Brazil's Age Verification Law is in Effect, Ubuntu Being Monitored for Compliance
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/brazils-age-verification-law-is-in>
Brazil monitoring 37 companies, including Canonical, Valve, & more.
System76 bans users for asking about age verification. Rockstar Games &
Arch Linux 32 restrict access in Brazil.
My take: The age of privacy is now effectively over. If you use Linux,
it will be because you truly believe that it is a superior operating
system, not because you believe that it will improve your privacy or security.
On 2026-03-17, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Brazil's Age Verification Law is in Effect, Ubuntu Being Monitored for
Compliance
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/brazils-age-verification-law-is-in>
Brazil monitoring 37 companies, including Canonical, Valve, & more.
System76 bans users for asking about age verification. Rockstar Games &
Arch Linux 32 restrict access in Brazil.
My take: The age of privacy is now effectively over. If you use Linux,
it will be because you truly believe that it is a superior operating
system, not because you believe that it will improve your privacy or
security.
More build-up for the world-wide Electronic Gulag. That's the real reason corporations are so crazed about this AI bullshit. I hope Iran knocks some more server farms while they're at it.
More build-up for the world-wide Electronic Gulag. That's the real
reason corporations are so crazed about this AI bullshit. I hope Iran
knocks some more server farms while they're at it.
On 2026-03-17 6:10 p.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-17, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Brazil's Age Verification Law is in Effect, Ubuntu Being Monitored for
Compliance
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/brazils-age-verification-law-is-in>
Brazil monitoring 37 companies, including Canonical, Valve, & more.
System76 bans users for asking about age verification. Rockstar Games &
Arch Linux 32 restrict access in Brazil.
My take: The age of privacy is now effectively over. If you use Linux,
it will be because you truly believe that it is a superior operating
system, not because you believe that it will improve your privacy or
security.
More build-up for the world-wide Electronic Gulag. That's the real reason
corporations are so crazed about this AI bullshit. I hope Iran knocks some >> more server farms while they're at it.
I don't believe that Iran will be doing much more damage going forward.
As much as the media wants us to believe that the US and Israel are
failing miserably over there, there is no substance whatsoever to their claims.
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 22:10:09 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
More build-up for the world-wide Electronic Gulag. That's the real
reason corporations are so crazed about this AI bullshit. I hope Iran
knocks some more server farms while they're at it.
https://www.kpax.com/news/missoula-county/small-ai-data-center-proposed- for-bonner-mill-industrial-park
Just a little bitty one. The natives are restless. They just shot down a
new truck stop in that area and are moving on this proposal.
Brazil's Age Verification Law is in Effect, Ubuntu Being Monitored for >Compliance
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/brazils-age-verification-law-is-in>
Brazil monitoring 37 companies, including Canonical, Valve, & more.
System76 bans users for asking about age verification. Rockstar Games &
Arch Linux 32 restrict access in Brazil.
My take: The age of privacy is now effectively over. If you use Linux,
it will be because you truly believe that it is a superior operating
system, not because you believe that it will improve your privacy or >security.
On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-17 6:10 p.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-17, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Brazil's Age Verification Law is in Effect, Ubuntu Being Monitored for >>>> Compliance
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/brazils-age-verification-law-is-in>
Brazil monitoring 37 companies, including Canonical, Valve, & more.
System76 bans users for asking about age verification. Rockstar Games & >>>> Arch Linux 32 restrict access in Brazil.
My take: The age of privacy is now effectively over. If you use Linux, >>>> it will be because you truly believe that it is a superior operating
system, not because you believe that it will improve your privacy or
security.
More build-up for the world-wide Electronic Gulag. That's the real reason >>> corporations are so crazed about this AI bullshit. I hope Iran knocks some >>> more server farms while they're at it.
I don't believe that Iran will be doing much more damage going forward.
As much as the media wants us to believe that the US and Israel are
failing miserably over there, there is no substance whatsoever to their
claims.
I think you're mistaken here. I've seen the satellite images. There's basically no radars or working U.S. bases left in the Gulf (or even Jordan). And now they're hitting Israel after yet another "decapitation" murder by
the genocidal Zionists. I know the Strait of Hormuz is still closed (to all but the Chinese, it seems). Meanwhile the U.S. is keeping their battle ships far out of range, while Trump (who claims the Iranians are decimated) is whining that no one in NATO will help. (He wants their ships to get blown up.) So which is it? Are the Iranians defeated, or does Trump need the help of the NATO countries (the ones he keeps leveling tariffs on and insulting). If the war is over, why does NATO matter to him? It doesn't add up.
On 2026-03-18 3:41 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-17 6:10 p.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-17, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Brazil's Age Verification Law is in Effect, Ubuntu Being Monitored for >>>>> Compliance
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/brazils-age-verification-law-is-in>
Brazil monitoring 37 companies, including Canonical, Valve, & more.
System76 bans users for asking about age verification. Rockstar Games & >>>>> Arch Linux 32 restrict access in Brazil.
My take: The age of privacy is now effectively over. If you use Linux, >>>>> it will be because you truly believe that it is a superior operating >>>>> system, not because you believe that it will improve your privacy or >>>>> security.
More build-up for the world-wide Electronic Gulag. That's the real reason >>>> corporations are so crazed about this AI bullshit. I hope Iran knocks some >>>> more server farms while they're at it.
I don't believe that Iran will be doing much more damage going forward.
As much as the media wants us to believe that the US and Israel are
failing miserably over there, there is no substance whatsoever to their
claims.
I think you're mistaken here. I've seen the satellite images. There's
basically no radars or working U.S. bases left in the Gulf (or even Jordan). >> And now they're hitting Israel after yet another "decapitation" murder by
the genocidal Zionists. I know the Strait of Hormuz is still closed (to all >> but the Chinese, it seems). Meanwhile the U.S. is keeping their battle ships >> far out of range, while Trump (who claims the Iranians are decimated) is
whining that no one in NATO will help. (He wants their ships to get blown
up.) So which is it? Are the Iranians defeated, or does Trump need the help >> of the NATO countries (the ones he keeps leveling tariffs on and insulting). >> If the war is over, why does NATO matter to him? It doesn't add up.
As I explained to my wife, NATO allies stepping to defend the Strait is evidence that there is still a point to there even being a NATO. If the United States is to be tasked with defending the European "allies," they should at least be willing to help Americans in this one task. If they
are unwilling to do so, NATO might as well cease to exist.
I shouldn't complain though, our
rates are still much lower than most of the country. Most of the power
is generated by damns that were built years ago.
On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 07:49:12 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:===== heh heh
I shouldn't complain though, our
rates are still much lower than most of the country. Most of the power
is generated by damns that were built years ago.
The governor at the time, Racicot, was big on deregulation. What that achieved was de-industrialization as the aluminum foundries and pulp mill couldn't afford the deregulated power. He went on to become a lobbyist.
When he endorsed Biden over Trump the state Republicans told him to FOAD.
CrudeSausage wrote:
Brazil's Age Verification Law is in Effect, Ubuntu Being Monitored for >>Compliance
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/brazils-age-verification-law-is-in>
Brazil monitoring 37 companies, including Canonical, Valve, & more. >>System76 bans users for asking about age verification. Rockstar Games & >>Arch Linux 32 restrict access in Brazil.
My take: The age of privacy is now effectively over. If you use Linux,
it will be because you truly believe that it is a superior operating >>system, not because you believe that it will improve your privacy or >>security.
How can they possibly prevent Canonical, or anyone else, from offering downloads without this garbage? They can't.
On 2026-03-18 3:41 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-17 6:10 p.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-17, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Brazil's Age Verification Law is in Effect, Ubuntu Being Monitored for >>>>> Compliance
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/brazils-age-verification-law-is-in>
Brazil monitoring 37 companies, including Canonical, Valve, & more.
System76 bans users for asking about age verification. Rockstar Games & >>>>> Arch Linux 32 restrict access in Brazil.
My take: The age of privacy is now effectively over. If you use Linux, >>>>> it will be because you truly believe that it is a superior operating >>>>> system, not because you believe that it will improve your privacy or >>>>> security.
More build-up for the world-wide Electronic Gulag. That's the real reason >>>> corporations are so crazed about this AI bullshit. I hope Iran knocks some >>>> more server farms while they're at it.
I don't believe that Iran will be doing much more damage going forward.
As much as the media wants us to believe that the US and Israel are
failing miserably over there, there is no substance whatsoever to their
claims.
I think you're mistaken here. I've seen the satellite images. There's
basically no radars or working U.S. bases left in the Gulf (or even Jordan). >> And now they're hitting Israel after yet another "decapitation" murder by
the genocidal Zionists. I know the Strait of Hormuz is still closed (to all >> but the Chinese, it seems). Meanwhile the U.S. is keeping their battle ships >> far out of range, while Trump (who claims the Iranians are decimated) is
whining that no one in NATO will help. (He wants their ships to get blown
up.) So which is it? Are the Iranians defeated, or does Trump need the help >> of the NATO countries (the ones he keeps leveling tariffs on and insulting). >> If the war is over, why does NATO matter to him? It doesn't add up.
As I explained to my wife, NATO allies stepping to defend the Strait is evidence that there is still a point to there even being a NATO. If the United States is to be tasked with defending the European "allies," they should at least be willing to help Americans in this one task. If they
are unwilling to do so, NATO might as well cease to exist.
On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 07:49:12 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
I shouldn't complain though, our
rates are still much lower than most of the country. Most of the power
is generated by damns that were built years ago.
Where I live goes back to the Rural Electrification Act in the '30s so I'm in a co-op that contracts with the BPA. The city was Montana Power. MPC
sold all their power assets to out of state corporations and went into the telecommunications business just in time for the dot-com crash. They went Chapter 11, and the customers took it in the shorts.
The governor at the time, Racicot, was big on deregulation. What that achieved was de-industrialization as the aluminum foundries and pulp mill couldn't afford the deregulated power. He went on to become a lobbyist.
When he endorsed Biden over Trump the state Republicans told him to FOAD.
chrisv wrote:
CrudeSausage wrote:
Brazil's Age Verification Law is in Effect, Ubuntu Being Monitored for >>>Compliance
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/brazils-age-verification-law-is-in>
Brazil monitoring 37 companies, including Canonical, Valve, & more. >>>System76 bans users for asking about age verification. Rockstar Games & >>>Arch Linux 32 restrict access in Brazil.
My take: The age of privacy is now effectively over. If you use Linux, >>>it will be because you truly believe that it is a superior operating >>>system, not because you believe that it will improve your privacy or >>>security.
How can they possibly prevent Canonical, or anyone else, from offering
downloads without this garbage? They can't.
I hope you're right, but I wouldn't be sure about it.
On 2026-03-18, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
CrudeSausage wrote:
Brazil's Age Verification Law is in Effect, Ubuntu Being Monitored for
Compliance
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/brazils-age-verification-law-is-in>
Brazil monitoring 37 companies, including Canonical, Valve, & more.
System76 bans users for asking about age verification. Rockstar Games &
Arch Linux 32 restrict access in Brazil.
My take: The age of privacy is now effectively over. If you use Linux,
it will be because you truly believe that it is a superior operating
system, not because you believe that it will improve your privacy or
security.
How can they possibly prevent Canonical, or anyone else, from offering
downloads without this garbage? They can't.
I hope you're right, but I wouldn't be sure about it.
On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-18 3:41 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-17 6:10 p.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-17, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Brazil's Age Verification Law is in Effect, Ubuntu Being Monitored for >>>>>> Compliance
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/brazils-age-verification-law-is-in> >>>>>>
Brazil monitoring 37 companies, including Canonical, Valve, & more. >>>>>> System76 bans users for asking about age verification. Rockstar Games & >>>>>> Arch Linux 32 restrict access in Brazil.
My take: The age of privacy is now effectively over. If you use Linux, >>>>>> it will be because you truly believe that it is a superior operating >>>>>> system, not because you believe that it will improve your privacy or >>>>>> security.
More build-up for the world-wide Electronic Gulag. That's the real reason >>>>> corporations are so crazed about this AI bullshit. I hope Iran knocks some
more server farms while they're at it.
I don't believe that Iran will be doing much more damage going forward. >>>> As much as the media wants us to believe that the US and Israel are
failing miserably over there, there is no substance whatsoever to their >>>> claims.
I think you're mistaken here. I've seen the satellite images. There's
basically no radars or working U.S. bases left in the Gulf (or even Jordan).
And now they're hitting Israel after yet another "decapitation" murder by >>> the genocidal Zionists. I know the Strait of Hormuz is still closed (to all >>> but the Chinese, it seems). Meanwhile the U.S. is keeping their battle ships
far out of range, while Trump (who claims the Iranians are decimated) is >>> whining that no one in NATO will help. (He wants their ships to get blown >>> up.) So which is it? Are the Iranians defeated, or does Trump need the help >>> of the NATO countries (the ones he keeps leveling tariffs on and insulting).
If the war is over, why does NATO matter to him? It doesn't add up.
As I explained to my wife, NATO allies stepping to defend the Strait is
evidence that there is still a point to there even being a NATO. If the
United States is to be tasked with defending the European "allies," they
should at least be willing to help Americans in this one task. If they
are unwilling to do so, NATO might as well cease to exist.
NATO should have been disbanded 35 years ago when the Soviet Union
collapsed.
Iran is hitting more and more of the U.S. owned oil infrastructure in the Gulf. Apparently they hit the Saudi Arabia's Red Sea terminal for their pipeline that was supposed to avoid the trouble in the Persian Gulf. (I pretty much saw that coming.) Gas is now up to $4.09 a gallon where I live (was at $2.69 a gallon when Trump and NutYahoo started this war). This is what you get when you have warmongering moron and a genocidal NutYahoo butt kisser for a president.
Iran has (apparently) hit Saudi Arabia's "alternate route" — an oil pipeline
to the Red Sea at Yanbu. I pretty much figured that would happen. I guess maybe the U.S. and Israel shouldn't have started bombing Iran's oil facilities. What comes around goes around.
Iran is also threatening to cut the underwater Internet cables in the Gulf and the Red Sea. Which would disrupt 17% of worldwide Internet traffic (the Gulf States have huge AI server farms on their territory).
Iran is threatening to cut off underwater Internet cables to the Gulf
states if they continue to host American military forces there.
Cables passing through the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea transmit 17%
of the world's traffic, including to artificial intelligence centers in
the UAE and Saudi Arabia, which could potentially lead to months-long
disruptions in operations.
This war could very well destroy the "West's" economy. Trump was warned
about this but the moron "knew better."
RonB wrote:
chrisv wrote:
CrudeSausage wrote:
Brazil's Age Verification Law is in Effect, Ubuntu Being Monitored for >>>> Compliance
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/brazils-age-verification-law-is-in>
Brazil monitoring 37 companies, including Canonical, Valve, & more.
System76 bans users for asking about age verification. Rockstar Games & >>>> Arch Linux 32 restrict access in Brazil.
My take: The age of privacy is now effectively over. If you use Linux, >>>> it will be because you truly believe that it is a superior operating
system, not because you believe that it will improve your privacy or
security.
How can they possibly prevent Canonical, or anyone else, from offering
downloads without this garbage? They can't.
I hope you're right, but I wouldn't be sure about it.
Worst case, someone will branch it and offer it without the garbage.
Sorry, tyrants, but you can't legislate spyware into Free software.
chrisv wrote:
Worst case, someone will branch it and offer it without the garbage.
Sorry, tyrants, but you can't legislate spyware into Free software.
Well, we also thought they couldn't kill Usenet yet here we are, on a >shrinking forum...
CrudeSausage wrote:
chrisv wrote:
Worst case, someone will branch it and offer it without the garbage.
Sorry, tyrants, but you can't legislate spyware into Free software.
Well, we also thought they couldn't kill Usenet yet here we are, on a
shrinking forum...
No one is killing Usenet. Its decline is organic and not forced.
RonB wrote:
chrisv wrote:
CrudeSausage wrote:
Brazil's Age Verification Law is in Effect, Ubuntu Being Monitored for >>>>Compliance
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/brazils-age-verification-law-is-in>
Brazil monitoring 37 companies, including Canonical, Valve, & more. >>>>System76 bans users for asking about age verification. Rockstar Games & >>>>Arch Linux 32 restrict access in Brazil.
My take: The age of privacy is now effectively over. If you use Linux, >>>>it will be because you truly believe that it is a superior operating >>>>system, not because you believe that it will improve your privacy or >>>>security.
How can they possibly prevent Canonical, or anyone else, from offering
downloads without this garbage? They can't.
I hope you're right, but I wouldn't be sure about it.
Worst case, someone will branch it and offer it without the garbage.
Sorry, tyrants, but you can't legislate spyware into Free software.
On 2026-03-19 6:40 p.m., chrisv wrote:
CrudeSausage wrote:
chrisv wrote:
Worst case, someone will branch it and offer it without the garbage.
Sorry, tyrants, but you can't legislate spyware into Free software.
Well, we also thought they couldn't kill Usenet yet here we are, on a
shrinking forum...
No one is killing Usenet. Its decline is organic and not forced.
Well, subscribing to an ISP usually resulted in you getting the settings
for their Usenet server should you care to join. Since a Congressman complained at the turn of the century, ISPs don't even have Usenet
servers anymore.
On 2026-03-19 4:32 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-18 3:41 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-17 6:10 p.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-17, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Brazil's Age Verification Law is in Effect, Ubuntu Being Monitored for >>>>>>> Compliance
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/brazils-age-verification-law-is-in> >>>>>>>
Brazil monitoring 37 companies, including Canonical, Valve, & more. >>>>>>> System76 bans users for asking about age verification. Rockstar Games & >>>>>>> Arch Linux 32 restrict access in Brazil.
My take: The age of privacy is now effectively over. If you use Linux, >>>>>>> it will be because you truly believe that it is a superior operating >>>>>>> system, not because you believe that it will improve your privacy or >>>>>>> security.
More build-up for the world-wide Electronic Gulag. That's the real reason
corporations are so crazed about this AI bullshit. I hope Iran knocks some
more server farms while they're at it.
I don't believe that Iran will be doing much more damage going forward. >>>>> As much as the media wants us to believe that the US and Israel are
failing miserably over there, there is no substance whatsoever to their >>>>> claims.
I think you're mistaken here. I've seen the satellite images. There's
basically no radars or working U.S. bases left in the Gulf (or even Jordan).
And now they're hitting Israel after yet another "decapitation" murder by >>>> the genocidal Zionists. I know the Strait of Hormuz is still closed (to all
but the Chinese, it seems). Meanwhile the U.S. is keeping their battle ships
far out of range, while Trump (who claims the Iranians are decimated) is >>>> whining that no one in NATO will help. (He wants their ships to get blown >>>> up.) So which is it? Are the Iranians defeated, or does Trump need the help
of the NATO countries (the ones he keeps leveling tariffs on and insulting).
If the war is over, why does NATO matter to him? It doesn't add up.
As I explained to my wife, NATO allies stepping to defend the Strait is
evidence that there is still a point to there even being a NATO. If the
United States is to be tasked with defending the European "allies," they >>> should at least be willing to help Americans in this one task. If they
are unwilling to do so, NATO might as well cease to exist.
NATO should have been disbanded 35 years ago when the Soviet Union
collapsed.
I could understand that they wanted it to stick around for a little bit, just to see if the Communist garbage was going to re-emerge. However, considering how little the "allies" actually invested in it, the
American governments should have been in a hurry to disband it.
Iran is hitting more and more of the U.S. owned oil infrastructure in the
Gulf. Apparently they hit the Saudi Arabia's Red Sea terminal for their
pipeline that was supposed to avoid the trouble in the Persian Gulf. (I
pretty much saw that coming.) Gas is now up to $4.09 a gallon where I live >> (was at $2.69 a gallon when Trump and NutYahoo started this war). This is
what you get when you have warmongering moron and a genocidal NutYahoo butt >> kisser for a president.
Iran has (apparently) hit Saudi Arabia's "alternate route" — an oil pipeline
to the Red Sea at Yanbu. I pretty much figured that would happen. I guess
maybe the U.S. and Israel shouldn't have started bombing Iran's oil
facilities. What comes around goes around.
Iran is also threatening to cut the underwater Internet cables in the Gulf >> and the Red Sea. Which would disrupt 17% of worldwide Internet traffic (the >> Gulf States have huge AI server farms on their territory).
Iran is threatening to cut off underwater Internet cables to the Gulf
states if they continue to host American military forces there.
Cables passing through the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea transmit 17% >> of the world's traffic, including to artificial intelligence centers in >> the UAE and Saudi Arabia, which could potentially lead to months-long
disruptions in operations.
This war could very well destroy the "West's" economy. Trump was warned
about this but the moron "knew better."
Honestly, what this war _should_ do is encourage North Americans to
demand that the oil supplies of our continent actually deliver the
product. There is no excuse for Canada capping Alberta in the knees and preventing them from transporting their oil to the East coast, and there
is no reason for anyone to buy from the Middle East when there is oil
near us in Venezuela either. Either way, I know that Iran was indeed a serious threat and since I know that Islam and their terror is a genuine problem in the West, I am happy to see the Americans and Israel
decimating their sponsors. I can spend another few bucks on gas if I
know that the muhammedans and their awful religion loses influence.
chrisv wrote:
CrudeSausage wrote:
chrisv wrote:
Worst case, someone will branch it and offer it without the garbage.
Sorry, tyrants, but you can't legislate spyware into Free software.
Well, we also thought they couldn't kill Usenet yet here we are, on a
shrinking forum...
No one is killing Usenet. Its decline is organic and not forced.
Well, subscribing to an ISP usually resulted in you getting the settings
for their Usenet server should you care to join. Since a Congressman >complained at the turn of the century, ISPs don't even have Usenet
servers anymore.
On 2026-03-19, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-19 4:32 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-18 3:41 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-17 6:10 p.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-17, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Brazil's Age Verification Law is in Effect, Ubuntu Being Monitored for >>>>>>>> Compliance
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/brazils-age-verification-law-is-in> >>>>>>>>
Brazil monitoring 37 companies, including Canonical, Valve, & more. >>>>>>>> System76 bans users for asking about age verification. Rockstar Games &
Arch Linux 32 restrict access in Brazil.
My take: The age of privacy is now effectively over. If you use Linux, >>>>>>>> it will be because you truly believe that it is a superior operating >>>>>>>> system, not because you believe that it will improve your privacy or >>>>>>>> security.
More build-up for the world-wide Electronic Gulag. That's the real reason
corporations are so crazed about this AI bullshit. I hope Iran knocks some
more server farms while they're at it.
I don't believe that Iran will be doing much more damage going forward. >>>>>> As much as the media wants us to believe that the US and Israel are >>>>>> failing miserably over there, there is no substance whatsoever to their >>>>>> claims.
I think you're mistaken here. I've seen the satellite images. There's >>>>> basically no radars or working U.S. bases left in the Gulf (or even Jordan).
And now they're hitting Israel after yet another "decapitation" murder by >>>>> the genocidal Zionists. I know the Strait of Hormuz is still closed (to all
but the Chinese, it seems). Meanwhile the U.S. is keeping their battle ships
far out of range, while Trump (who claims the Iranians are decimated) is >>>>> whining that no one in NATO will help. (He wants their ships to get blown >>>>> up.) So which is it? Are the Iranians defeated, or does Trump need the help
of the NATO countries (the ones he keeps leveling tariffs on and insulting).
If the war is over, why does NATO matter to him? It doesn't add up.
As I explained to my wife, NATO allies stepping to defend the Strait is >>>> evidence that there is still a point to there even being a NATO. If the >>>> United States is to be tasked with defending the European "allies," they >>>> should at least be willing to help Americans in this one task. If they >>>> are unwilling to do so, NATO might as well cease to exist.
NATO should have been disbanded 35 years ago when the Soviet Union
collapsed.
I could understand that they wanted it to stick around for a little bit,
just to see if the Communist garbage was going to re-emerge. However,
considering how little the "allies" actually invested in it, the
American governments should have been in a hurry to disband it.
Iran is hitting more and more of the U.S. owned oil infrastructure in the >>> Gulf. Apparently they hit the Saudi Arabia's Red Sea terminal for their
pipeline that was supposed to avoid the trouble in the Persian Gulf. (I
pretty much saw that coming.) Gas is now up to $4.09 a gallon where I live >>> (was at $2.69 a gallon when Trump and NutYahoo started this war). This is >>> what you get when you have warmongering moron and a genocidal NutYahoo butt >>> kisser for a president.
Iran has (apparently) hit Saudi Arabia's "alternate route" — an oil pipeline
to the Red Sea at Yanbu. I pretty much figured that would happen. I guess >>> maybe the U.S. and Israel shouldn't have started bombing Iran's oil
facilities. What comes around goes around.
Iran is also threatening to cut the underwater Internet cables in the Gulf >>> and the Red Sea. Which would disrupt 17% of worldwide Internet traffic (the >>> Gulf States have huge AI server farms on their territory).
Iran is threatening to cut off underwater Internet cables to the Gulf >>> states if they continue to host American military forces there.
Cables passing through the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea transmit 17%
of the world's traffic, including to artificial intelligence centers in >>> the UAE and Saudi Arabia, which could potentially lead to months-long >>> disruptions in operations.
This war could very well destroy the "West's" economy. Trump was warned
about this but the moron "knew better."
Honestly, what this war _should_ do is encourage North Americans to
demand that the oil supplies of our continent actually deliver the
product. There is no excuse for Canada capping Alberta in the knees and
preventing them from transporting their oil to the East coast, and there
is no reason for anyone to buy from the Middle East when there is oil
near us in Venezuela either. Either way, I know that Iran was indeed a
serious threat and since I know that Islam and their terror is a genuine
problem in the West, I am happy to see the Americans and Israel
decimating their sponsors. I can spend another few bucks on gas if I
know that the muhammedans and their awful religion loses influence.
In what way, specifically, was Iran a "serious threat" to the West? The only thing it was a serious threat to was genocidal NutYahoo's "Greater Israel." Israel and the United States are the ones who started this war (and the one in June, 2025) not Iran.
On 2026-03-19, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-19 6:40 p.m., chrisv wrote:
CrudeSausage wrote:
chrisv wrote:
Worst case, someone will branch it and offer it without the garbage. >>>>>
Sorry, tyrants, but you can't legislate spyware into Free software.
Well, we also thought they couldn't kill Usenet yet here we are, on a
shrinking forum...
No one is killing Usenet. Its decline is organic and not forced.
Well, subscribing to an ISP usually resulted in you getting the settings
for their Usenet server should you care to join. Since a Congressman
complained at the turn of the century, ISPs don't even have Usenet
servers anymore.
That's true, but that was basically ended about twenty years ago.
On 2026-03-19, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-19 6:40 p.m., chrisv wrote:
CrudeSausage wrote:
chrisv wrote:
Worst case, someone will branch it and offer it without the garbage. >>>>>
Sorry, tyrants, but you can't legislate spyware into Free software.
Well, we also thought they couldn't kill Usenet yet here we are, on a
shrinking forum...
No one is killing Usenet. Its decline is organic and not forced.
Well, subscribing to an ISP usually resulted in you getting the settings
for their Usenet server should you care to join. Since a Congressman
complained at the turn of the century, ISPs don't even have Usenet
servers anymore.
That's true, but that was basically ended about twenty years ago.
On 2026-03-19, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-19 4:32 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-18 3:41 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-17 6:10 p.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-17, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Brazil's Age Verification Law is in Effect, Ubuntu Being Monitored for >>>>>>>> Compliance
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/brazils-age-verification-law-is-in> >>>>>>>>
Brazil monitoring 37 companies, including Canonical, Valve, & more. >>>>>>>> System76 bans users for asking about age verification. Rockstar Games &
Arch Linux 32 restrict access in Brazil.
My take: The age of privacy is now effectively over. If you use Linux, >>>>>>>> it will be because you truly believe that it is a superior operating >>>>>>>> system, not because you believe that it will improve your privacy or >>>>>>>> security.
More build-up for the world-wide Electronic Gulag. That's the real reason
corporations are so crazed about this AI bullshit. I hope Iran knocks some
more server farms while they're at it.
I don't believe that Iran will be doing much more damage going forward. >>>>>> As much as the media wants us to believe that the US and Israel are >>>>>> failing miserably over there, there is no substance whatsoever to their >>>>>> claims.
I think you're mistaken here. I've seen the satellite images. There's >>>>> basically no radars or working U.S. bases left in the Gulf (or even Jordan).
And now they're hitting Israel after yet another "decapitation" murder by >>>>> the genocidal Zionists. I know the Strait of Hormuz is still closed (to all
but the Chinese, it seems). Meanwhile the U.S. is keeping their battle ships
far out of range, while Trump (who claims the Iranians are decimated) is >>>>> whining that no one in NATO will help. (He wants their ships to get blown >>>>> up.) So which is it? Are the Iranians defeated, or does Trump need the help
of the NATO countries (the ones he keeps leveling tariffs on and insulting).
If the war is over, why does NATO matter to him? It doesn't add up.
As I explained to my wife, NATO allies stepping to defend the Strait is >>>> evidence that there is still a point to there even being a NATO. If the >>>> United States is to be tasked with defending the European "allies," they >>>> should at least be willing to help Americans in this one task. If they >>>> are unwilling to do so, NATO might as well cease to exist.
NATO should have been disbanded 35 years ago when the Soviet Union
collapsed.
I could understand that they wanted it to stick around for a little bit,
just to see if the Communist garbage was going to re-emerge. However,
considering how little the "allies" actually invested in it, the
American governments should have been in a hurry to disband it.
Iran is hitting more and more of the U.S. owned oil infrastructure in the >>> Gulf. Apparently they hit the Saudi Arabia's Red Sea terminal for their
pipeline that was supposed to avoid the trouble in the Persian Gulf. (I
pretty much saw that coming.) Gas is now up to $4.09 a gallon where I live >>> (was at $2.69 a gallon when Trump and NutYahoo started this war). This is >>> what you get when you have warmongering moron and a genocidal NutYahoo butt >>> kisser for a president.
Iran has (apparently) hit Saudi Arabia's "alternate route" — an oil pipeline
to the Red Sea at Yanbu. I pretty much figured that would happen. I guess >>> maybe the U.S. and Israel shouldn't have started bombing Iran's oil
facilities. What comes around goes around.
Iran is also threatening to cut the underwater Internet cables in the Gulf >>> and the Red Sea. Which would disrupt 17% of worldwide Internet traffic (the >>> Gulf States have huge AI server farms on their territory).
Iran is threatening to cut off underwater Internet cables to the Gulf >>> states if they continue to host American military forces there.
Cables passing through the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea transmit 17%
of the world's traffic, including to artificial intelligence centers in
the UAE and Saudi Arabia, which could potentially lead to months-long >>> disruptions in operations.
This war could very well destroy the "West's" economy. Trump was warned
about this but the moron "knew better."
Honestly, what this war _should_ do is encourage North Americans to
demand that the oil supplies of our continent actually deliver the
product. There is no excuse for Canada capping Alberta in the knees and
preventing them from transporting their oil to the East coast, and there
is no reason for anyone to buy from the Middle East when there is oil
near us in Venezuela either. Either way, I know that Iran was indeed a
serious threat and since I know that Islam and their terror is a genuine
problem in the West, I am happy to see the Americans and Israel
decimating their sponsors. I can spend another few bucks on gas if I
know that the muhammedans and their awful religion loses influence.
In what way, specifically, was Iran a "serious threat" to the West?
The only
thing it was a serious threat to was genocidal NutYahoo's "Greater Israel." Israel and the United States are the ones who started this war (and the one in June, 2025) not Iran.
CrudeSausage wrote:
chrisv wrote:
CrudeSausage wrote:
chrisv wrote:
Worst case, someone will branch it and offer it without the garbage. >>>>>
Sorry, tyrants, but you can't legislate spyware into Free software.
Well, we also thought they couldn't kill Usenet yet here we are, on a
shrinking forum...
No one is killing Usenet. Its decline is organic and not forced.
Well, subscribing to an ISP usually resulted in you getting the settings
for their Usenet server should you care to join. Since a Congressman
complained at the turn of the century, ISPs don't even have Usenet
servers anymore.
You have a cite about this "congressman who complained" causing ISP's
to drop Usenet?
I didn't save bookmarks back then in the hope that I may use them for conversations twenty-five years later. However, it might be
misremembering as to whether a Congressman actually complained or
whether a colleague of mine told me that they did. Either way, as I do a search now, it appears that a lot of companies retired their Usenet
server not because of laws, but because it cost them too much in
bandwidth and storage, especially with all the illegal content being
shared.
On Fri, 20 Mar 2026 09:03:28 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
I didn't save bookmarks back then in the hope that I may use them for
conversations twenty-five years later. However, it might be
misremembering as to whether a Congressman actually complained or
whether a colleague of mine told me that they did. Either way, as I do a
search now, it appears that a lot of companies retired their Usenet
server not because of laws, but because it cost them too much in
bandwidth and storage, especially with all the illegal content being
shared.
That was the case with my ISP. It takes a lot of terabytes to host a
usenet node and the perceived value wasn't there as people moved to the
newer online communities. There isn't a good way to monetize usenet. When individual.net went from free to 10 Euros a year it seemed more like a
token charge. The site doesn't do binaries which helps. I'm not sure what I'll do when they drop it next year.
On Fri, 20 Mar 2026 09:03:28 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
I didn't save bookmarks back then in the hope that I may use them for
conversations twenty-five years later. However, it might be
misremembering as to whether a Congressman actually complained or
whether a colleague of mine told me that they did. Either way, as I do a
search now, it appears that a lot of companies retired their Usenet
server not because of laws, but because it cost them too much in
bandwidth and storage, especially with all the illegal content being
shared.
That was the case with my ISP. It takes a lot of terabytes to host a
usenet node and the perceived value wasn't there as people moved to the
newer online communities. There isn't a good way to monetize usenet. When individual.net went from free to 10 Euros a year it seemed more like a
token charge. The site doesn't do binaries which helps. I'm not sure what I'll do when they drop it next year.
On Fri, 20 Mar 2026 09:03:28 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
I didn't save bookmarks back then in the hope that I may use them for
conversations twenty-five years later. However, it might be
misremembering as to whether a Congressman actually complained or
whether a colleague of mine told me that they did. Either way, as I do a
search now, it appears that a lot of companies retired their Usenet
server not because of laws, but because it cost them too much in
bandwidth and storage, especially with all the illegal content being
shared.
That was the case with my ISP. It takes a lot of terabytes to host a
usenet node and the perceived value wasn't there as people moved to the newer online communities. There isn't a good way to monetize usenet. When individual.net went from free to 10 Euros a year it seemed more like a
token charge. The site doesn't do binaries which helps. I'm not sure what I'll do when they drop it next year.
On 2026-03-20 1:04 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-19, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-19 4:32 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-18 3:41 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:As I explained to my wife, NATO allies stepping to defend the Strait is >>>>> evidence that there is still a point to there even being a NATO. If the >>>>> United States is to be tasked with defending the European "allies," they >>>>> should at least be willing to help Americans in this one task. If they >>>>> are unwilling to do so, NATO might as well cease to exist.
On 2026-03-17 6:10 p.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-17, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Brazil's Age Verification Law is in Effect, Ubuntu Being Monitored for
Compliance
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/brazils-age-verification-law-is-in> >>>>>>>>>
Brazil monitoring 37 companies, including Canonical, Valve, & more. >>>>>>>>> System76 bans users for asking about age verification. Rockstar Games &
Arch Linux 32 restrict access in Brazil.
My take: The age of privacy is now effectively over. If you use Linux,
it will be because you truly believe that it is a superior operating >>>>>>>>> system, not because you believe that it will improve your privacy or >>>>>>>>> security.
More build-up for the world-wide Electronic Gulag. That's the real reason
corporations are so crazed about this AI bullshit. I hope Iran knocks some
more server farms while they're at it.
I don't believe that Iran will be doing much more damage going forward. >>>>>>> As much as the media wants us to believe that the US and Israel are >>>>>>> failing miserably over there, there is no substance whatsoever to their >>>>>>> claims.
I think you're mistaken here. I've seen the satellite images. There's >>>>>> basically no radars or working U.S. bases left in the Gulf (or even Jordan).
And now they're hitting Israel after yet another "decapitation" murder by
the genocidal Zionists. I know the Strait of Hormuz is still closed (to all
but the Chinese, it seems). Meanwhile the U.S. is keeping their battle ships
far out of range, while Trump (who claims the Iranians are decimated) is >>>>>> whining that no one in NATO will help. (He wants their ships to get blown
up.) So which is it? Are the Iranians defeated, or does Trump need the help
of the NATO countries (the ones he keeps leveling tariffs on and insulting).
If the war is over, why does NATO matter to him? It doesn't add up. >>>>>
NATO should have been disbanded 35 years ago when the Soviet Union
collapsed.
I could understand that they wanted it to stick around for a little bit, >>> just to see if the Communist garbage was going to re-emerge. However,
considering how little the "allies" actually invested in it, the
American governments should have been in a hurry to disband it.
Iran is hitting more and more of the U.S. owned oil infrastructure in the >>>> Gulf. Apparently they hit the Saudi Arabia's Red Sea terminal for their >>>> pipeline that was supposed to avoid the trouble in the Persian Gulf. (I >>>> pretty much saw that coming.) Gas is now up to $4.09 a gallon where I live >>>> (was at $2.69 a gallon when Trump and NutYahoo started this war). This is >>>> what you get when you have warmongering moron and a genocidal NutYahoo butt
kisser for a president.
Iran has (apparently) hit Saudi Arabia's "alternate route" — an oil pipeline
to the Red Sea at Yanbu. I pretty much figured that would happen. I guess >>>> maybe the U.S. and Israel shouldn't have started bombing Iran's oil
facilities. What comes around goes around.
Iran is also threatening to cut the underwater Internet cables in the Gulf >>>> and the Red Sea. Which would disrupt 17% of worldwide Internet traffic (the
Gulf States have huge AI server farms on their territory).
Iran is threatening to cut off underwater Internet cables to the Gulf >>>> states if they continue to host American military forces there.
Cables passing through the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea transmit 17%
of the world's traffic, including to artificial intelligence centers in
the UAE and Saudi Arabia, which could potentially lead to months-long >>>> disruptions in operations.
This war could very well destroy the "West's" economy. Trump was warned >>>> about this but the moron "knew better."
Honestly, what this war _should_ do is encourage North Americans to
demand that the oil supplies of our continent actually deliver the
product. There is no excuse for Canada capping Alberta in the knees and
preventing them from transporting their oil to the East coast, and there >>> is no reason for anyone to buy from the Middle East when there is oil
near us in Venezuela either. Either way, I know that Iran was indeed a
serious threat and since I know that Islam and their terror is a genuine >>> problem in the West, I am happy to see the Americans and Israel
decimating their sponsors. I can spend another few bucks on gas if I
know that the muhammedans and their awful religion loses influence.
In what way, specifically, was Iran a "serious threat" to the West?
They sponsored the terrorist groups in Gaza and Lebanon in particular
which enforced Islamic values in the country and caused anyone with
common sense to escape the country. This wouldn't be a significant issue
if Islamists didn't integrate the ranks of the people with common sense
to flood the West with like-minded barbarians who want to take over our society and enact Sharia law. Similarly, the West was still in a
position that if Iran threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz, it could retaliate and put the country in its place. Had they been allowed to continue stockpiling weapons and working towards the nukes as they
provably were (they had enriched the uranium to 60%
<https://armscontrolcenter.org/irans-stockpile-of-highly-enriched-uranium-worth-bargaining-for/>),
they would have eventually been in a position where they could do
whatever they wish around there and the West would have had no way of retaliating.
I will say this once again: America and Israel are not the bad guys here.
The only
thing it was a serious threat to was genocidal NutYahoo's "Greater Israel." >> Israel and the United States are the ones who started this war (and the one >> in June, 2025) not Iran.
I applaud them for starting the war before it would have turned into something much worse for us to deal with. The same way that Islam is a poison, Iran is a snake.
On 2026-03-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-20 1:04 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-19, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-19 4:32 a.m., RonB wrote:
Iran is hitting more and more of the U.S. owned oil infrastructure in the >>>>> Gulf. Apparently they hit the Saudi Arabia's Red Sea terminal for their >>>>> pipeline that was supposed to avoid the trouble in the Persian Gulf. (I >>>>> pretty much saw that coming.) Gas is now up to $4.09 a gallon where I live
(was at $2.69 a gallon when Trump and NutYahoo started this war). This is >>>>> what you get when you have warmongering moron and a genocidal NutYahoo butt
kisser for a president.
Iran has (apparently) hit Saudi Arabia's "alternate route" — an oil pipeline
to the Red Sea at Yanbu. I pretty much figured that would happen. I guess >>>>> maybe the U.S. and Israel shouldn't have started bombing Iran's oil
facilities. What comes around goes around.
Iran is also threatening to cut the underwater Internet cables in the Gulf
and the Red Sea. Which would disrupt 17% of worldwide Internet traffic (the
Gulf States have huge AI server farms on their territory).
Iran is threatening to cut off underwater Internet cables to the Gulf
states if they continue to host American military forces there. >>>>>
Cables passing through the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea transmit 17%
of the world's traffic, including to artificial intelligence centers in
the UAE and Saudi Arabia, which could potentially lead to months-long
disruptions in operations.
This war could very well destroy the "West's" economy. Trump was warned >>>>> about this but the moron "knew better."
Honestly, what this war _should_ do is encourage North Americans to
demand that the oil supplies of our continent actually deliver the
product. There is no excuse for Canada capping Alberta in the knees and >>>> preventing them from transporting their oil to the East coast, and there >>>> is no reason for anyone to buy from the Middle East when there is oil
near us in Venezuela either. Either way, I know that Iran was indeed a >>>> serious threat and since I know that Islam and their terror is a genuine >>>> problem in the West, I am happy to see the Americans and Israel
decimating their sponsors. I can spend another few bucks on gas if I
know that the muhammedans and their awful religion loses influence.
In what way, specifically, was Iran a "serious threat" to the West?
They sponsored the terrorist groups in Gaza and Lebanon in particular
which enforced Islamic values in the country and caused anyone with
common sense to escape the country. This wouldn't be a significant issue
if Islamists didn't integrate the ranks of the people with common sense
to flood the West with like-minded barbarians who want to take over our
society and enact Sharia law. Similarly, the West was still in a
position that if Iran threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz, it could
retaliate and put the country in its place. Had they been allowed to
continue stockpiling weapons and working towards the nukes as they
provably were (they had enriched the uranium to 60%
<https://armscontrolcenter.org/irans-stockpile-of-highly-enriched-uranium-worth-bargaining-for/>),
they would have eventually been in a position where they could do
whatever they wish around there and the West would have had no way of
retaliating.
Gaza and Lebanon are not the "West." We sponsor the worst terrorist group in the world, the genocidal Israelis. Who's land is being taken on the West Bank, Gaza and in Syria and Lebanon? It's definitely not Israeli land that's being stolen.
You talk about Sharia law, but totally ignore the Jews referring to non-Jews as "goyim," (cattle). Their Talmud teaches that land owned by the goyim can be taken at any time. It's considered "unoccupied land" because no "people" live there. The Jews teach that they are "exceptional" the "chosen" people. Really the *only* people. All others are animals. That's why they have no problem murdering women and children when they "mow the grass" in Gaza. NutYahoo refers to the Gazans as "Amaleks" the tribe God told true
(Biblical) Israel to wipe out — every man, woman and child. They apply this bullshit to the Gazans. And AIPAC (Rothschilds) in the U.S. gives cover for these genocidal thugs.
So, no, I'm not in favor of Sharia law, but more harm to "West" is done to
us because of the Rothschild control of our countries. And our support for the Israeli genocidal thugs means our government(s) is (are) also genocidal.
As for immigration to Western countries, blame the U.S. and Israel for destroying Middle East governments and sewing chaos to weaken their opponents. Also blame the Western countries for allowing this immigration because the Rothschilds (via Soros and his displacement actions) want to
wipe out the white race.
I will say this once again: America and Israel are not the bad guys here.
I will say again, Israel is a genocidal thug country and the U.S. is guilty of genocide because our Rothschild controlled government supports genocidal Israel. It's insanity.
The only
thing it was a serious threat to was genocidal NutYahoo's "Greater Israel." >>> Israel and the United States are the ones who started this war (and the one >>> in June, 2025) not Iran.
I applaud them for starting the war before it would have turned into
something much worse for us to deal with. The same way that Islam is a
poison, Iran is a snake.
What was going to to "turn into something much worse?" Sorry, but you're gullible to believe the genocidal NutYahoo and his warmongering moron and butt leach, Trump. NutYahoo dreams of "Greater Israel," and he can only have it after destroying all other countries in the Middle East. And we, in the Rothschild controlled "West," are empowering this genocidal maniac in his drive to steal "the lands of the goyim."
Don't be gullible about Israel's motives just because your government is allowing the Muslim (mostly Arab, not Persian) immigrants to run roughshod
in your country. That's the result of another Rothschild (Jewish) pogrom — the planned destruction of the white race.
On 2026-03-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-20 1:04 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-19, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-19 4:32 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-18 3:41 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:As I explained to my wife, NATO allies stepping to defend the Strait is >>>>>> evidence that there is still a point to there even being a NATO. If the >>>>>> United States is to be tasked with defending the European "allies," they >>>>>> should at least be willing to help Americans in this one task. If they >>>>>> are unwilling to do so, NATO might as well cease to exist.
On 2026-03-17 6:10 p.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-17, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Brazil's Age Verification Law is in Effect, Ubuntu Being Monitored for
Compliance
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/brazils-age-verification-law-is-in> >>>>>>>>>>
Brazil monitoring 37 companies, including Canonical, Valve, & more. >>>>>>>>>> System76 bans users for asking about age verification. Rockstar Games &
Arch Linux 32 restrict access in Brazil.
My take: The age of privacy is now effectively over. If you use Linux,
it will be because you truly believe that it is a superior operating >>>>>>>>>> system, not because you believe that it will improve your privacy or >>>>>>>>>> security.
More build-up for the world-wide Electronic Gulag. That's the real reason
corporations are so crazed about this AI bullshit. I hope Iran knocks some
more server farms while they're at it.
I don't believe that Iran will be doing much more damage going forward.
As much as the media wants us to believe that the US and Israel are >>>>>>>> failing miserably over there, there is no substance whatsoever to their
claims.
I think you're mistaken here. I've seen the satellite images. There's >>>>>>> basically no radars or working U.S. bases left in the Gulf (or even Jordan).
And now they're hitting Israel after yet another "decapitation" murder by
the genocidal Zionists. I know the Strait of Hormuz is still closed (to all
but the Chinese, it seems). Meanwhile the U.S. is keeping their battle ships
far out of range, while Trump (who claims the Iranians are decimated) is
whining that no one in NATO will help. (He wants their ships to get blown
up.) So which is it? Are the Iranians defeated, or does Trump need the help
of the NATO countries (the ones he keeps leveling tariffs on and insulting).
If the war is over, why does NATO matter to him? It doesn't add up. >>>>>>
NATO should have been disbanded 35 years ago when the Soviet Union
collapsed.
I could understand that they wanted it to stick around for a little bit, >>>> just to see if the Communist garbage was going to re-emerge. However,
considering how little the "allies" actually invested in it, the
American governments should have been in a hurry to disband it.
Iran is hitting more and more of the U.S. owned oil infrastructure in the >>>>> Gulf. Apparently they hit the Saudi Arabia's Red Sea terminal for their >>>>> pipeline that was supposed to avoid the trouble in the Persian Gulf. (I >>>>> pretty much saw that coming.) Gas is now up to $4.09 a gallon where I live
(was at $2.69 a gallon when Trump and NutYahoo started this war). This is >>>>> what you get when you have warmongering moron and a genocidal NutYahoo butt
kisser for a president.
Iran has (apparently) hit Saudi Arabia's "alternate route" — an oil pipeline
to the Red Sea at Yanbu. I pretty much figured that would happen. I guess >>>>> maybe the U.S. and Israel shouldn't have started bombing Iran's oil
facilities. What comes around goes around.
Iran is also threatening to cut the underwater Internet cables in the Gulf
and the Red Sea. Which would disrupt 17% of worldwide Internet traffic (the
Gulf States have huge AI server farms on their territory).
Iran is threatening to cut off underwater Internet cables to the Gulf
states if they continue to host American military forces there. >>>>>
Cables passing through the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea transmit 17%
of the world's traffic, including to artificial intelligence centers in
the UAE and Saudi Arabia, which could potentially lead to months-long
disruptions in operations.
This war could very well destroy the "West's" economy. Trump was warned >>>>> about this but the moron "knew better."
Honestly, what this war _should_ do is encourage North Americans to
demand that the oil supplies of our continent actually deliver the
product. There is no excuse for Canada capping Alberta in the knees and >>>> preventing them from transporting their oil to the East coast, and there >>>> is no reason for anyone to buy from the Middle East when there is oil
near us in Venezuela either. Either way, I know that Iran was indeed a >>>> serious threat and since I know that Islam and their terror is a genuine >>>> problem in the West, I am happy to see the Americans and Israel
decimating their sponsors. I can spend another few bucks on gas if I
know that the muhammedans and their awful religion loses influence.
In what way, specifically, was Iran a "serious threat" to the West?
They sponsored the terrorist groups in Gaza and Lebanon in particular
which enforced Islamic values in the country and caused anyone with
common sense to escape the country. This wouldn't be a significant issue
if Islamists didn't integrate the ranks of the people with common sense
to flood the West with like-minded barbarians who want to take over our
society and enact Sharia law. Similarly, the West was still in a
position that if Iran threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz, it could
retaliate and put the country in its place. Had they been allowed to
continue stockpiling weapons and working towards the nukes as they
provably were (they had enriched the uranium to 60% >><https://armscontrolcenter.org/irans-stockpile-of-highly-enriched-uranium-worth-bargaining-for/>),
they would have eventually been in a position where they could do
whatever they wish around there and the West would have had no way of
retaliating.
Gaza and Lebanon are not the "West." We sponsor the worst terrorist group in the world, the genocidal Israelis. Who's land is being taken on the West Bank, Gaza and in Syria and Lebanon? It's definitely not Israeli land that's being stolen.
You talk about Sharia law, but totally ignore the Jews referring to non-Jews as "goyim," (cattle). Their Talmud teaches that land owned by the goyim can be taken at any time. It's considered "unoccupied land" because no "people" live there. The Jews teach that they are "exceptional" the "chosen" people. Really the *only* people. All others are animals. That's why they have no problem murdering women and children when they "mow the grass" in Gaza. NutYahoo refers to the Gazans as "Amaleks" the tribe God told true (Biblical) Israel to wipe out — every man, woman and child. They apply this
bullshit to the Gazans. And AIPAC (Rothschilds) in the U.S. gives cover for these genocidal thugs.
So, no, I'm not in favor of Sharia law, but more harm to "West" is done to us because of the Rothschild control of our countries. And our support for the Israeli genocidal thugs means our government(s) is (are) also genocidal.
As for immigration to Western countries, blame the U.S. and Israel for destroying Middle East governments and sewing chaos to weaken their opponents. Also blame the Western countries for allowing this immigration because the Rothschilds (via Soros and his displacement actions) want to wipe out the white race.
I will say this once again: America and Israel are not the bad guys here.
I will say again, Israel is a genocidal thug country and the U.S. is guilty of genocide because our Rothschild controlled government supports genocidal Israel. It's insanity.
The only
thing it was a serious threat to was genocidal NutYahoo's "Greater Israel." >>> Israel and the United States are the ones who started this war (and the one >>> in June, 2025) not Iran.
I applaud them for starting the war before it would have turned into
something much worse for us to deal with. The same way that Islam is a
poison, Iran is a snake.
What was going to to "turn into something much worse?" Sorry, but you're gullible to believe the genocidal NutYahoo and his warmongering moron and butt leach, Trump. NutYahoo dreams of "Greater Israel," and he can only have it after destroying all other countries in the Middle East. And we, in the Rothschild controlled "West," are empowering this genocidal maniac in his drive to steal "the lands of the goyim."
Don't be gullible about Israel's motives just because your government is allowing the Muslim (mostly Arab, not Persian) immigrants to run roughshod in your country. That's the result of another Rothschild (Jewish) pogrom — the planned destruction of the white race.
On 2026-03-21, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2026-03-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-20 1:04 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-19, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-19 4:32 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-18 3:41 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:As I explained to my wife, NATO allies stepping to defend the Strait is >>>>>>> evidence that there is still a point to there even being a NATO. If the >>>>>>> United States is to be tasked with defending the European "allies," they
On 2026-03-17 6:10 p.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-17, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Brazil's Age Verification Law is in Effect, Ubuntu Being Monitored for
Compliance
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/brazils-age-verification-law-is-in> >>>>>>>>>>>
Brazil monitoring 37 companies, including Canonical, Valve, & more. >>>>>>>>>>> System76 bans users for asking about age verification. Rockstar Games &
Arch Linux 32 restrict access in Brazil.
My take: The age of privacy is now effectively over. If you use Linux,
it will be because you truly believe that it is a superior operating
system, not because you believe that it will improve your privacy or
security.
More build-up for the world-wide Electronic Gulag. That's the real reason
corporations are so crazed about this AI bullshit. I hope Iran knocks some
more server farms while they're at it.
I don't believe that Iran will be doing much more damage going forward.
As much as the media wants us to believe that the US and Israel are >>>>>>>>> failing miserably over there, there is no substance whatsoever to their
claims.
I think you're mistaken here. I've seen the satellite images. There's >>>>>>>> basically no radars or working U.S. bases left in the Gulf (or even Jordan).
And now they're hitting Israel after yet another "decapitation" murder by
the genocidal Zionists. I know the Strait of Hormuz is still closed (to all
but the Chinese, it seems). Meanwhile the U.S. is keeping their battle ships
far out of range, while Trump (who claims the Iranians are decimated) is
whining that no one in NATO will help. (He wants their ships to get blown
up.) So which is it? Are the Iranians defeated, or does Trump need the help
of the NATO countries (the ones he keeps leveling tariffs on and insulting).
If the war is over, why does NATO matter to him? It doesn't add up. >>>>>>>
should at least be willing to help Americans in this one task. If they >>>>>>> are unwilling to do so, NATO might as well cease to exist.
NATO should have been disbanded 35 years ago when the Soviet Union >>>>>> collapsed.
I could understand that they wanted it to stick around for a little bit, >>>>> just to see if the Communist garbage was going to re-emerge. However, >>>>> considering how little the "allies" actually invested in it, the
American governments should have been in a hurry to disband it.
Iran is hitting more and more of the U.S. owned oil infrastructure in the
Gulf. Apparently they hit the Saudi Arabia's Red Sea terminal for their >>>>>> pipeline that was supposed to avoid the trouble in the Persian Gulf. (I >>>>>> pretty much saw that coming.) Gas is now up to $4.09 a gallon where I live
(was at $2.69 a gallon when Trump and NutYahoo started this war). This is
what you get when you have warmongering moron and a genocidal NutYahoo butt
kisser for a president.
Iran has (apparently) hit Saudi Arabia's "alternate route" — an oil pipeline
to the Red Sea at Yanbu. I pretty much figured that would happen. I guess
maybe the U.S. and Israel shouldn't have started bombing Iran's oil >>>>>> facilities. What comes around goes around.
Iran is also threatening to cut the underwater Internet cables in the Gulf
and the Red Sea. Which would disrupt 17% of worldwide Internet traffic (the
Gulf States have huge AI server farms on their territory).
Iran is threatening to cut off underwater Internet cables to the Gulf
states if they continue to host American military forces there. >>>>>>
Cables passing through the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea transmit 17%
of the world's traffic, including to artificial intelligence centers in
the UAE and Saudi Arabia, which could potentially lead to months-long
disruptions in operations.
This war could very well destroy the "West's" economy. Trump was warned >>>>>> about this but the moron "knew better."
Honestly, what this war _should_ do is encourage North Americans to
demand that the oil supplies of our continent actually deliver the
product. There is no excuse for Canada capping Alberta in the knees and >>>>> preventing them from transporting their oil to the East coast, and there >>>>> is no reason for anyone to buy from the Middle East when there is oil >>>>> near us in Venezuela either. Either way, I know that Iran was indeed a >>>>> serious threat and since I know that Islam and their terror is a genuine >>>>> problem in the West, I am happy to see the Americans and Israel
decimating their sponsors. I can spend another few bucks on gas if I >>>>> know that the muhammedans and their awful religion loses influence.
In what way, specifically, was Iran a "serious threat" to the West?
They sponsored the terrorist groups in Gaza and Lebanon in particular
which enforced Islamic values in the country and caused anyone with
common sense to escape the country. This wouldn't be a significant issue >>> if Islamists didn't integrate the ranks of the people with common sense >>> to flood the West with like-minded barbarians who want to take over our >>> society and enact Sharia law. Similarly, the West was still in a
position that if Iran threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz, it could >>> retaliate and put the country in its place. Had they been allowed to
continue stockpiling weapons and working towards the nukes as they
provably were (they had enriched the uranium to 60% >>><https://armscontrolcenter.org/irans-stockpile-of-highly-enriched-uranium-worth-bargaining-for/>),
they would have eventually been in a position where they could do
whatever they wish around there and the West would have had no way of
retaliating.
Gaza and Lebanon are not the "West." We sponsor the worst terrorist group in
the world, the genocidal Israelis. Who's land is being taken on the West
Bank, Gaza and in Syria and Lebanon? It's definitely not Israeli land that's
being stolen.
Why are you so sure that the land belongs to anyone other than Israel?
Both sides have reasonable arguments as to who owns the land.
What do you base your comments on?
You talk about Sharia law, but totally ignore the Jews referring to non-Jews
as "goyim," (cattle). Their Talmud teaches that land owned by the goyim can >> be taken at any time. It's considered "unoccupied land" because no "people" >> live there. The Jews teach that they are "exceptional" the "chosen" people. >> Really the *only* people. All others are animals. That's why they have no >> problem murdering women and children when they "mow the grass" in Gaza.
NutYahoo refers to the Gazans as "Amaleks" the tribe God told true
(Biblical) Israel to wipe out — every man, woman and child. They apply this
bullshit to the Gazans. And AIPAC (Rothschilds) in the U.S. gives cover for >> these genocidal thugs.
Ok.
So in modern times, where are examples of Jews attacking those unlike them, meaning
Christians etc?
Do you have concrete evidence of Jews invading hostile areas and raping, killing
people, taking hostages and so forth?
Where is the evidence?
It takes about 10 seconds to dig up atrocious crimes of October 7th.
Any equivalent done by Jews?
So, no, I'm not in favor of Sharia law, but more harm to "West" is done to >> us because of the Rothschild control of our countries. And our support for >> the Israeli genocidal thugs means our government(s) is (are) also genocidal.
Yikes!
Let's just say your Rothschild theory is true, they are interested in economic control
and IMHO could care less about Sharia law, Christianity and so forth.
As for immigration to Western countries, blame the U.S. and Israel for
destroying Middle East governments and sewing chaos to weaken their
opponents. Also blame the Western countries for allowing this immigration >> because the Rothschilds (via Soros and his displacement actions) want to
wipe out the white race.
Somewhat true but your origins are suspect.
The elite want to take over the world. They want a 2 class society which means
the ultra wealthy and the rest of this. And additionally they want this to be global.
The entire idea behind globalism is to bring down the powerful countries, like the USA
to the same level as the 3rd world nations so that we are "all the same" and thus
can be controlled and manipulated by the elite.
It's all about money and power.
I will say this once again: America and Israel are not the bad guys here. >>I will say again, Israel is a genocidal thug country and the U.S. is guilty >> of genocide because our Rothschild controlled government supports genocidal >> Israel. It's insanity.
I disagree.
In modern times please list genocidal actions performed by Israel.
Not defense tactics but overt, unprovoked operations.
The only
thing it was a serious threat to was genocidal NutYahoo's "Greater Israel."
Israel and the United States are the ones who started this war (and the one
in June, 2025) not Iran.
I applaud them for starting the war before it would have turned into
something much worse for us to deal with. The same way that Islam is a
poison, Iran is a snake.
What was going to to "turn into something much worse?" Sorry, but you're
gullible to believe the genocidal NutYahoo and his warmongering moron and >> butt leach, Trump. NutYahoo dreams of "Greater Israel," and he can only have
it after destroying all other countries in the Middle East. And we, in the >> Rothschild controlled "West," are empowering this genocidal maniac in his >> drive to steal "the lands of the goyim."
You are way out there with this one Ron.
Both Israel and the Arab countries, under various names, have been battling this since the days of the old testament Bible
IMHO from my limited knowledge, both sides make reasonable arguments.
Don't be gullible about Israel's motives just because your government is
allowing the Muslim (mostly Arab, not Persian) immigrants to run roughshod >> in your country. That's the result of another Rothschild (Jewish) pogrom —
the planned destruction of the white race.
Well of course Israel wants their land to remain theirs as do the Arab countries.
I don't dispute that.
However, from a USA perspective Israel doesn't want those unlike them, that's us,
wiped off the earth.
Israel didn't knock down the twin towers.
Israel isn't trying to attack the usa, look at the last few weeks.
Etc.
Any evidence of Israel plotting bombs, terrorism in the USA?
On 2026-03-21, pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2026-03-21, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2026-03-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-20 1:04 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-19, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-19 4:32 a.m., RonB wrote:In what way, specifically, was Iran a "serious threat" to the West?
On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2026-03-18 3:41 a.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:As I explained to my wife, NATO allies stepping to defend the Strait is
On 2026-03-17 6:10 p.m., RonB wrote:
On 2026-03-17, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Brazil's Age Verification Law is in Effect, Ubuntu Being Monitored for
Compliance
<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/brazils-age-verification-law-is-in>
Brazil monitoring 37 companies, including Canonical, Valve, & more.
System76 bans users for asking about age verification. Rockstar Games &
Arch Linux 32 restrict access in Brazil.
My take: The age of privacy is now effectively over. If you use Linux,
it will be because you truly believe that it is a superior operating
system, not because you believe that it will improve your privacy or
security.
More build-up for the world-wide Electronic Gulag. That's the real reason
corporations are so crazed about this AI bullshit. I hope Iran knocks some
more server farms while they're at it.
I don't believe that Iran will be doing much more damage going forward.
As much as the media wants us to believe that the US and Israel are >>>>>>>>>> failing miserably over there, there is no substance whatsoever to their
claims.
I think you're mistaken here. I've seen the satellite images. There's >>>>>>>>> basically no radars or working U.S. bases left in the Gulf (or even Jordan).
And now they're hitting Israel after yet another "decapitation" murder by
the genocidal Zionists. I know the Strait of Hormuz is still closed (to all
but the Chinese, it seems). Meanwhile the U.S. is keeping their battle ships
far out of range, while Trump (who claims the Iranians are decimated) is
whining that no one in NATO will help. (He wants their ships to get blown
up.) So which is it? Are the Iranians defeated, or does Trump need the help
of the NATO countries (the ones he keeps leveling tariffs on and insulting).
If the war is over, why does NATO matter to him? It doesn't add up. >>>>>>>>
evidence that there is still a point to there even being a NATO. If the
United States is to be tasked with defending the European "allies," they
should at least be willing to help Americans in this one task. If they >>>>>>>> are unwilling to do so, NATO might as well cease to exist.
NATO should have been disbanded 35 years ago when the Soviet Union >>>>>>> collapsed.
I could understand that they wanted it to stick around for a little bit, >>>>>> just to see if the Communist garbage was going to re-emerge. However, >>>>>> considering how little the "allies" actually invested in it, the
American governments should have been in a hurry to disband it.
Iran is hitting more and more of the U.S. owned oil infrastructure in the
Gulf. Apparently they hit the Saudi Arabia's Red Sea terminal for their >>>>>>> pipeline that was supposed to avoid the trouble in the Persian Gulf. (I >>>>>>> pretty much saw that coming.) Gas is now up to $4.09 a gallon where I live
(was at $2.69 a gallon when Trump and NutYahoo started this war). This is
what you get when you have warmongering moron and a genocidal NutYahoo butt
kisser for a president.
Iran has (apparently) hit Saudi Arabia's "alternate route" — an oil pipeline
to the Red Sea at Yanbu. I pretty much figured that would happen. I guess
maybe the U.S. and Israel shouldn't have started bombing Iran's oil >>>>>>> facilities. What comes around goes around.
Iran is also threatening to cut the underwater Internet cables in the Gulf
and the Red Sea. Which would disrupt 17% of worldwide Internet traffic (the
Gulf States have huge AI server farms on their territory).
Iran is threatening to cut off underwater Internet cables to the Gulf
states if they continue to host American military forces there. >>>>>>>
Cables passing through the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea transmit 17%
of the world's traffic, including to artificial intelligence centers in
the UAE and Saudi Arabia, which could potentially lead to months-long
disruptions in operations.
This war could very well destroy the "West's" economy. Trump was warned >>>>>>> about this but the moron "knew better."
Honestly, what this war _should_ do is encourage North Americans to >>>>>> demand that the oil supplies of our continent actually deliver the >>>>>> product. There is no excuse for Canada capping Alberta in the knees and >>>>>> preventing them from transporting their oil to the East coast, and there >>>>>> is no reason for anyone to buy from the Middle East when there is oil >>>>>> near us in Venezuela either. Either way, I know that Iran was indeed a >>>>>> serious threat and since I know that Islam and their terror is a genuine >>>>>> problem in the West, I am happy to see the Americans and Israel
decimating their sponsors. I can spend another few bucks on gas if I >>>>>> know that the muhammedans and their awful religion loses influence. >>>>>
They sponsored the terrorist groups in Gaza and Lebanon in particular >>>> which enforced Islamic values in the country and caused anyone with
common sense to escape the country. This wouldn't be a significant issue >>>> if Islamists didn't integrate the ranks of the people with common sense >>>> to flood the West with like-minded barbarians who want to take over our >>>> society and enact Sharia law. Similarly, the West was still in a
position that if Iran threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz, it could >>>> retaliate and put the country in its place. Had they been allowed to
continue stockpiling weapons and working towards the nukes as they
provably were (they had enriched the uranium to 60% >>>><https://armscontrolcenter.org/irans-stockpile-of-highly-enriched-uranium-worth-bargaining-for/>),
they would have eventually been in a position where they could do
whatever they wish around there and the West would have had no way of >>>> retaliating.
Gaza and Lebanon are not the "West." We sponsor the worst terrorist group in
the world, the genocidal Israelis. Who's land is being taken on the West >>> Bank, Gaza and in Syria and Lebanon? It's definitely not Israeli land that's
being stolen.
Why are you so sure that the land belongs to anyone other than Israel?
Both sides have reasonable arguments as to who owns the land.
What do you base your comments on?
What are the "reasonable" arguments for Israel stealing Palestinian land? The
Palestinians (in good faith) took them in during and after World War II, only to have the bastards steal the land from their hosts. Israel is parasite country. Calling modern Israel the Israel of the Bible, doesn't make it so. That Israel ceased to exist in 70 A.D. It's purpose was fulfilled.
You talk about Sharia law, but totally ignore the Jews referring to non-Jews
as "goyim," (cattle). Their Talmud teaches that land owned by the goyim can
be taken at any time. It's considered "unoccupied land" because no "people"
live there. The Jews teach that they are "exceptional" the "chosen" people.
Really the *only* people. All others are animals. That's why they have no >>> problem murdering women and children when they "mow the grass" in Gaza. >>> NutYahoo refers to the Gazans as "Amaleks" the tribe God told true
(Biblical) Israel to wipe out — every man, woman and child. They apply this
bullshit to the Gazans. And AIPAC (Rothschilds) in the U.S. gives cover for
these genocidal thugs.
Ok.
So in modern times, where are examples of Jews attacking those unlike them, meaning
Christians etc?
Gaza. Lebanon. Syria — and, using (mostly) the United States as their proxy,
Iraq and Iran. The Israelis have no problem killing Christian Palestinians and Lebanese as well as Muslims. Every month they steal more land on the West Bank. Thugs from the United States (dual citizens of the U.S. and Israel) go to the West Bank, cut down orchards, kill sheep and burn down Palestinian homes. After all, they're only goyim, aren't they? And this is "unoccupied" land. No "people" live there and own property.
Do you have concrete evidence of Jews invading hostile areas and raping, killing
people, taking hostages and so forth?
Where is the evidence?
Have you been totally ignoring the news of the genocide in Gaza and the theft of land in the West Bank, Lebanon and Syria? You need to widen your scope of reading beyond the MSM (owned and controlled by the Rothschild cabal).
It takes about 10 seconds to dig up atrocious crimes of October 7th.
Compared to sixty years of Israelis "mowing the grass" in the open air gulag of Gaza? How many Israelis died on October 7th (and how many were killed by "friendly" fire)? How many tens of thousands of Gazans have been murdered or starved out by the genocidal thugs in Israel? There's no comparison. You would have to be completely blind not to see the discrepancy. (How many Iranians die each day now in Iran because of U.S. and Israeli carpet bombing of Tehran?) Wake up and smell the reality.
Any equivalent done by Jews?
No, no equivalent. The Israelis are genocidal. The Palestinians are oppressed and have the right to try to break out of their prison and take back the land stolen from them. And Iran has the right to support their cause. Point, blank, period.
Israel claims a combination of their God of the Bible and history proves
it's their land.
Basically they claim to be the indigenous people of the land and for thousands of years.
Various archaeological evidence.
On 2026-03-21, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
What are the "reasonable" arguments for Israel stealing Palestinian land? The
Palestinians (in good faith) took them in during and after World War II,
only to have the bastards steal the land from their hosts. Israel is
parasite country. Calling modern Israel the Israel of the Bible, doesn't
make it so. That Israel ceased to exist in 70 A.D. It's purpose was
fulfilled.
Israel claims a combination of their God of the Bible and history proves it's their land.
Basically they claim to be the indigenous people of the land and for thousands of years.
Various archaeological evidence.
And the Palestinians claim similar reasons although technically they didn't exist as a group
until sometime in the 1960's. However the ancient people of the area, Egyptians, Jordanians, Syrians,
and others can be traced to modern day people as well.
And then of course in modern times we have the disaster the UN caused which has resulted
in the political angle being pushed currently.
Gaza. Lebanon. Syria — and, using (mostly) the United States as their proxy,
Iraq and Iran. The Israelis have no problem killing Christian Palestinians >> and Lebanese as well as Muslims. Every month they steal more land on the
West Bank. Thugs from the United States (dual citizens of the U.S. and
Israel) go to the West Bank, cut down orchards, kill sheep and burn down
Palestinian homes. After all, they're only goyim, aren't they? And this is >> "unoccupied" land. No "people" live there and own property.
It's a war.
However, do you have some cites for the above?
Having grown up in NYC where my neighborhood was truly a melting pot
and bordering on an area that was mostly Hasidic Jews (the penguins), there was NEVER a problem. They kept to themselves and followed their religion.
The stores and shops in that area were closed on Saturday and open on Sunday where shops in my area were closed.
These days?
It's a war zone and in the press almost weekly.
Guess why?
I'll give you a hint, it ain't the penguins.
Have you been totally ignoring the news of the genocide in Gaza and the
theft of land in the West Bank, Lebanon and Syria? You need to widen your >> scope of reading beyond the MSM (owned and controlled by the Rothschild
cabal).
You are not offering proof.
I give you Oct 7th.
What do you have?
Compared to sixty years of Israelis "mowing the grass" in the open air gulag
of Gaza? How many Israelis died on October 7th (and how many were killed by >> "friendly" fire)? How many tens of thousands of Gazans have been murdered or
starved out by the genocidal thugs in Israel? There's no comparison. You
would have to be completely blind not to see the discrepancy. (How many
Iranians die each day now in Iran because of U.S. and Israeli carpet bombing
of Tehran?) Wake up and smell the reality.
So where are the cites showing this?
You are going in circles with conspiracy theories.
As for Iran, they killed more than 30,000 of their own people in the past months.
They just had public hangings of 3 people whose only "crime" was peaceful protesting.
And how many Americans and others have they killed since 1979 despite all the attempts
at appeasement ie:pallets of cash?
Any Jews knocking down buildings?
Throwing gays off rooftops?
Beheading people?
Shouting death to Israel and America?
I'm not seeing it.
I am however seeing Islamist's creating havoc all over the world daily.
We recently had 3 or 4 attacks in the USA.
Is it the Jews again?
No, no equivalent. The Israelis are genocidal. The Palestinians are
oppressed and have the right to try to break out of their prison and take >> back the land stolen from them. And Iran has the right to support their
cause. Point, blank, period.
But you still have not proven that the land belongs to them.
As for Iran, I oppose the war however I also have enough common sense
to realize that when a regime like Iran's, who is funding terrorist
proxy groups like Hamas and others and who are on a pilgrimage to wipe
out the USA should not have nuclear weapons.
I snipped the rest because you are wandering all over the place with conspiracy theories, the Rothschild's and so forth.
As for the Congress critters, they are all corrupt. And if they didn't start out corrupt they quickly learned how to play the game.
The place really is a swamp.
Both sides.
At this point, I would like to see the US pull out and let the Iranian
people decide what type of government they want moving forward. I have always been against the US being involved in nation building.
I'm an isolationist in that respect.
WRT to the Palestinian Israel issue a two state solution is my choice.
On Sat, 21 Mar 2026 14:49:07 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Israel claims a combination of their God of the Bible and history proves
it's their land.
Basically they claim to be the indigenous people of the land and for
thousands of years.
Various archaeological evidence.
There are a lot of people that would like the land their ancestors lived
on 2000 years ago but they are shit out of luck. They don't own most of
the politicians and confused Christians that didn't get the message about
a new covenant.
On Sat, 21 Mar 2026 14:49:07 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Israel claims a combination of their God of the Bible and history proves
it's their land.
Basically they claim to be the indigenous people of the land and for
thousands of years.
Various archaeological evidence.
There are a lot of people that would like the land their ancestors lived
on 2000 years ago but they are shit out of luck. They don't own most of
the politicians and confused Christians that didn't get the message about
a new covenant.
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,104 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 492389:50:38 |
| Calls: | 14,151 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 186,281 |
| D/L today: |
2,700 files (1,032M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,501,210 |
| Posted today: | 1 |