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first >>>>>>>>> encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the >>>>>>>>> attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    I say most of his "bragging" is lies.

    You say it...

    Yea stupid, that's what I wrote.

    ...but you have no proof, do you?

    Do you?

    You're the one making the claim.

    And I stick by it.

    Just with absolutely nothing to support it.

    No need. This isn't a curt of law and you don't matter.

    If that were true, you wouldn't have replied.

    That made no sense at all and it's only Wed. You are
    preparing your exit.




    And it's good that you put "bragging" in quotes...

    ...because you show it isn't literally bragging at all.

    By whose rules? You got nothing and he don't like you
    anyway.

    And Alan runs away again.

    What was there to run away from; nothing of substance.

    Yet you felt the need to butt in.
    The irony of that statement...

    Yet here you are butting in again.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Skeeter@invalid@none.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Jul 8 12:27:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    In article <112m24j$3qgc4$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 16:25, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jucc$35a4u$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 15:22, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jskc$35a3o$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 14:32, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:10:09 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of
    published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the
    NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years
    ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I
    recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various
    names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character. >>>>>>>
    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first >>>>>>> encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the >>>>>>> attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    He lied that he's written something that's been published.

    No, he didn't.

    You chose noto to believe him.

    HH never proved it.

    He did, actually.

    No he didn't.

    Yes. He actually did.

    No, like you he spun and ran.



    Now it
    comes out that he is a plagiarizer, too. Hughie is a dirt bag.
    I see a lot of ranting, but not a lot of proof... ...no proof at all, >>>> actually.

    No proof HH has what he says either. In fact you also lack
    in that area.
    Yes, but HH is CREDIBLE.

    How so? I can make up a lot of lies too.
    I know you can.

    And you DO.


    Yet you have never proven me wrong. The spin noted but the
    fact remains you and HH are full of shit.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Skeeter@invalid@none.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Jul 8 12:27:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    In article <112m260$3qgc4$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 15:26, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 14:55:24 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-07 14:32, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:10:09 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >>>>>> recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various >>>>>> names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character. >>>>>
    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first >>>>> encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the >>>>> attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    He lied that he's written something that's been published.

    No, he didn't.

    Being part of a group that published a paper is not the same as
    actually being published.

    That is EXACTLY being published.

    By others and not him.


    You chose noto to believe him.

    Now it
    comes out that he is a plagiarizer, too. Hughie is a dirt bag.
    I see a lot of ranting, but not a lot of proof... ...no proof at all,
    actually.

    Hughie is a braggart, so are you.
    Stating one's relevant experiences in a argument is not bragging.

    Lies just make you look silly. Stop doing it.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Skeeter@invalid@none.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Jul 8 12:28:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    In article <112m26u$3qgc4$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-
    huntzinger- the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's >>>>>>> original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on
    webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling >>>>> the same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 >>>>> years ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is >>>>> simply HH.


    You disparaging someone...that's irony.


    Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep.

    I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy.

    Truth is an absolute defence.

    You lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person as "Liarboy" is disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly for decades.

    Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy.

    So that must be your new nickname? Who did you steal liar
    boy from?
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Socialism is for losers@MeanDog@Snarl.Dash to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Jul 8 14:52:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Wed, 8 Jul 2026 10:42:24 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-07 15:26, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 14:55:24 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-07 14:32, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:10:09 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the >>>>>>>> same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH. >>>>>>>
    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >>>>>>> recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various >>>>>>> names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character. >>>>>>
    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first >>>>>> encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the >>>>>> attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    He lied that he's written something that's been published.

    No, he didn't.

    Being part of a group that published a paper is not the same as
    actually being published.

    That is EXACTLY being published.

    No, that's being a member of a group that published a paper. Hughie
    can't demonstrate that he wrote or had anything to do with the paper
    that got published. He can't demonstrate that he has any knowledge of
    the issue on that paper.

    You chose noto to believe him.

    Now it
    comes out that he is a plagiarizer, too. Hughie is a dirt bag.
    I see a lot of ranting, but not a lot of proof... ...no proof at all,
    actually.

    Hughie is a braggart, so are you.
    Stating one's relevant experiences in a argument is not bragging.

    Of course it is.
    --

    Two kinds of people in the USA, today

    1) Conservatives, whose glass is always half full. :)

    2) Leftists, whose glass is always half empty. :(
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From pothead@pothead@snakebite.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Jul 8 21:41:23 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-07-08, Socialism is for losers <MeanDog@Snarl.Dash> wrote:
    On Wed, 8 Jul 2026 10:42:24 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-07 15:26, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 14:55:24 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-07 14:32, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:10:09 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>>>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >>>>>>>> recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various >>>>>>>> names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character. >>>>>>>
    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first >>>>>>> encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the >>>>>>> attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    He lied that he's written something that's been published.

    No, he didn't.

    Being part of a group that published a paper is not the same as
    actually being published.

    That is EXACTLY being published.

    No, that's being a member of a group that published a paper. Hughie
    can't demonstrate that he wrote or had anything to do with the paper
    that got published. He can't demonstrate that he has any knowledge of
    the issue on that paper.

    You chose noto to believe him.

    Now it
    comes out that he is a plagiarizer, too. Hughie is a dirt bag.
    I see a lot of ranting, but not a lot of proof... ...no proof at all,
    actually.

    Hughie is a braggart, so are you.
    Stating one's relevant experiences in a argument is not bragging.

    Of course it is.
    --

    Two kinds of people in the USA, today

    1) Conservatives, whose glass is always half full. :)

    2) Leftists, whose glass is always half empty. :(

    As I have stated before, my real name is mentioned several times in
    the Bible. So did I have a part in writing it as an author?
    I may be Divine, but not THAT Divine. lol
    --
    pothead

    "The goal of socialism is Communism"
    -- Vladimir Lenin

    "Communism may be summed up in a single sentence: 'Abolition of private property"
    -- Karl Marx

    "The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other
    people's money"
    -- Margaret Thatcher
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Jul 8 16:50:31 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-07-08 11:25, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112m23i$3qgc4$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 16:24, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112ju4u$35a4u$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 15:19, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jka3$2ugbp$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 11:43, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jec6$2ugbp$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 09:42, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112j4sh$2ugbp$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you.

    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within

    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of
    published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED)
    Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the
    NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years
    ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I
    recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various
    names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character. >>>>>>>>>>>
    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first >>>>>>>>>>> encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the >>>>>>>>>>> attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    I say most of his "bragging" is lies.

    You say it...

    Yea stupid, that's what I wrote.

    ...but you have no proof, do you?

    Do you?

    You're the one making the claim.

    And I stick by it.

    Just with absolutely nothing to support it.

    No need. This isn't a curt of law and you don't matter.

    If that were true, you wouldn't have replied.

    That made no sense at all and it's only Wed. You are
    preparing your exit.

    The irony of you writing this...





    And it's good that you put "bragging" in quotes...

    ...because you show it isn't literally bragging at all.

    By whose rules? You got nothing and he don't like you
    anyway.

    And Alan runs away again.

    What was there to run away from; nothing of substance.

    Yet you felt the need to butt in.
    The irony of that statement...

    Yet here you are butting in again.



    ...and ending with this.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Jul 8 16:50:50 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-07-08 11:27, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112m24j$3qgc4$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 16:25, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jucc$35a4u$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 15:22, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jskc$35a3o$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 14:32, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:10:09 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of
    published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the
    NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years
    ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I
    recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various
    names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character. >>>>>>>>>
    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first >>>>>>>>> encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the >>>>>>>>> attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    He lied that he's written something that's been published.

    No, he didn't.

    You chose noto to believe him.

    HH never proved it.

    He did, actually.

    No he didn't.

    Yes. He actually did.

    No, like you he spun and ran.



    Now it
    comes out that he is a plagiarizer, too. Hughie is a dirt bag.
    I see a lot of ranting, but not a lot of proof... ...no proof at all, >>>>>> actually.

    No proof HH has what he says either. In fact you also lack
    in that area.
    Yes, but HH is CREDIBLE.

    How so? I can make up a lot of lies too.
    I know you can.

    And you DO.


    Yet you have never proven me wrong. The spin noted but the
    fact remains you and HH are full of shit.

    I've proven you wrong lots, Cupcake.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Jul 8 16:51:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-07-08 11:27, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112m260$3qgc4$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 15:26, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 14:55:24 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-07 14:32, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:10:09 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>>>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >>>>>>>> recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various >>>>>>>> names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character. >>>>>>>
    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first >>>>>>> encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the >>>>>>> attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    He lied that he's written something that's been published.

    No, he didn't.

    Being part of a group that published a paper is not the same as
    actually being published.

    That is EXACTLY being published.

    By others and not him.

    Why are the "others" more published than him.

    They are literally all "part" of the same "group".



    You chose noto to believe him.

    Now it
    comes out that he is a plagiarizer, too. Hughie is a dirt bag.
    I see a lot of ranting, but not a lot of proof... ...no proof at all,
    actually.

    Hughie is a braggart, so are you.
    Stating one's relevant experiences in a argument is not bragging.

    Lies just make you look silly. Stop doing it.

    I've never once lied about anything I've accomplished.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Jul 8 16:52:55 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-07-08 11:52, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Wed, 8 Jul 2026 10:42:24 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-07 15:26, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 14:55:24 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-07 14:32, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:10:09 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>>>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >>>>>>>> recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various >>>>>>>> names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character. >>>>>>>
    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first >>>>>>> encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the >>>>>>> attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    He lied that he's written something that's been published.

    No, he didn't.

    Being part of a group that published a paper is not the same as
    actually being published.

    That is EXACTLY being published.

    No, that's being a member of a group that published a paper. Hughie
    can't demonstrate that he wrote or had anything to do with the paper
    that got published. He can't demonstrate that he has any knowledge of
    the issue on that paper.

    And by that logic, none of the others can demonstrate it either...

    ...and the paper just magically came into existence.


    You chose noto to believe him.

    Now it
    comes out that he is a plagiarizer, too. Hughie is a dirt bag.
    I see a lot of ranting, but not a lot of proof... ...no proof at all,
    actually.

    Hughie is a braggart, so are you.
    Stating one's relevant experiences in a argument is not bragging.

    Of course it is.
    Nope.

    It's CONTEXT.

    When I talk about racing cars, the fact that I've actually DONE it is relevant.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Skeeter@invalid@none.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Jul 8 17:55:06 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    In article <112mnor$o8i$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
    says...

    On 2026-07-08 11:27, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112m24j$3qgc4$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 16:25, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jucc$35a4u$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 15:22, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112jskc$35a3o$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 14:32, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:10:09 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you.

    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within

    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of
    published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED)
    Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the
    NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years
    ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I
    recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various
    names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character. >>>>>>>>>
    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first >>>>>>>>> encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the >>>>>>>>> attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    He lied that he's written something that's been published.

    No, he didn't.

    You chose noto to believe him.

    HH never proved it.

    He did, actually.

    No he didn't.

    Yes. He actually did.

    No, like you he spun and ran.



    Now it
    comes out that he is a plagiarizer, too. Hughie is a dirt bag. >>>>>> I see a lot of ranting, but not a lot of proof... ...no proof at all, >>>>>> actually.

    No proof HH has what he says either. In fact you also lack
    in that area.
    Yes, but HH is CREDIBLE.

    How so? I can make up a lot of lies too.
    I know you can.

    And you DO.


    Yet you have never proven me wrong. The spin noted but the
    fact remains you and HH are full of shit.

    I've proven you wrong lots, Cupcake.

    Nope.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T21hSKREXGk
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Skeeter@invalid@none.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Jul 8 17:57:47 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    In article <112mnqf$o8i$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
    says...

    On 2026-07-08 11:27, Skeeter wrote:
    In article <112m260$3qgc4$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-
    uh@nope.com says...

    On 2026-07-07 15:26, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 14:55:24 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-07 14:32, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:10:09 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of
    published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the
    NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years
    ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I
    recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various
    names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character. >>>>>>>
    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first >>>>>>> encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the >>>>>>> attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    He lied that he's written something that's been published.

    No, he didn't.

    Being part of a group that published a paper is not the same as
    actually being published.

    That is EXACTLY being published.

    By others and not him.

    Why are the "others" more published than him.

    Who said they were?

    They are literally all "part" of the same "group".

    Yea, a bunch of people sharing ideas. Hardly a Pulitzer
    Prize.



    You chose noto to believe him.

    Now it
    comes out that he is a plagiarizer, too. Hughie is a dirt bag.
    I see a lot of ranting, but not a lot of proof... ...no proof at all, >>>> actually.

    Hughie is a braggart, so are you.
    Stating one's relevant experiences in a argument is not bragging.

    Lies just make you look silly. Stop doing it.

    I've never once lied about anything I've accomplished.

    You have never proven any of it either.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Socialism is for losers@MeanDog@Snarl.Dash to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Thu Jul 9 04:01:06 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Wed, 8 Jul 2026 16:52:55 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-08 11:52, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Wed, 8 Jul 2026 10:42:24 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-07 15:26, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 14:55:24 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-07 14:32, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:10:09 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of
    published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the
    NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>>>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>>>>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >>>>>>>>> recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various >>>>>>>>> names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character. >>>>>>>>
    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first >>>>>>>> encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the >>>>>>>> attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    He lied that he's written something that's been published.

    No, he didn't.

    Being part of a group that published a paper is not the same as
    actually being published.

    That is EXACTLY being published.

    No, that's being a member of a group that published a paper. Hughie
    can't demonstrate that he wrote or had anything to do with the paper
    that got published. He can't demonstrate that he has any knowledge of
    the issue on that paper.

    And by that logic, none of the others can demonstrate it either...

    Indeed, but I don't think any of the more important people in that
    group were needing to brag about being published.

    ...and the paper just magically came into existence.


    You chose noto to believe him.

    Now it
    comes out that he is a plagiarizer, too. Hughie is a dirt bag.
    I see a lot of ranting, but not a lot of proof... ...no proof at all, >>>>> actually.

    Hughie is a braggart, so are you.
    Stating one's relevant experiences in a argument is not bragging.

    Of course it is.
    Nope.

    It's CONTEXT.

    When I talk about racing cars, the fact that I've actually DONE it is >relevant.

    "To talk or write about oneself in a proud or self-impressed way" https://www.thefreedictionary.com/brag

    Even what you just posted above is an attempt to brag, albeit a poor
    attempt considering that you're only an amateur, and from what I can
    tell, not a particularly successful one.

    Your "instructor" brag takes the poor attempt a step further because
    simply having instructed someone else doesn't address if your
    understanding of the issue is substantial. I've come across more than
    on poor "instructor" in my lifetime. The fact that you are unaware of
    the subconscious element involved in driving indicates that you do
    lack knowledge on the subject.

    In another thread I posted an article from another race car driver who
    appeared to have more experience as well as more racing success than
    you. He understands and explains the subconscious issue pretty well.

    Here's a chance for you to better your instructing and your driving
    abilities. https://www.roadandtrack.com/motorsports/a29354/conscious-unconscious-thought-racing/
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Skeeter@invalid@none.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Thu Jul 9 08:08:55 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    In article <112mnsn$o8i$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
    says...

    On 2026-07-08 11:52, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Wed, 8 Jul 2026 10:42:24 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-07 15:26, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 14:55:24 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-07 14:32, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:10:09 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-huntzinger-the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of
    published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the
    NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro
    thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years
    ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I
    recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various
    names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character. >>>>>>>
    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first >>>>>>> encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the >>>>>>> attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    He lied that he's written something that's been published.

    No, he didn't.

    Being part of a group that published a paper is not the same as
    actually being published.

    That is EXACTLY being published.

    No, that's being a member of a group that published a paper. Hughie
    can't demonstrate that he wrote or had anything to do with the paper
    that got published. He can't demonstrate that he has any knowledge of
    the issue on that paper.

    And by that logic, none of the others can demonstrate it either...

    ...and the paper just magically came into existence.

    Nice spin. Where is the proof he had anything to do with
    it.


    You chose noto to believe him.

    Now it
    comes out that he is a plagiarizer, too. Hughie is a dirt bag.
    I see a lot of ranting, but not a lot of proof... ...no proof at all, >>>> actually.

    Hughie is a braggart, so are you.
    Stating one's relevant experiences in a argument is not bragging.

    Of course it is.
    Nope.

    It's CONTEXT.

    When I talk about racing cars, the fact that I've actually DONE it is relevant.

    You're bragging.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tom Elam@thomas.e.elam@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Thu Jul 9 14:45:47 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 7/8/26 1:42 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2026-07-08 04:20, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/7/26 6:05 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2026-07-07 15:03, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/6/26 6:35 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2026-07-05 11:00, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-
    huntzinger- the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's >>>>>>>> original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on
    webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling >>>>>> the same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 >>>>>> years ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is >>>>>> simply HH.


    You disparaging someone...that's irony.


    Me, the frequent victim of your disparaging, yep.

    I've never once disparaged you, Liarboy.

    Truth is an absolute defence.

    You lied in the sentence above. Labeling a person as "Liarboy" is
    disparaging. And you have done it repeatedly for decades.

    Not when the person is a liar, Liarboy.

    It is when someone makes up an excuse for calling something a lie.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tom Elam@thomas.e.elam@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Fri Jul 10 17:45:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 7/7/26 3:34 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2026-07-07 11:56, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/7/26 11:10 AM, Alan wrote:
    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-
    huntzinger- the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba
    thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives of >>>>>>>> published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's >>>>>>>> original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on
    webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had the >>>>>>>> NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh
    Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a necro >>>>>>> thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling >>>>>> the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21 years >>>>>> ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is simply >>>>>> HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that I >>>>> recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the various >>>>> names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not
    fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character.

    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first
    encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the
    attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    How do you know if he is lying or not? So I looked up a few things
    just for fact checking by all concerned.


    Did some stalking.

    Got it.

    His mom (of the Delaware beach house mentioned in a long-ago CSMA
    post) died in 2024. He was brought up a Presbyterian. The obit sounds
    like mom was a wonderful person. Based on that obit she had at 4
    grandchildren and 3 sons. Hugh is 66 years old.

    I also have his address and phone number. I will not share that info
    or the source. I looked up the home on Google Earth and it is very
    modest NJ ranch on a small corner lot. Based on foliage and street
    condition the entire area appears to be 1950-60 vintage. Narrow
    streets with no curbs, no sidewalks and small lots. Unfortunately
    Hugh's specific home is not covered in Street View but I found a
    confirming picture on Zillow.

    If Hugh is as well off as he has claimed to be on CSMA the house does
    not reflect it. But then again, neither would mine.

    But his home is VERY modest. Small 1950 ranch of 1288 sq ft on a 6752
    sq ft lot. Zillow value about $525,000 and a property tax bill of
    about $7,500. But then again this is NJ.

    That's all.

    You've demonstrated your character yet again!


    Not really. Demonstrated is how much you can find out about people now
    with very little effort. Which of course you do not like. As in you have
    lived in a tiny condo 500 sq foot for decades and driven old cars, one
    of which your brother sold you. That condo is worth what it is only
    because you chose to live in one of the most expensive housing market in
    North America. Try selling and buying a single family home in west
    Vancouver.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From c186282@c186282@nnada.ne to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Jul 11 01:52:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/7/26 3:34 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2026-07-07 11:56, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 7/7/26 11:10 AM, Alan wrote:
    On 2026-07-06 15:58, Socialism is for losers wrote:
    On 05 Jul 2026 20:08:34 GMT, Glock <glock@localhost.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 14:00:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote:

    On 7/4/26 11:54 PM, Kanan Gupta wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 01:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
    Joe Johnson <aintewnoemail@aol.com> wrote:

    Scooby-Dooby-Doo make sure this stalker doesn't impersonate you. >>>>>>>>>
    <https://rec.scuba.locations.narkive.com/h34DhVnd/hugh-
    huntzinger- the-
    plagiariser-name-smearer-exposed>


    This is a REVISED posting of a subthread, within a rec.scuba >>>>>>>>> thread/post:

    "Grudge Holder Hugh (NED) Huntzinger EXPOSED once again", within >>>>>>>>>
    "DF reveals the Dysfunctional Gang on a hook"



    H. Huntzinger, the Army peon who asked Bob Ling for the archives >>>>>>>>> of published NED (back in 1993), stole and plagiarist Bob Ling's >>>>>>>>> original
    NED FAQ (circa 1994) , published his plagiarized versions on >>>>>>>>> webpages
    without acknowledgement, and used the posting name of Hugh (NED) >>>>>>>>> Huntzinger to mislead people into thinking that he actually had >>>>>>>>> the NED (Network of Egghead Divers) HUMOR and NED spirit.

    This was the ORIGINAL version:

    http://tinyurl.com/5oj4b

    400 fucking lines and no explanation of who the fuck this Hugh >>>>>>>> Huntzinger is and why I need to be concerned.
    And the fucking post is 21 fucking years old.
    Hugh is probably dead by now anyway. Talk about dredging up a
    necro thread.




    The dead part is not correct. Hugh is still lurking around pulling >>>>>>> the
    same crap but the audience has shrunk to a tiny fraction of 21
    years ago. He is not using the NED moniker these days. His sig is >>>>>>> simply HH.

    So the post is accurate?
    I began reading it but got confused as the only name mentioned that >>>>>> I recognize is Hugh and it's difficult to keep track of all the
    various names in the thread.

    If the accusations in that post are actually real and not
    fabrications of
    some usenet kook, then Hugh sounds like quite the nasty character.

    I spotted Hughie's phony dishonest "look_at_me" status when I first
    encountered him months ago. He'll lie, cheat, and steal to get the
    attention he thinks he deserves, but never receives.
    What do you claim he's lied about?

    How do you know if he is lying or not? So I looked up a few things
    just for fact checking by all concerned.


    Did some stalking.

    Got it.

    His mom (of the Delaware beach house mentioned in a long-ago CSMA
    post) died in 2024. He was brought up a Presbyterian. The obit sounds
    like mom was a wonderful person. Based on that obit she had at 4
    grandchildren and 3 sons. Hugh is 66 years old.

    I also have his address and phone number. I will not share that info
    or the source. I looked up the home on Google Earth and it is very
    modest NJ ranch on a small corner lot. Based on foliage and street
    condition the entire area appears to be 1950-60 vintage. Narrow
    streets with no curbs, no sidewalks and small lots. Unfortunately
    Hugh's specific home is not covered in Street View but I found a
    confirming picture on Zillow.

    If Hugh is as well off as he has claimed to be on CSMA the house does
    not reflect it. But then again, neither would mine.

    But his home is VERY modest. Small 1950 ranch of 1288 sq ft on a 6752
    sq ft lot. Zillow value about $525,000 and a property tax bill of
    about $7,500. But then again this is NJ.

    That's all.

    You've demonstrated your character yet again!


    Not really. Demonstrated is how much you can find out about people now
    with very little effort. Which of course you do not like. As in you have >lived in a tiny condo 500 sq foot for decades and driven old cars, one
    of which your brother sold you. That condo is worth what it is only
    because you chose to live in one of the most expensive housing market in >North America. Try selling and buying a single family home in west >Vancouver.


    I would love to have anal sex with the President but my posts offering my
    dick go unanswered on TruthSocial.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2