One justice summed up a ruling mandating biological males access to a Christian-owned, women-only nude Korean spa plainly. Other justices were unamused.
A Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judge offered a stark dissent in a
case involving a spa for women that refused service to transgender
people, saying it “is a case about swinging dicks.”
Nearly 30 U.S. appeals court judges have issued written rebukes in
response to the judge for his dissent.
VanDyke continued, “You may think that swinging dicks shouldn’t---appear
in a judicial opinion. You’re not wrong. But as much as you might understandably be shocked and displeased to merely encounter that---phrase
in this opinion, I hope we all can agree that it is far more jarring for
the unsuspecting and exposed women at Olympus Spa – some as young as thirteen – to be visually assaulted by the real thing.”
for forcing it to serve transgender people.
A transgender person complained about the spa’s policy, and in 2020 the state’s Human Rights Commission issued a complaint against Olympus Spa.
Olympus Spa – which offers massages, body scrubs and hot tubs that
require nudity – responded by suing the state, arguing that the Human Rights Commission is violating its First Amendment rights to free
exercise of religion, freedom of speech and right of association.
ruled last year that Olympus Spa cannot sue the state on First Amendment grounds over the transgender policy.
Olympus Spa requested a rehearing by the Ninth Circuit.
on Thursday, with Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke, a Trump-appointee, providing a colorful dissent.
“This is a case about swinging dicks. The Christian owners of Olympus
Spa – a traditional Korean, women-only, nude spa – understandably don’t want them in their spa,” VanDyke wrote. “Their female employees and female clients don’t want them in their spa either. But Washington State insists on them. And now so does the Ninth Circuit.”
VanDyke continued, “You may think that swinging dicks shouldn’t appear
in a judicial opinion. You’re not wrong. But as much as you might understandably be shocked and displeased to merely encounter that phrase
in this opinion, I hope we all can agree that it is far more jarring for
the unsuspecting and exposed women at Olympus Spa – some as young as thirteen – to be visually assaulted by the real thing.”
VanDyke added that it feels that the supposed adults in the room have collectively lost their minds.
“Woke regulators and complicit judges seem entirely willing, even eager,
to ignore the consequences that their Frankenstein social experiments
impose on real women and young girls,” VanDyke wrote.
denounced VanDyke’s language as “vulgar barroom talk.”
https://sjvsun.com/u-s/a-case-about-swinging-dicks-ninth-circuit-justice- cuts-to-chase-in-transgenders-spa-appeal/
On 3/16/26 22:39, J. Carter wrote:
One justice summed up a ruling mandating biological males access to a
Christian-owned, women-only nude Korean spa plainly. Other justices were
unamused.
A Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judge offered a stark dissent in a
case involving a spa for women that refused service to transgender
people, saying it “is a case about swinging dicks.”
Nearly 30 U.S. appeals court judges have issued written rebukes in
response to the judge for his dissent.
Those "rebukers" should be purged from all realms where
common sense should allowed to reign.
Judge VanDyke is exactly correct.
This is in my city of Lynnwood.
My wife and daughter used to like going to that spa
a couple times a year.
The trouble causing instigator is not mild mannerly
just wishing to use a facility,
they are enjoying stiring up animosity by using
the law to force others to have to put up with
them swinging their dick in front of offended women.
On 3/17/2026 2:05 PM, a425couple wrote:
On 3/16/26 22:39, J. Carter wrote:
One justice summed up a ruling mandating biological males access
to a Christian-owned, women-only nude Korean spa plainly. Other
justices were unamused.
A Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judge offered a stark
dissent in a case involving a spa for women that refused service
to transgender people, saying it “is a case about swinging dicks.”
Nearly 30 U.S. appeals court judges have issued written rebukes in
response to the judge for his dissent.
Those "rebukers" should be purged from all realms where
common sense should allowed to reign.
Judge VanDyke is exactly correct.
This is in my city of Lynnwood.
My wife and daughter used to like going to that spa
a couple times a year.
The trouble causing instigator is not mild mannerly
just wishing to use a facility,
they are enjoying stiring up animosity by using
the law to force others to have to put up with
them swinging their dick in front of offended women.
It's not the penis that's the problem, most of these trans women areMeaning sexual hostility is a crime, trans or straight.
not going to harm anything, but it only takes one who has a
personality issue to make it uncomfortable and even unsafe.
The club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op trans women,Legally speaking that is commensurate with non-surgical or
it's not entirely "fair" per se but it's what they have to,Of course it's fair.
unfortunately, do.
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:44:54 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/17/2026 2:05 PM, a425couple wrote:
On 3/16/26 22:39, J. Carter wrote:
One justice summed up a ruling mandating biological males access
to a Christian-owned, women-only nude Korean spa plainly. Other
justices were unamused.
A Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judge offered a stark
dissent in a case involving a spa for women that refused service
to transgender people, saying it “is a case about swinging dicks.” >>>>
Nearly 30 U.S. appeals court judges have issued written rebukes in
response to the judge for his dissent.
Those "rebukers" should be purged from all realms where
common sense should allowed to reign.
Judge VanDyke is exactly correct.
This is in my city of Lynnwood.
My wife and daughter used to like going to that spa
a couple times a year.
The trouble causing instigator is not mild mannerly
just wishing to use a facility,
they are enjoying stiring up animosity by using
the law to force others to have to put up with
them swinging their dick in front of offended women.
It's not the penis that's the problem, most of these trans women are
not going to harm anything, but it only takes one who has a
personality issue to make it uncomfortable and even unsafe.
Meaning sexual hostility is a crime, trans or straight.
The club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op trans women,
Legally speaking that is commensurate with non-surgical or
"actual women".
it's not entirely "fair" per se but it's what they have to,
unfortunately, do.
Of course it's fair.
The same holds for men not wishing trans women or even natural women be allowed in their locker facilities.
On 3/17/2026 2:05 PM, a425couple wrote:
On 3/16/26 22:39, J. Carter wrote:
One justice summed up a ruling mandating biological males access to
a Christian-owned, women-only nude Korean spa plainly. Other
justices were unamused.
A Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judge offered a stark dissent
in a case involving a spa for women that refused service to
transgender people, saying it “is a case about swinging dicks.”
Nearly 30 U.S. appeals court judges have issued written rebukes in
response to the judge for his dissent.
Those "rebukers" should be purged from all realms where
common sense should allowed to reign.
Judge VanDyke is exactly correct.
This is in my city of Lynnwood.
My wife and daughter used to like going to that spa
a couple times a year.
The trouble causing instigator is not mild mannerly
just wishing to use a facility,
they are enjoying stiring up animosity by using
the law to force others to have to put up with
them swinging their dick in front of offended women.
It's not the penis that's the problem, most of these trans women are
not going to harm anything, but it only takes one who has a
personality issue to make it uncomfortable and even unsafe. The
club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op trans women,
it's not entirely "fair" per se but it's what they have to,
unfortunately, do.
Bill Taylor <nobody@nymu.eu> wrote in news:47df2e5b25732e61706ced7d2784a22c@dizum.com:
On 17 Mar 2026, "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some news:HihuR.7846$1vW9.2218@fx09.iad:
On 3/17/2026 2:05 PM, a425couple wrote:
On 3/16/26 22:39, J. Carter wrote:
One justice summed up a ruling mandating biological males access
to a Christian-owned, women-only nude Korean spa plainly. Other
justices were unamused.
A Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judge offered a stark
dissent in a case involving a spa for women that refused service
to transgender people, saying it “is a case about swinging
dicks.”
Nearly 30 U.S. appeals court judges have issued written rebukes
in response to the judge for his dissent.
Those "rebukers" should be purged from all realms where
common sense should allowed to reign.
Judge VanDyke is exactly correct.
This is in my city of Lynnwood.
My wife and daughter used to like going to that spa
a couple times a year.
The trouble causing instigator is not mild mannerly
just wishing to use a facility,
they are enjoying stiring up animosity by using
the law to force others to have to put up with
them swinging their dick in front of offended women.
It's not the penis that's the problem, most of these trans women
are not going to harm anything, but it only takes one who has a
personality issue to make it uncomfortable and even unsafe. The
club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op trans
women, it's not entirely "fair" per se but it's what they have to,
unfortunately, do.
There's no such thing as a "trans woman". "It" is just a socially dysfunctional sick person trying to game established principles and
force everyone to accept them.
Yawn, just another anti-trans bigot.
On 3/17/2026 3:44 PM, blank verse wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:44:54 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/17/2026 2:05 PM, a425couple wrote:
On 3/16/26 22:39, J. Carter wrote:
One justice summed up a ruling mandating biological males access
to a Christian-owned, women-only nude Korean spa plainly. Other
justices were unamused.
A Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judge offered a stark
dissent in a case involving a spa for women that refused service
to transgender people, saying it “is a case about swinging
dicks.”
Nearly 30 U.S. appeals court judges have issued written rebukes
in response to the judge for his dissent.
Those "rebukers" should be purged from all realms where
common sense should allowed to reign.
Judge VanDyke is exactly correct.
This is in my city of Lynnwood.
My wife and daughter used to like going to that spa
a couple times a year.
The trouble causing instigator is not mild mannerly
just wishing to use a facility,
they are enjoying stiring up animosity by using
the law to force others to have to put up with
them swinging their dick in front of offended women.
It's not the penis that's the problem, most of these trans women
are not going to harm anything, but it only takes one who has a
personality issue to make it uncomfortable and even unsafe.
Meaning sexual hostility is a crime, trans or straight.
Yeah ...Try not to choke on that basic truth.
The club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op trans
women,
Legally speaking that is commensurate with non-surgical or
"actual women".
No, it's because a post-op trans woman can't use her now mutilatedOf course that can still happen.
cock to attack someone.
I don't recommend this surgery, regardlessYour narcissism defines you.
of the club's policy, I understand some really feel they need it, but
I like them to have the penis and nuts, it's a feature for me.
it's not entirely "fair" per se but it's what they have to,
unfortunately, do.
Of course it's fair.
The same holds for men not wishing trans women or even natural
women be allowed in their locker facilities.
People in your camp supposedly want trans women in the men's lockerI have no "camp".
room.
I guess you're just spouting off without research.Where's your statistically objective survey of locker room
On 17 Mar 2026, "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some news:HihuR.7846$1vW9.2218@fx09.iad:
On 3/17/2026 2:05 PM, a425couple wrote:
On 3/16/26 22:39, J. Carter wrote:
One justice summed up a ruling mandating biological males access to
a Christian-owned, women-only nude Korean spa plainly. Other
justices were unamused.
A Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judge offered a stark dissent
in a case involving a spa for women that refused service to
transgender people, saying it “is a case about swinging dicks.”
Nearly 30 U.S. appeals court judges have issued written rebukes in
response to the judge for his dissent.
Those "rebukers" should be purged from all realms where
common sense should allowed to reign.
Judge VanDyke is exactly correct.
This is in my city of Lynnwood.
My wife and daughter used to like going to that spa
a couple times a year.
The trouble causing instigator is not mild mannerly
just wishing to use a facility,
they are enjoying stiring up animosity by using
the law to force others to have to put up with
them swinging their dick in front of offended women.
It's not the penis that's the problem, most of these trans women are
not going to harm anything, but it only takes one who has a
personality issue to make it uncomfortable and even unsafe. The
club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op trans women,
it's not entirely "fair" per se but it's what they have to,
unfortunately, do.
There's no such thing as a "trans woman". "It" is just a socially dysfunctional sick person trying to game established principles and force everyone to accept them.
There's no such thing as a "trans woman". "It" is just a socially dysfunctional sick person trying to game established principles and
force everyone to accept them.
Uh huh, you're so sure of that that you posted through the most
notorious remailer. Right.
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:07:49 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/17/2026 3:44 PM, blank verse wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:44:54 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
The club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op trans
women,
Legally speaking that is commensurate with non-surgical or
"actual women".
No, it's because a post-op trans woman can't use her now mutilated
cock to attack someone.
Of course that can still happen.
I don't recommend this surgery, regardless
of the club's policy, I understand some really feel they need it, but
I like them to have the penis and nuts, it's a feature for me.
Your narcissism defines you.
There's no such thing as a "trans woman". "It" is just a socially
dysfunctional sick person trying to game established principles and
force everyone to accept them.
Uh huh, you're so sure of that that you posted through the most
notorious remailer. Right.
Again - "shoot the messenger" is not an adequate rebuttal.
You know that.
Bill Taylor <nobody@nymu.eu> wrote in >news:47df2e5b25732e61706ced7d2784a22c@dizum.com:
On 17 Mar 2026, "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some
news:HihuR.7846$1vW9.2218@fx09.iad:
On 3/17/2026 2:05 PM, a425couple wrote:
On 3/16/26 22:39, J. Carter wrote:
One justice summed up a ruling mandating biological males access to
a Christian-owned, women-only nude Korean spa plainly. Other
justices were unamused.
A Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judge offered a stark dissent
in a case involving a spa for women that refused service to
transgender people, saying it “is a case about swinging dicks.?
Nearly 30 U.S. appeals court judges have issued written rebukes in
response to the judge for his dissent.
Those "rebukers" should be purged from all realms where
common sense should allowed to reign.
Judge VanDyke is exactly correct.
This is in my city of Lynnwood.
My wife and daughter used to like going to that spa
a couple times a year.
The trouble causing instigator is not mild mannerly
just wishing to use a facility,
they are enjoying stiring up animosity by using
the law to force others to have to put up with
them swinging their dick in front of offended women.
It's not the penis that's the problem, most of these trans women are
not going to harm anything, but it only takes one who has a
personality issue to make it uncomfortable and even unsafe. The
club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op trans women,
it's not entirely "fair" per se but it's what they have to,
unfortunately, do.
There's no such thing as a "trans woman". "It" is just a socially
dysfunctional sick person trying to game established principles and
force everyone to accept them.
Yawn, just another anti-trans bigot.
On 3/18/2026 12:20 PM, Pops Tart wrote:
There's no such thing as a "trans woman". "It" is just a socially
dysfunctional sick person trying to game established principles and
force everyone to accept them.
Uh huh, you're so sure of that that you posted through the most
notorious remailer. Right.
Again - "shoot the messenger" is not an adequate rebuttal.
You know that.
It's not doing that.
On 3/18/2026 11:36 AM, Pops Tart wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:07:49 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/17/2026 3:44 PM, blank verse wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:44:54 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
The club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op trans
women,
Legally speaking that is commensurate with non-surgical or
"actual women".
No, it's because a post-op trans woman can't use her now mutilated
cock to attack someone.
Of course that can still happen.
You don't know much about vaginoplasty done on a biological male, do you?
[Default] Webbster <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
Bill Taylor <nobody@nymu.eu> wrote in
news:47df2e5b25732e61706ced7d2784a22c@dizum.com:
On 17 Mar 2026, "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some
news:HihuR.7846$1vW9.2218@fx09.iad:
On 3/17/2026 2:05 PM, a425couple wrote:
On 3/16/26 22:39, J. Carter wrote:
One justice summed up a ruling mandating biological males access to >>>>>> a Christian-owned, women-only nude Korean spa plainly. Other
justices were unamused.
A Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judge offered a stark dissent >>>>>> in a case involving a spa for women that refused service to
transgender people, saying it “is a case about swinging dicks.�
Nearly 30 U.S. appeals court judges have issued written rebukes in >>>>>> response to the judge for his dissent.
Those "rebukers" should be purged from all realms where
common sense should allowed to reign.
Judge VanDyke is exactly correct.
This is in my city of Lynnwood.
My wife and daughter used to like going to that spa
a couple times a year.
The trouble causing instigator is not mild mannerly
just wishing to use a facility,
they are enjoying stiring up animosity by using
the law to force others to have to put up with
them swinging their dick in front of offended women.
It's not the penis that's the problem, most of these trans women are
not going to harm anything, but it only takes one who has a
personality issue to make it uncomfortable and even unsafe. The
club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op trans women,
it's not entirely "fair" per se but it's what they have to,
unfortunately, do.
There's no such thing as a "trans woman". "It" is just a socially
dysfunctional sick person trying to game established principles and
force everyone to accept them.
Yawn, just another anti-trans bigot.
Another Anti-Reality groomer.
[Default] "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
On 3/18/2026 11:36 AM, Pops Tart wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:07:49 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/17/2026 3:44 PM, blank verse wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:44:54 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
The club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op trans
women,
Legally speaking that is commensurate with non-surgical or
"actual women".
No, it's because a post-op trans woman can't use her now mutilated
cock to attack someone.
Of course that can still happen.
You don't know much about vaginoplasty done on a biological male, do you?
This much we do know:
https://i.imgur.com/0aBASHp.jpg
On 2026-03-18 3:21 p.m., Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
On 3/18/2026 11:36 AM, Pops Tart wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:07:49 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/17/2026 3:44 PM, blank verse wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:44:54 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
The club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op trans >>>>>>> women,
Legally speaking that is commensurate with non-surgical or
"actual women".
No, it's because a post-op trans woman can't use her now mutilated
cock to attack someone.
Of course that can still happen.
You don't know much about vaginoplasty done on a biological male, do
you?
This much we do know:
https://i.imgur.com/0aBASHp.jpg
Transsexuals wish they looked as good as the swamp thing.
CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2026-03-18 3:21 p.m., Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:Watch out, Joel is going to call you a retard. Those are good looking
[Default] "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
On 3/18/2026 11:36 AM, Pops Tart wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:07:49 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/17/2026 3:44 PM, blank verse wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:44:54 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
The club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op trans >>>>>>>> women,
Legally speaking that is commensurate with non-surgical or
"actual women".
No, it's because a post-op trans woman can't use her now mutilated >>>>>> cock to attack someone.
Of course that can still happen.
You don't know much about vaginoplasty done on a biological male, do
you?
This much we do know:
https://i.imgur.com/0aBASHp.jpg
Transsexuals wish they looked as good as the swamp thing.
girls!
On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 14:50:09 -0000 (UTC)
Webbster <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Bill Taylor <nobody@nymu.eu> wrote in
news:47df2e5b25732e61706ced7d2784a22c@dizum.com:
On 17 Mar 2026, "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some
news:HihuR.7846$1vW9.2218@fx09.iad:
On 3/17/2026 2:05 PM, a425couple wrote:
On 3/16/26 22:39, J. Carter wrote:
One justice summed up a ruling mandating biological males access
to a Christian-owned, women-only nude Korean spa plainly. Other
justices were unamused.
A Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judge offered a stark
dissent in a case involving a spa for women that refused service
to transgender people, saying it “is a case about swinging
dicks.”
Nearly 30 U.S. appeals court judges have issued written rebukes
in response to the judge for his dissent.
Those "rebukers" should be purged from all realms where
common sense should allowed to reign.
Judge VanDyke is exactly correct.
This is in my city of Lynnwood.
My wife and daughter used to like going to that spa
a couple times a year.
The trouble causing instigator is not mild mannerly
just wishing to use a facility,
they are enjoying stiring up animosity by using
the law to force others to have to put up with
them swinging their dick in front of offended women.
It's not the penis that's the problem, most of these trans women
are not going to harm anything, but it only takes one who has a
personality issue to make it uncomfortable and even unsafe. The
club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op trans
women, it's not entirely "fair" per se but it's what they have to,
unfortunately, do.
There's no such thing as a "trans woman". "It" is just a socially
dysfunctional sick person trying to game established principles and
force everyone to accept them.
Yawn, just another anti-trans bigot.
Just another nutless apologist for perversion,
On 2026-03-18 3:21 p.m., Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
[Default] "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
On 3/18/2026 11:36 AM, Pops Tart wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:07:49 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/17/2026 3:44 PM, blank verse wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:44:54 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
The club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op
trans women,
Legally speaking that is commensurate with non-surgical or
"actual women".
No, it's because a post-op trans woman can't use her now mutilated
cock to attack someone.
Of course that can still happen.
You don't know much about vaginoplasty done on a biological male, do
you?
This much we do know:
https://i.imgur.com/0aBASHp.jpg
Transsexuals wish they looked as good as the swamp thing.
CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2026-03-18 3:21 p.m., Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:Watch out, Joel is going to call you a retard. Those are good looking
[Default] "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
On 3/18/2026 11:36 AM, Pops Tart wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:07:49 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/17/2026 3:44 PM, blank verse wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:44:54 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
The club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op
trans women,
Legally speaking that is commensurate with non-surgical or
"actual women".
No, it's because a post-op trans woman can't use her now
mutilated cock to attack someone.
Of course that can still happen.
You don't know much about vaginoplasty done on a biological male,
do you?
This much we do know:
https://i.imgur.com/0aBASHp.jpg
Transsexuals wish they looked as good as the swamp thing.
girls!
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in
news:n20f6rFsd79U1@mid.individual.net:
CrudeSausage wrote:And KKKlaun is a creature made up to look like a man.
On 2026-03-18 3:21 p.m., Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:Watch out, Joel is going to call you a retard. Those are good looking
[Default] "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
On 3/18/2026 11:36 AM, Pops Tart wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:07:49 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/17/2026 3:44 PM, blank verse wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:44:54 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
The club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op
trans women,
Legally speaking that is commensurate with non-surgical or
"actual women".
No, it's because a post-op trans woman can't use her now
mutilated cock to attack someone.
Of course that can still happen.
You don't know much about vaginoplasty done on a biological male,
do you?
This much we do know:
https://i.imgur.com/0aBASHp.jpg
Transsexuals wish they looked as good as the swamp thing.
girls!
[Default] Webbster <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
And KKKlaun is a creature made up to look like a man.
On 3/18/2026 11:36 AM, Pops Tart wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:07:49 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/17/2026 3:44 PM, blank verse wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:44:54 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
The club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op trans
women,
Legally speaking that is commensurate with non-surgical or
"actual women".
No, it's because a post-op trans woman can't use her now mutilated
cock to attack someone.
Of course that can still happen.
You don't know much about vaginoplasty done on a biological male, do
you?
I don't recommend this surgery, regardless
of the club's policy, I understand some really feel they need it,
but I like them to have the penis and nuts, it's a feature for me.
Your narcissism defines you.
Your retardation is loud and obnoxious.
On 3/18/2026 12:20 PM, Pops Tart wrote:
There's no such thing as a "trans woman". "It" is just a socially
dysfunctional sick person trying to game established principles
and force everyone to accept them.
Uh huh, you're so sure of that that you posted through the most
notorious remailer. Right.
Again - "shoot the messenger" is not an adequate rebuttal.
You know that.
It's not doing that. People using remailers especially that one are trolling, never anything else.Oh lookie, you deem yourself omniscient to parse the intent of 'all',
'
Pops Tart <cin@a.mon> wrote in news:20260318093106.25712233@z-z:
On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 14:50:09 -0000 (UTC)
Webbster <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Bill Taylor <nobody@nymu.eu> wrote in
news:47df2e5b25732e61706ced7d2784a22c@dizum.com:
On 17 Mar 2026, "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some
news:HihuR.7846$1vW9.2218@fx09.iad:
On 3/17/2026 2:05 PM, a425couple wrote:
On 3/16/26 22:39, J. Carter wrote:
One justice summed up a ruling mandating biological males
access to a Christian-owned, women-only nude Korean spa
plainly. Other justices were unamused.
A Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judge offered a stark
dissent in a case involving a spa for women that refused
service to transgender people, saying it “is a case about
swinging dicks.”
Nearly 30 U.S. appeals court judges have issued written
rebukes in response to the judge for his dissent.
Those "rebukers" should be purged from all realms where
common sense should allowed to reign.
Judge VanDyke is exactly correct.
This is in my city of Lynnwood.
My wife and daughter used to like going to that spa
a couple times a year.
The trouble causing instigator is not mild mannerly
just wishing to use a facility,
they are enjoying stiring up animosity by using
the law to force others to have to put up with
them swinging their dick in front of offended women.
It's not the penis that's the problem, most of these trans women
are not going to harm anything, but it only takes one who has a
personality issue to make it uncomfortable and even unsafe. The
club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op trans
women, it's not entirely "fair" per se but it's what they have
to, unfortunately, do.
There's no such thing as a "trans woman". "It" is just a
socially dysfunctional sick person trying to game established
principles and force everyone to accept them.
Yawn, just another anti-trans bigot.
Just another nutless apologist for perversion,
Spammy pops up again.
And KKKlaun is a creature made upBusiness for sale:
[Default] Webbster <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:<GUFFAW!!!>
phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote in >news:n20f6rFsd79U1@mid.individual.net:
CrudeSausage wrote:And KKKlaun is a creature made up to look like a man.
On 2026-03-18 3:21 p.m., Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:Watch out, Joel is going to call you a retard. Those are good
[Default]Â "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
On 3/18/2026 11:36 AM, Pops Tart wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:07:49 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/17/2026 3:44 PM, blank verse wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:44:54 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
The club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op >>>>>>>>> trans women,
Legally speaking that is commensurate with non-surgical or
"actual women".
No, it's because a post-op trans woman can't use her now
mutilated cock to attack someone.
Of course that can still happen.
You don't know much about vaginoplasty done on a biological
male, do you?
This much we do know:
https://i.imgur.com/0aBASHp.jpg
Transsexuals wish they looked as good as the swamp thing.
looking girls!
Senile Groomer Baxter is so far gone he can't tell a man from a woman
any more.
But he knows children when he sees them.
https://i.imgur.com/w9ktZe1.jpg
he has no morality
On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 12:22:00 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/18/2026 11:36 AM, Pops Tart wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:07:49 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/17/2026 3:44 PM, blank verse wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:44:54 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
The club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op trans
women,
Legally speaking that is commensurate with non-surgical or
"actual women".
No, it's because a post-op trans woman can't use her now mutilated
cock to attack someone.
Of course that can still happen.
You don't know much about vaginoplasty done on a biological male, do
you?
You don't think even pseudo-genitals can be used topically against one's will?
I don't recommend this surgery, regardless
of the club's policy, I understand some really feel they need it,
but I like them to have the penis and nuts, it's a feature for me.
Your narcissism defines you.
Your retardation is loud and obnoxious.
You LOSE again, and always.
On 3/19/2026 11:50 AM, Pops Tart wrote:
On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 12:22:00 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/18/2026 11:36 AM, Pops Tart wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:07:49 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/17/2026 3:44 PM, blank verse wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:44:54 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
The club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op
trans women,
Legally speaking that is commensurate with non-surgical or
"actual women".
No, it's because a post-op trans woman can't use her now
mutilated cock to attack someone.
Of course that can still happen.
You don't know much about vaginoplasty done on a biological male,
do you?
You don't think even pseudo-genitals can be used topically against
one's will?
How is that different than a biological female putting her vagina "topically",
heh, what a dumb comment. They no longer have a penis
in any meaningful sense. They can't rape anyone with it.
I don't recommend this surgery, regardless
of the club's policy, I understand some really feel they need it,
but I like them to have the penis and nuts, it's a feature for
me.
Your narcissism defines you.
Your retardation is loud and obnoxious.
You LOSE again, and always.
Says you, perhaps,
I'm hardly worried what my opponent thinks.
And KKKlaun is a creature made up to look like a man.
Senile Groomer Baxter is so far gone he can't tell a man from a woman
any more.
But he knows children when he sees them.
https://i.imgur.com/w9ktZe1.jpg
"You cannot constrain him. He is who he is. Truth matters little to him. >Whats right matters even less, and decency matters not at all.
[Default] Webbster <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:Will it involve livestock?
And KKKlaun is a creature made up to look like a man.
Senile Groomer Baxter is so far gone he can't tell a man from a
woman any more.
But he knows children when he sees them.
https://i.imgur.com/w9ktZe1.jpg
"You cannot constrain him. He is who he is. Truth matters little to
him. What’s right matters even less, and decency matters not at
all.”
Thanks for explaining yourself, Baxter.
Now, do the honorable thing.
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentter.@gmail.com> wrote
in news:h2qnrkds5v3at56t0mvantca94djl3gghl@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com:
[Default] Webbster <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
============And KKKlaun is a creature made up to look like a man.
"You cannot constrain him. He is who he is. Truth matters little to him.
On 3/18/2026 11:36 AM, Pops Tart wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:07:49 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/17/2026 3:44 PM, blank verse wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:44:54 -0400
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
The club's policy in my view is alright, they allow post-op trans
women,
Legally speaking that is commensurate with non-surgical or
"actual women".
No, it's because a post-op trans woman can't use her now mutilated
cock to attack someone.
Of course that can still happen.
You don't know much about vaginoplasty done on a biological male, do
you?
I don't recommend this surgery, regardless
of the club's policy, I understand some really feel they need it,
but I like them to have the penis and nuts, it's a feature for me.
Your narcissism defines you.
Your retardation is loud and obnoxious.
On 3/18/2026 12:20 PM, Pops Tart wrote:
There's no such thing as a "trans woman". "It" is just a socially
dysfunctional sick person trying to game established principles and
force everyone to accept them.
Uh huh, you're so sure of that that you posted through the most
notorious remailer. Right.
Again - "shoot the messenger" is not an adequate rebuttal.
You know that.
It's not doing that. People using remailers especially that one are trolling, never anything else.
On Thu, 19 Mar 2026 11:50:38 -0700
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent_ter.@gmail.com>
wrote:
[Default] Webbster <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
And KKKlaun is a creature made up to look like a man.
Senile Groomer Baxter is so far gone he can't tell a man from a
woman any more.
But he knows children when he sees them.
https://i.imgur.com/w9ktZe1.jpg
"You cannot constrain him. He is who he is. Truth matters little to
him. Whats right matters even less, and decency matters not at
all.
Thanks for explaining yourself, Baxter.
Now, do the honorable thing.
Will it involve livestock?
[Default] Pops Tart <cin@a.mon> typed:Konichiwa.
On Thu, 19 Mar 2026 11:50:38 -0700
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent_ter.@gmail.com>
wrote:
[Default] Webbster <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
And KKKlaun is a creature made up to look like a man.
Senile Groomer Baxter is so far gone he can't tell a man from a
woman any more.
But he knows children when he sees them.
https://i.imgur.com/w9ktZe1.jpg
"You cannot constrain him. He is who he is. Truth matters little
to him. What’s right matters even less, and decency matters not at
all.”
Thanks for explaining yourself, Baxter.
Now, do the honorable thing.
Will it involve livestock?
Hopefully a tanto and a quick beheading by his second.
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,104 |
| Nodes: | 10 (1 / 9) |
| Uptime: | 492386:38:16 |
| Calls: | 14,150 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 186,281 |
| D/L today: |
2,214 files (841M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,501,137 |
