• Re: Fedora Live USBs =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=94?= ahem...

    From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Tue Mar 17 22:04:26 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-03-17, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 05:55:51 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    Zorin looks more like Windows, but it's based on Gnome (which I don't
    like it.) For example, if I want to get of window tiling, you have to
    install the "gnome extensions manager." Why couldn't they just include
    it in the standard install?

    https://zorin.com/os/pro/

    For $48 you can pick your poison. I assume you could create any of those with GNOME extensions if you knew what you were doing. I didn't realize Ubuntu does some tweaking until I ran Leap 16 GNOME, which I think is
    plain vanilla. I didn't try doing anything with it, just blew away the VM and did the KDE install.

    I like Cinnamon, but if I had to choose between Gnome or KDE, I would take KDE. Gnome seems to be in constant flux. They don't seem to be able to
    settle on anything for very long.
    --
    Not all Jews are Zionists. Not all Zionists are Jews. Zionism ≠ Judaism.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Tue Mar 17 22:07:05 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-03-17, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-17 1:55 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-16, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-15 3:11 p.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-15, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-14 10:59 p.m., RonB wrote:
    I found out what went "wrong" with my Live USB Fedora 43 "installs" didn't
    work. (At least the Gnome and KDE versions.) User error. I was downloading
    the Arm .ISOs, which strangely enough, did not work with my Intel CPU. Go
    figure. (Not sure, though, why the Cinnamon didn't work though. There's no
    Arm version of that one offered — maybe I'll try again.)

    This one time, it was user error. However, there are many distributions >>>>> out there which ship broken ISOs which end up not working once
    transferred to a USB thumb drive. It will generally always work with >>>>> Ubuntu and Linux Mint, but smaller distributions like Endeavour can be >>>>> hit or miss.

    I have been testing a Trelby AppImage I made (following someone else's >>>> shell script) so, lately I've tried several Live USB Linux "installs" and I
    have found a couple that didn't work for me. You're right about Linux Mint,
    I've never had any issues with it. That's why I thought this wasn't really a
    problem.

    It's honestly getting to a point where if you're interested in Linux,
    you're best off ignoring the existence of every distribution that isn't
    Mint. With Mint, you can be sure that the ISO works as expected, that it >>> runs on your hardware no matter how old, that the drivers are installed
    correctly, that the best application for every task is installed by
    default and that there is a wealth of technical support available to you >>> from fellow users.

    I just got an email from someone I know (online) from a screenwriting forum. >> He's (finally) about to install Linux computer on his laptop and knows I
    like Mint, but said he wanted to try Zorin. So I downloaded it and tried it >> out with a Live USB. It supposedly defaults to Wayland, so I was curious how >> that would work but, on the Live USB "install" it comes up as X11. (He
    specifically mentioned Wayland and that he thought it would work better than >> Xorg for scaling. He might be right — a little more about that in another >> post.) Zorin looks more like Windows, but it's based on Gnome (which I don't >> like it.) For example, if I want to get of window tiling, you have to
    install the "gnome extensions manager." Why couldn't they just include it in >> the standard install?

    One thing I did like about it, though. I could use my tiny Trelby .deb
    package to install Trelby and works "out of the box." That .deb file is
    literally 22 kbs and it works. It just downloads what it needs. So I was
    happy about that. I would still prefer Linux Mint, though (which also
    installs Trelby with that installation file). As does Debian 13.4.0 (more on >> that in that other post).


    If I were still interested in the operating system, I might be bothered
    to check it out but my interest in Linux has worn me out the way being married to a woman possessed by a demon might.

    If I had to choose between Zorin or Debian KDE, I would choose Debian KDE.
    As a matter of fact, I've installed it on a computer that I had Ubuntu
    Server running on (I was trying to work through a new server for my wife's online classes, but it's been upgraded now online so no longer needed).
    --
    Not all Jews are Zionists. Not all Zionists are Jews. Zionism ≠ Judaism.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Brock McNuggets@brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Tue Mar 17 22:38:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Mar 17, 2026 at 3:04:26 PM MST, "RonB" wrote <slrn10rjjv9.2oks.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>:

    On 2026-03-17, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 05:55:51 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    Zorin looks more like Windows, but it's based on Gnome (which I don't
    like it.) For example, if I want to get of window tiling, you have to
    install the "gnome extensions manager." Why couldn't they just include
    it in the standard install?

    https://zorin.com/os/pro/

    For $48 you can pick your poison. I assume you could create any of those
    with GNOME extensions if you knew what you were doing. I didn't realize
    Ubuntu does some tweaking until I ran Leap 16 GNOME, which I think is
    plain vanilla. I didn't try doing anything with it, just blew away the VM >> and did the KDE install.

    I like Cinnamon, but if I had to choose between Gnome or KDE, I would take KDE. Gnome seems to be in constant flux. They don't seem to be able to
    settle on anything for very long.

    Have not used it in a long time, but not only was in in flux, they could not get one part to match anther. It was like a bunch of things just tossed together.
    --
    It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Tue Mar 17 21:01:58 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-03-17 6:04 p.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-17, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 05:55:51 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    Zorin looks more like Windows, but it's based on Gnome (which I don't
    like it.) For example, if I want to get of window tiling, you have to
    install the "gnome extensions manager." Why couldn't they just include
    it in the standard install?

    https://zorin.com/os/pro/

    For $48 you can pick your poison. I assume you could create any of those
    with GNOME extensions if you knew what you were doing. I didn't realize
    Ubuntu does some tweaking until I ran Leap 16 GNOME, which I think is
    plain vanilla. I didn't try doing anything with it, just blew away the VM >> and did the KDE install.

    I like Cinnamon, but if I had to choose between Gnome or KDE, I would take KDE. Gnome seems to be in constant flux. They don't seem to be able to
    settle on anything for very long.

    Mind you, that is true of Rust, of Wayland and of Gnome. It's part of
    what frustrated me about using Linux. In many cases, the flux results in significant improvements, but things _will_ break along the way and the
    people responsible for the breakage won't care.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    Islam is poison, leftism is retardation.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From rbowman@bowman@montana.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Wed Mar 18 02:41:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 22:04:26 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    I like Cinnamon, but if I had to choose between Gnome or KDE, I would
    take KDE. Gnome seems to be in constant flux. They don't seem to be able
    to settle on anything for very long.

    I follow Lunduke on X although I usually don't watch his videos. Today's rant:

    The GNOME Desktop Environment has made some truly bizarre moves over the
    last few years.

    Technical, marketing, and management. Just pure insanity.
    - Restricting to only SystemD based systems.
    - Restricting to only Wayland based systems.
    - Hiring a “shaman” to be their Executive Director.
    - Making an official “Mention Lunduke and you’re banned for life” policy. - Harboring and defending registered sex offenders.
    - Force installing Trans Pride propaganda and artwork on users computer.
    - Attacking Jews, on their official website, as “leeches” and “baby killers”.
    - Official spokespersons defacing wiki pages of other projects with “wrong” political views.
    One horrific decision, and action, after another from the most widely used Linux Desktop Environment.





    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Wed Mar 18 08:04:38 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-17 6:04 p.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-17, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 05:55:51 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    Zorin looks more like Windows, but it's based on Gnome (which I don't
    like it.) For example, if I want to get of window tiling, you have to
    install the "gnome extensions manager." Why couldn't they just include >>>> it in the standard install?

    https://zorin.com/os/pro/

    For $48 you can pick your poison. I assume you could create any of those >>> with GNOME extensions if you knew what you were doing. I didn't realize
    Ubuntu does some tweaking until I ran Leap 16 GNOME, which I think is
    plain vanilla. I didn't try doing anything with it, just blew away the VM >>> and did the KDE install.

    I like Cinnamon, but if I had to choose between Gnome or KDE, I would take >> KDE. Gnome seems to be in constant flux. They don't seem to be able to
    settle on anything for very long.

    Mind you, that is true of Rust, of Wayland and of Gnome. It's part of
    what frustrated me about using Linux. In many cases, the flux results in significant improvements, but things _will_ break along the way and the people responsible for the breakage won't care.

    I installed Debian 13 and used for a few hours last night. Found some things that bothered me and I'm no longer enamored with Debian. For some reason,
    when I do any kind of search in Google, the computer just sits there for several seconds. I can count 1000-one, 1000-two... up to about ten seconds sometimes. I have no idea why. I thought maybe it had something to do with Firefox-ESR instead of regular Firefox, so I installed Firefox — which turned out to be a real pain in the butt. For some reason Debian doesn't
    want you to install Firefox, so they block it for "security" reasons.
    Mozilla has a detailed work-around, but I don't like Debian being control freaks. Then I tried to install the Microsoft core fonts, which I use in Firefox. Nope, that was also a non-starter. I haven't figured out how to bypass this yet. I found a .deb package (on Debian's own site) but it just sits there when I try to install it. Also, when I input my name and password when installing, it wouldn't let me use my normal short password. I HAD to
    put in a long password to install it. (Easy to change after the
    installation, but it still pissed me off.) I don't know what else doesn't
    work but I'll probably find another distribution that uses KDE Plasma
    because I would like to explore that desktop a little more. I'm not
    impressed with Debian's limitations so I won't be keeping it.
    --
    Not all Jews are Zionists. Not all Zionists are Jews. Zionism ≠ Judaism.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Wed Mar 18 08:08:56 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-03-18, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 22:04:26 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    I like Cinnamon, but if I had to choose between Gnome or KDE, I would
    take KDE. Gnome seems to be in constant flux. They don't seem to be able
    to settle on anything for very long.

    I follow Lunduke on X although I usually don't watch his videos. Today's rant:

    The GNOME Desktop Environment has made some truly bizarre moves over the last few years.

    Technical, marketing, and management. Just pure insanity.
    - Restricting to only SystemD based systems.
    - Restricting to only Wayland based systems.
    - Hiring a “shaman” to be their Executive Director.
    - Making an official “Mention Lunduke and you’re banned for life” policy.
    - Harboring and defending registered sex offenders.
    - Force installing Trans Pride propaganda and artwork on users computer.
    - Attacking Jews, on their official website, as “leeches” and “baby killers”.
    - Official spokespersons defacing wiki pages of other projects with “wrong” political views.
    One horrific decision, and action, after another from the most widely used Linux Desktop Environment.

    I think the Linux Mint team is more interested in making a good distribution then in promoting Woke crap. I know they use Gnome's libraries in Cinnamon, but Cinnamon is not Gnome.

    But I am looking at KDE Plasma again. (Linux Mint also has Mate and Xfce.)
    --
    Not all Jews are Zionists. Not all Zionists are Jews. Zionism ≠ Judaism.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Wed Mar 18 10:21:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-03-17 10:41 p.m., rbowman wrote:
    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 22:04:26 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    I like Cinnamon, but if I had to choose between Gnome or KDE, I would
    take KDE. Gnome seems to be in constant flux. They don't seem to be able
    to settle on anything for very long.

    I follow Lunduke on X although I usually don't watch his videos. Today's rant:

    The GNOME Desktop Environment has made some truly bizarre moves over the
    last few years.

    Technical, marketing, and management. Just pure insanity.
    - Restricting to only SystemD based systems.
    - Restricting to only Wayland based systems.
    - Hiring a “shaman” to be their Executive Director.
    - Making an official “Mention Lunduke and you’re banned for life” policy.
    - Harboring and defending registered sex offenders.
    - Force installing Trans Pride propaganda and artwork on users computer.
    - Attacking Jews, on their official website, as “leeches” and “baby killers”.
    - Official spokespersons defacing wiki pages of other projects with “wrong” political views.
    One horrific decision, and action, after another from the most widely used Linux Desktop Environment.

    I'll repeat what I wrote on Lunduke's Locals page here. This was in
    response to Debian having a vote for the _one_ female candidate who
    wants to lead the project and who happens to be anti-heterosexual and anti-male:

    "It's becoming pretty clear to me that the entire open-source community
    is against anything traditional, but especially against white Christian
    males. Add the fact that there are laws emerging to cap Linux at the
    knees and neutralize any kind of privacy benefit it might have offered,
    and there is no reason to disregard the shoddy code anymore. It is a
    fact that Windows and MacOS work better. It is also a fact that they
    support the hardware better. It is also a fact that it stands a better
    chance of running that program you rely on every day without issue.
    Clearly, the governments of the world want to destroy Linux as do the
    major technological corporations, but the faggots running the thing
    aren't doing themselves any favours either."
    --
    CrudeSausage
    Islam is poison
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Wed Mar 18 11:15:21 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-03-18 4:04 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-17 6:04 p.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-17, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 05:55:51 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    Zorin looks more like Windows, but it's based on Gnome (which I don't >>>>> like it.) For example, if I want to get of window tiling, you have to >>>>> install the "gnome extensions manager." Why couldn't they just include >>>>> it in the standard install?

    https://zorin.com/os/pro/

    For $48 you can pick your poison. I assume you could create any of those >>>> with GNOME extensions if you knew what you were doing. I didn't realize >>>> Ubuntu does some tweaking until I ran Leap 16 GNOME, which I think is
    plain vanilla. I didn't try doing anything with it, just blew away the VM >>>> and did the KDE install.

    I like Cinnamon, but if I had to choose between Gnome or KDE, I would take >>> KDE. Gnome seems to be in constant flux. They don't seem to be able to
    settle on anything for very long.

    Mind you, that is true of Rust, of Wayland and of Gnome. It's part of
    what frustrated me about using Linux. In many cases, the flux results in
    significant improvements, but things _will_ break along the way and the
    people responsible for the breakage won't care.

    I installed Debian 13 and used for a few hours last night. Found some things that bothered me and I'm no longer enamored with Debian. For some reason, when I do any kind of search in Google, the computer just sits there for several seconds. I can count 1000-one, 1000-two... up to about ten seconds sometimes. I have no idea why. I thought maybe it had something to do with Firefox-ESR instead of regular Firefox, so I installed Firefox — which turned out to be a real pain in the butt. For some reason Debian doesn't
    want you to install Firefox, so they block it for "security" reasons.
    Mozilla has a detailed work-around, but I don't like Debian being control freaks. Then I tried to install the Microsoft core fonts, which I use in Firefox. Nope, that was also a non-starter. I haven't figured out how to bypass this yet. I found a .deb package (on Debian's own site) but it just sits there when I try to install it. Also, when I input my name and password when installing, it wouldn't let me use my normal short password. I HAD to put in a long password to install it. (Easy to change after the
    installation, but it still pissed me off.) I don't know what else doesn't work but I'll probably find another distribution that uses KDE Plasma
    because I would like to explore that desktop a little more. I'm not
    impressed with Debian's limitations so I won't be keeping it.

    A lot of Linux users have resigned themselves to the idea that it
    doesn't matter which distribution you use, they're all the same in the
    end. That's probably why even the advanced users are sticking to Mint.
    Why anyone would increase the amount of headaches they have by
    installing Debian is beyond me.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    Islam is poison
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From pothead@pothead@snakebite.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Wed Mar 18 17:30:30 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-03-18, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 2026-03-18, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 22:04:26 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    I like Cinnamon, but if I had to choose between Gnome or KDE, I would
    take KDE. Gnome seems to be in constant flux. They don't seem to be able >>> to settle on anything for very long.

    I follow Lunduke on X although I usually don't watch his videos. Today's >> rant:

    The GNOME Desktop Environment has made some truly bizarre moves over the
    last few years.

    Technical, marketing, and management. Just pure insanity.
    - Restricting to only SystemD based systems.
    - Restricting to only Wayland based systems.
    - Hiring a “shaman” to be their Executive Director.
    - Making an official “Mention Lunduke and you’re banned for life” policy.
    - Harboring and defending registered sex offenders.
    - Force installing Trans Pride propaganda and artwork on users computer.
    - Attacking Jews, on their official website, as “leeches” and “baby >> killers”.
    - Official spokespersons defacing wiki pages of other projects with
    “wrong” political views.
    One horrific decision, and action, after another from the most widely used >> Linux Desktop Environment.

    I think the Linux Mint team is more interested in making a good distribution then in promoting Woke crap. I know they use Gnome's libraries in Cinnamon, but Cinnamon is not Gnome.

    But I am looking at KDE Plasma again. (Linux Mint also has Mate and Xfce.)


    This is what I am running.

    System:
    Kernel: 6.17.0-19-generic arch: x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 13.3.0 clocksource: tsc
    Desktop: Cinnamon v: 6.6.7 tk: GTK v: 3.24.41 wm: Muffin v: 6.6.3 vt: 7 dm: LightDM v: 1.30.0
    Distro: Linux Mint 22.3 Zena base: Ubuntu 24.04 noble
    --

    pothead

    "How many liberals does it take to change a light bulb?
    None, they’re too busy changing their gender."

    "What’s the hardest part about being a Liberal?
    Telling your gender neutral parental units that you’re straight."
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Thu Mar 19 08:36:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-17 10:41 p.m., rbowman wrote:
    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 22:04:26 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    I like Cinnamon, but if I had to choose between Gnome or KDE, I would
    take KDE. Gnome seems to be in constant flux. They don't seem to be able >>> to settle on anything for very long.

    I follow Lunduke on X although I usually don't watch his videos. Today's
    rant:

    The GNOME Desktop Environment has made some truly bizarre moves over the
    last few years.

    Technical, marketing, and management. Just pure insanity.
    - Restricting to only SystemD based systems.
    - Restricting to only Wayland based systems.
    - Hiring a “shaman” to be their Executive Director.
    - Making an official “Mention Lunduke and you’re banned for life” policy.
    - Harboring and defending registered sex offenders.
    - Force installing Trans Pride propaganda and artwork on users computer.
    - Attacking Jews, on their official website, as “leeches” and “baby
    killers”.
    - Official spokespersons defacing wiki pages of other projects with
    “wrong” political views.
    One horrific decision, and action, after another from the most widely used >> Linux Desktop Environment.

    I'll repeat what I wrote on Lunduke's Locals page here. This was in
    response to Debian having a vote for the _one_ female candidate who
    wants to lead the project and who happens to be anti-heterosexual and anti-male:

    "It's becoming pretty clear to me that the entire open-source community
    is against anything traditional, but especially against white Christian males. Add the fact that there are laws emerging to cap Linux at the
    knees and neutralize any kind of privacy benefit it might have offered,
    and there is no reason to disregard the shoddy code anymore. It is a
    fact that Windows and MacOS work better. It is also a fact that they
    support the hardware better. It is also a fact that it stands a better chance of running that program you rely on every day without issue.
    Clearly, the governments of the world want to destroy Linux as do the
    major technological corporations, but the faggots running the thing
    aren't doing themselves any favours either."

    Pretty much agree on Debian's stupid Woke politics. Don't agree that Mac OS and (especially) Windows "work better."
    --
    Not all Jews are Zionists. Not all Zionists are Jews. Zionism ≠ Judaism.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Thu Mar 19 08:40:18 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-18 4:04 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-17 6:04 p.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-17, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 05:55:51 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    Zorin looks more like Windows, but it's based on Gnome (which I don't >>>>>> like it.) For example, if I want to get of window tiling, you have to >>>>>> install the "gnome extensions manager." Why couldn't they just include >>>>>> it in the standard install?

    https://zorin.com/os/pro/

    For $48 you can pick your poison. I assume you could create any of those >>>>> with GNOME extensions if you knew what you were doing. I didn't realize >>>>> Ubuntu does some tweaking until I ran Leap 16 GNOME, which I think is >>>>> plain vanilla. I didn't try doing anything with it, just blew away the VM
    and did the KDE install.

    I like Cinnamon, but if I had to choose between Gnome or KDE, I would take >>>> KDE. Gnome seems to be in constant flux. They don't seem to be able to >>>> settle on anything for very long.

    Mind you, that is true of Rust, of Wayland and of Gnome. It's part of
    what frustrated me about using Linux. In many cases, the flux results in >>> significant improvements, but things _will_ break along the way and the
    people responsible for the breakage won't care.

    I installed Debian 13 and used for a few hours last night. Found some things >> that bothered me and I'm no longer enamored with Debian. For some reason,
    when I do any kind of search in Google, the computer just sits there for
    several seconds. I can count 1000-one, 1000-two... up to about ten seconds >> sometimes. I have no idea why. I thought maybe it had something to do with >> Firefox-ESR instead of regular Firefox, so I installed Firefox — which
    turned out to be a real pain in the butt. For some reason Debian doesn't
    want you to install Firefox, so they block it for "security" reasons.
    Mozilla has a detailed work-around, but I don't like Debian being control
    freaks. Then I tried to install the Microsoft core fonts, which I use in
    Firefox. Nope, that was also a non-starter. I haven't figured out how to
    bypass this yet. I found a .deb package (on Debian's own site) but it just >> sits there when I try to install it. Also, when I input my name and password >> when installing, it wouldn't let me use my normal short password. I HAD to >> put in a long password to install it. (Easy to change after the
    installation, but it still pissed me off.) I don't know what else doesn't
    work but I'll probably find another distribution that uses KDE Plasma
    because I would like to explore that desktop a little more. I'm not
    impressed with Debian's limitations so I won't be keeping it.

    A lot of Linux users have resigned themselves to the idea that it
    doesn't matter which distribution you use, they're all the same in the
    end. That's probably why even the advanced users are sticking to Mint.
    Why anyone would increase the amount of headaches they have by
    installing Debian is beyond me.

    To me they don't work the same. Linux Mint (for me) just seems to be the
    most stable and polished distribution I've used. I think too many distributions are too concerned with "eye candy" instead of a stable, clean desktop OS.

    I'm going to find something else to put on the computer that currently has Debian 13 KDE. There's too much of the "we know better what you need than
    you do" baked in. It rankles me.
    --
    Not all Jews are Zionists. Not all Zionists are Jews. Zionism ≠ Judaism.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Thu Mar 19 08:49:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-03-18, pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
    On 2026-03-18, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 2026-03-18, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 22:04:26 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    I like Cinnamon, but if I had to choose between Gnome or KDE, I would
    take KDE. Gnome seems to be in constant flux. They don't seem to be able >>>> to settle on anything for very long.

    I follow Lunduke on X although I usually don't watch his videos. Today's >>> rant:

    The GNOME Desktop Environment has made some truly bizarre moves over the >>> last few years.

    Technical, marketing, and management. Just pure insanity.
    - Restricting to only SystemD based systems.
    - Restricting to only Wayland based systems.
    - Hiring a “shaman” to be their Executive Director.
    - Making an official “Mention Lunduke and you’re banned for life” policy.
    - Harboring and defending registered sex offenders.
    - Force installing Trans Pride propaganda and artwork on users computer. >>> - Attacking Jews, on their official website, as “leeches” and “baby >>> killers”.
    - Official spokespersons defacing wiki pages of other projects with
    “wrong” political views.
    One horrific decision, and action, after another from the most widely used >>> Linux Desktop Environment.

    I think the Linux Mint team is more interested in making a good distribution
    then in promoting Woke crap. I know they use Gnome's libraries in Cinnamon, >> but Cinnamon is not Gnome.

    But I am looking at KDE Plasma again. (Linux Mint also has Mate and Xfce.) >>

    This is what I am running.

    System:
    Kernel: 6.17.0-19-generic arch: x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 13.3.0 clocksource: tsc
    Desktop: Cinnamon v: 6.6.7 tk: GTK v: 3.24.41 wm: Muffin v: 6.6.3 vt: 7 dm: LightDM v: 1.30.0
    Distro: Linux Mint 22.3 Zena base: Ubuntu 24.04 noble

    I almost exclusively work on Linux Mint computers, but I like to try other distributions — mostly to see if Trelby will install on them. None of them are better than Linux Mint (in my opinion).

    This is what's on my main computer (the one I'm currently using)...

    System:
    Host: 3020m Kernel: 5.15.0-173-generic x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc
    v: 11.4.0 Desktop: Cinnamon 6.0.4 Distro: Linux Mint 21.3 Virginia
    base: Ubuntu 22.04 jammy
    Display: x11 server: X.Org v: 1.21.1.4 driver: X: loaded: modesetting
    unloaded: fbdev,vesa gpu: i915 resolution: 1920x1080~60Hz

    I've got 22.x on other computer partitions. (None running 22.3 yet. No hurry to upgrade to it.)
    --
    Not all Jews are Zionists. Not all Zionists are Jews. Zionism ≠ Judaism.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Thu Mar 19 13:40:31 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-03-19 4:40 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-18 4:04 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-17 6:04 p.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-17, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 05:55:51 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    Zorin looks more like Windows, but it's based on Gnome (which I don't >>>>>>> like it.) For example, if I want to get of window tiling, you have to >>>>>>> install the "gnome extensions manager." Why couldn't they just include >>>>>>> it in the standard install?

    https://zorin.com/os/pro/

    For $48 you can pick your poison. I assume you could create any of those >>>>>> with GNOME extensions if you knew what you were doing. I didn't realize >>>>>> Ubuntu does some tweaking until I ran Leap 16 GNOME, which I think is >>>>>> plain vanilla. I didn't try doing anything with it, just blew away the VM
    and did the KDE install.

    I like Cinnamon, but if I had to choose between Gnome or KDE, I would take
    KDE. Gnome seems to be in constant flux. They don't seem to be able to >>>>> settle on anything for very long.

    Mind you, that is true of Rust, of Wayland and of Gnome. It's part of
    what frustrated me about using Linux. In many cases, the flux results in >>>> significant improvements, but things _will_ break along the way and the >>>> people responsible for the breakage won't care.

    I installed Debian 13 and used for a few hours last night. Found some things
    that bothered me and I'm no longer enamored with Debian. For some reason, >>> when I do any kind of search in Google, the computer just sits there for >>> several seconds. I can count 1000-one, 1000-two... up to about ten seconds >>> sometimes. I have no idea why. I thought maybe it had something to do with >>> Firefox-ESR instead of regular Firefox, so I installed Firefox — which >>> turned out to be a real pain in the butt. For some reason Debian doesn't >>> want you to install Firefox, so they block it for "security" reasons.
    Mozilla has a detailed work-around, but I don't like Debian being control >>> freaks. Then I tried to install the Microsoft core fonts, which I use in >>> Firefox. Nope, that was also a non-starter. I haven't figured out how to >>> bypass this yet. I found a .deb package (on Debian's own site) but it just >>> sits there when I try to install it. Also, when I input my name and password
    when installing, it wouldn't let me use my normal short password. I HAD to >>> put in a long password to install it. (Easy to change after the
    installation, but it still pissed me off.) I don't know what else doesn't >>> work but I'll probably find another distribution that uses KDE Plasma
    because I would like to explore that desktop a little more. I'm not
    impressed with Debian's limitations so I won't be keeping it.

    A lot of Linux users have resigned themselves to the idea that it
    doesn't matter which distribution you use, they're all the same in the
    end. That's probably why even the advanced users are sticking to Mint.
    Why anyone would increase the amount of headaches they have by
    installing Debian is beyond me.

    To me they don't work the same. Linux Mint (for me) just seems to be the
    most stable and polished distribution I've used. I think too many distributions are too concerned with "eye candy" instead of a stable, clean desktop OS.

    Agreed. KDE gives that impression, but then it ends up working pretty
    well. Nevertheless, it faces problems as a result of it using Wayland.
    The fact that Mint has been more conservative with Cinnamon and stuck to
    X results in it facing fewer issues.

    I'm going to find something else to put on the computer that currently has Debian 13 KDE. There's too much of the "we know better what you need than
    you do" baked in. It rankles me.

    The open-source community in general gives me that feeling. If Linux
    users themselves weren't so obnoxious and let the philosophy behind the
    system speak for itself, there is a good chance that more people would
    be willing to give it a try.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    Islam is poison, leftism is retardation.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Fri Mar 20 05:07:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-03-19, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-19 4:40 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-18 4:04 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-17 6:04 p.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-17, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 05:55:51 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    Zorin looks more like Windows, but it's based on Gnome (which I don't >>>>>>>> like it.) For example, if I want to get of window tiling, you have to >>>>>>>> install the "gnome extensions manager." Why couldn't they just include >>>>>>>> it in the standard install?

    https://zorin.com/os/pro/

    For $48 you can pick your poison. I assume you could create any of those
    with GNOME extensions if you knew what you were doing. I didn't realize >>>>>>> Ubuntu does some tweaking until I ran Leap 16 GNOME, which I think is >>>>>>> plain vanilla. I didn't try doing anything with it, just blew away the VM
    and did the KDE install.

    I like Cinnamon, but if I had to choose between Gnome or KDE, I would take
    KDE. Gnome seems to be in constant flux. They don't seem to be able to >>>>>> settle on anything for very long.

    Mind you, that is true of Rust, of Wayland and of Gnome. It's part of >>>>> what frustrated me about using Linux. In many cases, the flux results in >>>>> significant improvements, but things _will_ break along the way and the >>>>> people responsible for the breakage won't care.

    I installed Debian 13 and used for a few hours last night. Found some things
    that bothered me and I'm no longer enamored with Debian. For some reason, >>>> when I do any kind of search in Google, the computer just sits there for >>>> several seconds. I can count 1000-one, 1000-two... up to about ten seconds >>>> sometimes. I have no idea why. I thought maybe it had something to do with >>>> Firefox-ESR instead of regular Firefox, so I installed Firefox — which >>>> turned out to be a real pain in the butt. For some reason Debian doesn't >>>> want you to install Firefox, so they block it for "security" reasons.
    Mozilla has a detailed work-around, but I don't like Debian being control >>>> freaks. Then I tried to install the Microsoft core fonts, which I use in >>>> Firefox. Nope, that was also a non-starter. I haven't figured out how to >>>> bypass this yet. I found a .deb package (on Debian's own site) but it just >>>> sits there when I try to install it. Also, when I input my name and password
    when installing, it wouldn't let me use my normal short password. I HAD to >>>> put in a long password to install it. (Easy to change after the
    installation, but it still pissed me off.) I don't know what else doesn't >>>> work but I'll probably find another distribution that uses KDE Plasma
    because I would like to explore that desktop a little more. I'm not
    impressed with Debian's limitations so I won't be keeping it.

    A lot of Linux users have resigned themselves to the idea that it
    doesn't matter which distribution you use, they're all the same in the
    end. That's probably why even the advanced users are sticking to Mint.
    Why anyone would increase the amount of headaches they have by
    installing Debian is beyond me.

    To me they don't work the same. Linux Mint (for me) just seems to be the
    most stable and polished distribution I've used. I think too many
    distributions are too concerned with "eye candy" instead of a stable, clean >> desktop OS.

    Agreed. KDE gives that impression, but then it ends up working pretty
    well. Nevertheless, it faces problems as a result of it using Wayland.
    The fact that Mint has been more conservative with Cinnamon and stuck to
    X results in it facing fewer issues.

    I'm going to find something else to put on the computer that currently has >> Debian 13 KDE. There's too much of the "we know better what you need than
    you do" baked in. It rankles me.

    The open-source community in general gives me that feeling. If Linux
    users themselves weren't so obnoxious and let the philosophy behind the system speak for itself, there is a good chance that more people would
    be willing to give it a try.

    I never got that feeling with Linux Mint. I remember when Gnome 3 first came out, they kind of had the "we know what's better for you than you do" attitude. It looks Debian has inherited that delusional superiority complex.
    --
    Not all Jews are Zionists. Not all Zionists are Jews. Zionism ≠ Judaism.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Fri Mar 20 08:53:55 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-03-20 1:07 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-19, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-19 4:40 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-18 4:04 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-17 6:04 p.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-17, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 05:55:51 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    Zorin looks more like Windows, but it's based on Gnome (which I don't >>>>>>>>> like it.) For example, if I want to get of window tiling, you have to >>>>>>>>> install the "gnome extensions manager." Why couldn't they just include
    it in the standard install?

    https://zorin.com/os/pro/

    For $48 you can pick your poison. I assume you could create any of those
    with GNOME extensions if you knew what you were doing. I didn't realize
    Ubuntu does some tweaking until I ran Leap 16 GNOME, which I think is >>>>>>>> plain vanilla. I didn't try doing anything with it, just blew away the VM
    and did the KDE install.

    I like Cinnamon, but if I had to choose between Gnome or KDE, I would take
    KDE. Gnome seems to be in constant flux. They don't seem to be able to >>>>>>> settle on anything for very long.

    Mind you, that is true of Rust, of Wayland and of Gnome. It's part of >>>>>> what frustrated me about using Linux. In many cases, the flux results in >>>>>> significant improvements, but things _will_ break along the way and the >>>>>> people responsible for the breakage won't care.

    I installed Debian 13 and used for a few hours last night. Found some things
    that bothered me and I'm no longer enamored with Debian. For some reason, >>>>> when I do any kind of search in Google, the computer just sits there for >>>>> several seconds. I can count 1000-one, 1000-two... up to about ten seconds
    sometimes. I have no idea why. I thought maybe it had something to do with
    Firefox-ESR instead of regular Firefox, so I installed Firefox — which >>>>> turned out to be a real pain in the butt. For some reason Debian doesn't >>>>> want you to install Firefox, so they block it for "security" reasons. >>>>> Mozilla has a detailed work-around, but I don't like Debian being control >>>>> freaks. Then I tried to install the Microsoft core fonts, which I use in >>>>> Firefox. Nope, that was also a non-starter. I haven't figured out how to >>>>> bypass this yet. I found a .deb package (on Debian's own site) but it just
    sits there when I try to install it. Also, when I input my name and password
    when installing, it wouldn't let me use my normal short password. I HAD to
    put in a long password to install it. (Easy to change after the
    installation, but it still pissed me off.) I don't know what else doesn't >>>>> work but I'll probably find another distribution that uses KDE Plasma >>>>> because I would like to explore that desktop a little more. I'm not
    impressed with Debian's limitations so I won't be keeping it.

    A lot of Linux users have resigned themselves to the idea that it
    doesn't matter which distribution you use, they're all the same in the >>>> end. That's probably why even the advanced users are sticking to Mint. >>>> Why anyone would increase the amount of headaches they have by
    installing Debian is beyond me.

    To me they don't work the same. Linux Mint (for me) just seems to be the >>> most stable and polished distribution I've used. I think too many
    distributions are too concerned with "eye candy" instead of a stable, clean >>> desktop OS.

    Agreed. KDE gives that impression, but then it ends up working pretty
    well. Nevertheless, it faces problems as a result of it using Wayland.
    The fact that Mint has been more conservative with Cinnamon and stuck to
    X results in it facing fewer issues.

    I'm going to find something else to put on the computer that currently has >>> Debian 13 KDE. There's too much of the "we know better what you need than >>> you do" baked in. It rankles me.

    The open-source community in general gives me that feeling. If Linux
    users themselves weren't so obnoxious and let the philosophy behind the
    system speak for itself, there is a good chance that more people would
    be willing to give it a try.

    I never got that feeling with Linux Mint. I remember when Gnome 3 first came out, they kind of had the "we know what's better for you than you do" attitude.

    I remember it. The hatred against Gnome 3 was so strong that I had no
    choice but to try it out. Admittedly, it wasn't too good at first. It
    didn't become bearable until Gnome 3.8 or so.

    It looks Debian has inherited that delusional superiority complex.

    That superiority complex is everywhere in the Linux community. We've all witnessed it over decades. Of course, Linux advocates are still a lot
    more tolerable than the Apple zealots. Windows advocates, funny enough,
    aren't die-hard enthusiasts of their choice of operating system.

    With Apple and Linux's advocates though, there is a great difference:
    Apple zealots have a reason to be so loyal to their choice of hardware
    company as it has delivered some truly innovative and revolutionary
    products throughout its existence; Linux advocates, in most cases, are
    just delusional about how great the system is. It's a good alternative,
    but it's definitely not on par with commercial choices.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    Islam is poison, leftism is retardation.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Sat Mar 21 02:15:29 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-03-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-20 1:07 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-19, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-19 4:40 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-18 4:04 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-17 6:04 p.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-17, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 05:55:51 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    Zorin looks more like Windows, but it's based on Gnome (which I don't
    like it.) For example, if I want to get of window tiling, you have to
    install the "gnome extensions manager." Why couldn't they just include
    it in the standard install?

    https://zorin.com/os/pro/

    For $48 you can pick your poison. I assume you could create any of those
    with GNOME extensions if you knew what you were doing. I didn't realize
    Ubuntu does some tweaking until I ran Leap 16 GNOME, which I think is >>>>>>>>> plain vanilla. I didn't try doing anything with it, just blew away the VM
    and did the KDE install.

    I like Cinnamon, but if I had to choose between Gnome or KDE, I would take
    KDE. Gnome seems to be in constant flux. They don't seem to be able to >>>>>>>> settle on anything for very long.

    Mind you, that is true of Rust, of Wayland and of Gnome. It's part of >>>>>>> what frustrated me about using Linux. In many cases, the flux results in
    significant improvements, but things _will_ break along the way and the >>>>>>> people responsible for the breakage won't care.

    I installed Debian 13 and used for a few hours last night. Found some things
    that bothered me and I'm no longer enamored with Debian. For some reason,
    when I do any kind of search in Google, the computer just sits there for >>>>>> several seconds. I can count 1000-one, 1000-two... up to about ten seconds
    sometimes. I have no idea why. I thought maybe it had something to do with
    Firefox-ESR instead of regular Firefox, so I installed Firefox — which >>>>>> turned out to be a real pain in the butt. For some reason Debian doesn't >>>>>> want you to install Firefox, so they block it for "security" reasons. >>>>>> Mozilla has a detailed work-around, but I don't like Debian being control
    freaks. Then I tried to install the Microsoft core fonts, which I use in >>>>>> Firefox. Nope, that was also a non-starter. I haven't figured out how to >>>>>> bypass this yet. I found a .deb package (on Debian's own site) but it just
    sits there when I try to install it. Also, when I input my name and password
    when installing, it wouldn't let me use my normal short password. I HAD to
    put in a long password to install it. (Easy to change after the
    installation, but it still pissed me off.) I don't know what else doesn't
    work but I'll probably find another distribution that uses KDE Plasma >>>>>> because I would like to explore that desktop a little more. I'm not >>>>>> impressed with Debian's limitations so I won't be keeping it.

    A lot of Linux users have resigned themselves to the idea that it
    doesn't matter which distribution you use, they're all the same in the >>>>> end. That's probably why even the advanced users are sticking to Mint. >>>>> Why anyone would increase the amount of headaches they have by
    installing Debian is beyond me.

    To me they don't work the same. Linux Mint (for me) just seems to be the >>>> most stable and polished distribution I've used. I think too many
    distributions are too concerned with "eye candy" instead of a stable, clean
    desktop OS.

    Agreed. KDE gives that impression, but then it ends up working pretty
    well. Nevertheless, it faces problems as a result of it using Wayland.
    The fact that Mint has been more conservative with Cinnamon and stuck to >>> X results in it facing fewer issues.

    I'm going to find something else to put on the computer that currently has >>>> Debian 13 KDE. There's too much of the "we know better what you need than >>>> you do" baked in. It rankles me.

    The open-source community in general gives me that feeling. If Linux
    users themselves weren't so obnoxious and let the philosophy behind the
    system speak for itself, there is a good chance that more people would
    be willing to give it a try.

    I never got that feeling with Linux Mint. I remember when Gnome 3 first came >> out, they kind of had the "we know what's better for you than you do"
    attitude.

    I remember it. The hatred against Gnome 3 was so strong that I had no
    choice but to try it out. Admittedly, it wasn't too good at first. It
    didn't become bearable until Gnome 3.8 or so.

    I still don't think it's very good. It still needs extensions to make adjustments and do customizations. And these extensions are picky about when and where they'll work. At any rate, I moved away from the Gnome desktop a long time ago. I won't be going back.

    It looks Debian has inherited that delusional superiority complex.

    That superiority complex is everywhere in the Linux community. We've all witnessed it over decades. Of course, Linux advocates are still a lot
    more tolerable than the Apple zealots. Windows advocates, funny enough, aren't die-hard enthusiasts of their choice of operating system.

    I don't see much of it in the Linux Mint community. Maybe I don't go to the same websites you do. I do see some of this "exceptionalism" in the general (mostly Arch) Linux community, but it's easy to ignore and to (occasionally) counter. I chalk it up as "choice."

    With Apple and Linux's advocates though, there is a great difference:
    Apple zealots have a reason to be so loyal to their choice of hardware company as it has delivered some truly innovative and revolutionary
    products throughout its existence; Linux advocates, in most cases, are
    just delusional about how great the system is. It's a good alternative,
    but it's definitely not on par with commercial choices.

    I'm not delusional about my Linux experience. It just works for me (and has done so for twenty years). This is called experience, not delusion. I like
    the freedom to customize.

    As for Apple, I've tried to use their desktop. For me it just sucks. Zero customization. ("Want your windows controls on the right side?... Use
    Windows, you idiot, this is not the way we 'enlightened' do it.") Kind of cultish.

    As for Windows, it's no longer primarily an OS, it's an advertising platform that tries to push AI crap into whatever you want to do with it. If you're into gaming or are married to MicroSlop Office or Adobe's expensive rental crap, (or actually like AI crap) it's there for you. (Not there for me, though.)
    --
    Not all Jews are Zionists. Not all Zionists are Jews. Zionism ≠ Judaism.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Sat Mar 21 08:22:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-03-20 10:15 p.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-20 1:07 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-19, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-19 4:40 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-18 4:04 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-17 6:04 p.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-17, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 05:55:51 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    Zorin looks more like Windows, but it's based on Gnome (which I don't
    like it.) For example, if I want to get of window tiling, you have to
    install the "gnome extensions manager." Why couldn't they just include
    it in the standard install?

    https://zorin.com/os/pro/

    For $48 you can pick your poison. I assume you could create any of those
    with GNOME extensions if you knew what you were doing. I didn't realize
    Ubuntu does some tweaking until I ran Leap 16 GNOME, which I think is
    plain vanilla. I didn't try doing anything with it, just blew away the VM
    and did the KDE install.

    I like Cinnamon, but if I had to choose between Gnome or KDE, I would take
    KDE. Gnome seems to be in constant flux. They don't seem to be able to
    settle on anything for very long.

    Mind you, that is true of Rust, of Wayland and of Gnome. It's part of >>>>>>>> what frustrated me about using Linux. In many cases, the flux results in
    significant improvements, but things _will_ break along the way and the
    people responsible for the breakage won't care.

    I installed Debian 13 and used for a few hours last night. Found some things
    that bothered me and I'm no longer enamored with Debian. For some reason,
    when I do any kind of search in Google, the computer just sits there for
    several seconds. I can count 1000-one, 1000-two... up to about ten seconds
    sometimes. I have no idea why. I thought maybe it had something to do with
    Firefox-ESR instead of regular Firefox, so I installed Firefox — which
    turned out to be a real pain in the butt. For some reason Debian doesn't
    want you to install Firefox, so they block it for "security" reasons. >>>>>>> Mozilla has a detailed work-around, but I don't like Debian being control
    freaks. Then I tried to install the Microsoft core fonts, which I use in
    Firefox. Nope, that was also a non-starter. I haven't figured out how to
    bypass this yet. I found a .deb package (on Debian's own site) but it just
    sits there when I try to install it. Also, when I input my name and password
    when installing, it wouldn't let me use my normal short password. I HAD to
    put in a long password to install it. (Easy to change after the
    installation, but it still pissed me off.) I don't know what else doesn't
    work but I'll probably find another distribution that uses KDE Plasma >>>>>>> because I would like to explore that desktop a little more. I'm not >>>>>>> impressed with Debian's limitations so I won't be keeping it.

    A lot of Linux users have resigned themselves to the idea that it
    doesn't matter which distribution you use, they're all the same in the >>>>>> end. That's probably why even the advanced users are sticking to Mint. >>>>>> Why anyone would increase the amount of headaches they have by
    installing Debian is beyond me.

    To me they don't work the same. Linux Mint (for me) just seems to be the >>>>> most stable and polished distribution I've used. I think too many
    distributions are too concerned with "eye candy" instead of a stable, clean
    desktop OS.

    Agreed. KDE gives that impression, but then it ends up working pretty
    well. Nevertheless, it faces problems as a result of it using Wayland. >>>> The fact that Mint has been more conservative with Cinnamon and stuck to >>>> X results in it facing fewer issues.

    I'm going to find something else to put on the computer that currently has
    Debian 13 KDE. There's too much of the "we know better what you need than >>>>> you do" baked in. It rankles me.

    The open-source community in general gives me that feeling. If Linux
    users themselves weren't so obnoxious and let the philosophy behind the >>>> system speak for itself, there is a good chance that more people would >>>> be willing to give it a try.

    I never got that feeling with Linux Mint. I remember when Gnome 3 first came
    out, they kind of had the "we know what's better for you than you do"
    attitude.

    I remember it. The hatred against Gnome 3 was so strong that I had no
    choice but to try it out. Admittedly, it wasn't too good at first. It
    didn't become bearable until Gnome 3.8 or so.

    I still don't think it's very good. It still needs extensions to make adjustments and do customizations. And these extensions are picky about when and where they'll work. At any rate, I moved away from the Gnome desktop a long time ago. I won't be going back.

    Their wokeness is reason enough not to bother with them. Nevertheless,
    the extensions system in Gnome 3 is remarkably annoying. The default
    system doesn't usually do what anyone wants, so they have no choice but
    to get extensions. Once they have them, it's great until Gnome 3.46
    turns into 3.47 or so. When that happens, most of the extensions stop
    working, and you have to download them all over again. That's why Cosmic Desktop is so great: the functionality of the most popular extensions is
    built in.

    It looks Debian has inherited that delusional superiority complex.

    That superiority complex is everywhere in the Linux community. We've all
    witnessed it over decades. Of course, Linux advocates are still a lot
    more tolerable than the Apple zealots. Windows advocates, funny enough,
    aren't die-hard enthusiasts of their choice of operating system.

    I don't see much of it in the Linux Mint community. Maybe I don't go to the same websites you do. I do see some of this "exceptionalism" in the general (mostly Arch) Linux community, but it's easy to ignore and to (occasionally) counter. I chalk it up as "choice."

    You'd have to go to the forums. However, my limited experience in the
    Linux Mint forums is that the people there are level-headed and simply
    want to use Linux because it provides them some benefits over what
    they're used to, not because they think it's better. In every other
    forum, it seems like the only people posting are Larry Pietraskiewicz
    clones.

    With Apple and Linux's advocates though, there is a great difference:
    Apple zealots have a reason to be so loyal to their choice of hardware
    company as it has delivered some truly innovative and revolutionary
    products throughout its existence; Linux advocates, in most cases, are
    just delusional about how great the system is. It's a good alternative,
    but it's definitely not on par with commercial choices.

    I'm not delusional about my Linux experience. It just works for me (and has done so for twenty years). This is called experience, not delusion. I like the freedom to customize.

    As for Apple, I've tried to use their desktop. For me it just sucks. Zero customization. ("Want your windows controls on the right side?... Use Windows, you idiot, this is not the way we 'enlightened' do it.") Kind of cultish.

    As for Windows, it's no longer primarily an OS, it's an advertising platform that tries to push AI crap into whatever you want to do with it. If you're into gaming or are married to MicroSlop Office or Adobe's expensive rental crap, (or actually like AI crap) it's there for you. (Not there for me, though.)

    You're a level-headed human being with basic needs who doesn't mind that
    your hardware is old. For you, it's perfect as it should be. My needs
    are mostly basic too, but it seems that the fact that my hardware is
    usually suited for gaming is a problem for Linux. Either it has trouble
    with the powerful GPU, or it has trouble waking from sleep, or it has a problem with the extended functions like keys reserved for increasing
    the illumination of the screen or the keyboard. It mostly works, but
    there's always something. I don't hate Linux. I've been rooting for it
    since it first emerged. However, my experience has been that it hates
    _me_, and that has only gotten worse now with many of its developers
    treating my kind, Christian white men, as a parasite that needs to be eradicated.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    Islam is poison, leftism is retardation.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Sun Mar 22 06:06:47 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-03-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-20 10:15 p.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-20 1:07 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-19, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-19 4:40 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-18 4:04 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-17 6:04 p.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-17, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 05:55:51 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    Zorin looks more like Windows, but it's based on Gnome (which I don't
    like it.) For example, if I want to get of window tiling, you have to
    install the "gnome extensions manager." Why couldn't they just include
    it in the standard install?

    https://zorin.com/os/pro/

    For $48 you can pick your poison. I assume you could create any of those
    with GNOME extensions if you knew what you were doing. I didn't realize
    Ubuntu does some tweaking until I ran Leap 16 GNOME, which I think is
    plain vanilla. I didn't try doing anything with it, just blew away the VM
    and did the KDE install.

    I like Cinnamon, but if I had to choose between Gnome or KDE, I would take
    KDE. Gnome seems to be in constant flux. They don't seem to be able to
    settle on anything for very long.

    Mind you, that is true of Rust, of Wayland and of Gnome. It's part of >>>>>>>>> what frustrated me about using Linux. In many cases, the flux results in
    significant improvements, but things _will_ break along the way and the
    people responsible for the breakage won't care.

    I installed Debian 13 and used for a few hours last night. Found some things
    that bothered me and I'm no longer enamored with Debian. For some reason,
    when I do any kind of search in Google, the computer just sits there for
    several seconds. I can count 1000-one, 1000-two... up to about ten seconds
    sometimes. I have no idea why. I thought maybe it had something to do with
    Firefox-ESR instead of regular Firefox, so I installed Firefox — which
    turned out to be a real pain in the butt. For some reason Debian doesn't
    want you to install Firefox, so they block it for "security" reasons. >>>>>>>> Mozilla has a detailed work-around, but I don't like Debian being control
    freaks. Then I tried to install the Microsoft core fonts, which I use in
    Firefox. Nope, that was also a non-starter. I haven't figured out how to
    bypass this yet. I found a .deb package (on Debian's own site) but it just
    sits there when I try to install it. Also, when I input my name and password
    when installing, it wouldn't let me use my normal short password. I HAD to
    put in a long password to install it. (Easy to change after the >>>>>>>> installation, but it still pissed me off.) I don't know what else doesn't
    work but I'll probably find another distribution that uses KDE Plasma >>>>>>>> because I would like to explore that desktop a little more. I'm not >>>>>>>> impressed with Debian's limitations so I won't be keeping it.

    A lot of Linux users have resigned themselves to the idea that it >>>>>>> doesn't matter which distribution you use, they're all the same in the >>>>>>> end. That's probably why even the advanced users are sticking to Mint. >>>>>>> Why anyone would increase the amount of headaches they have by
    installing Debian is beyond me.

    To me they don't work the same. Linux Mint (for me) just seems to be the >>>>>> most stable and polished distribution I've used. I think too many
    distributions are too concerned with "eye candy" instead of a stable, clean
    desktop OS.

    Agreed. KDE gives that impression, but then it ends up working pretty >>>>> well. Nevertheless, it faces problems as a result of it using Wayland. >>>>> The fact that Mint has been more conservative with Cinnamon and stuck to >>>>> X results in it facing fewer issues.

    I'm going to find something else to put on the computer that currently has
    Debian 13 KDE. There's too much of the "we know better what you need than
    you do" baked in. It rankles me.

    The open-source community in general gives me that feeling. If Linux >>>>> users themselves weren't so obnoxious and let the philosophy behind the >>>>> system speak for itself, there is a good chance that more people would >>>>> be willing to give it a try.

    I never got that feeling with Linux Mint. I remember when Gnome 3 first came
    out, they kind of had the "we know what's better for you than you do"
    attitude.

    I remember it. The hatred against Gnome 3 was so strong that I had no
    choice but to try it out. Admittedly, it wasn't too good at first. It
    didn't become bearable until Gnome 3.8 or so.

    I still don't think it's very good. It still needs extensions to make
    adjustments and do customizations. And these extensions are picky about when >> and where they'll work. At any rate, I moved away from the Gnome desktop a >> long time ago. I won't be going back.

    Their wokeness is reason enough not to bother with them. Nevertheless,
    the extensions system in Gnome 3 is remarkably annoying. The default
    system doesn't usually do what anyone wants, so they have no choice but
    to get extensions. Once they have them, it's great until Gnome 3.46
    turns into 3.47 or so. When that happens, most of the extensions stop working, and you have to download them all over again. That's why Cosmic Desktop is so great: the functionality of the most popular extensions is built in.

    That's what I've run into (the few times I've tried Gnome 3). I'm always looking up "how do you change this?" — follow the link and find that particular extension, or no longer works with Gnome X.x. I really think the people who develop Gnome think everyone should use it EXACTLY as they use
    it. (Kind of the same mentality as you'll find with Mac OS.)

    It looks Debian has inherited that delusional superiority complex.

    That superiority complex is everywhere in the Linux community. We've all >>> witnessed it over decades. Of course, Linux advocates are still a lot
    more tolerable than the Apple zealots. Windows advocates, funny enough,
    aren't die-hard enthusiasts of their choice of operating system.

    I don't see much of it in the Linux Mint community. Maybe I don't go to the >> same websites you do. I do see some of this "exceptionalism" in the general >> (mostly Arch) Linux community, but it's easy to ignore and to (occasionally) >> counter. I chalk it up as "choice."

    You'd have to go to the forums. However, my limited experience in the
    Linux Mint forums is that the people there are level-headed and simply
    want to use Linux because it provides them some benefits over what
    they're used to, not because they think it's better. In every other
    forum, it seems like the only people posting are Larry Pietraskiewicz clones.

    I've run into that also, especially on Reddit (I haven't gone to many Linux forums except for Linux Mint's forum).

    With Apple and Linux's advocates though, there is a great difference:
    Apple zealots have a reason to be so loyal to their choice of hardware
    company as it has delivered some truly innovative and revolutionary
    products throughout its existence; Linux advocates, in most cases, are
    just delusional about how great the system is. It's a good alternative,
    but it's definitely not on par with commercial choices.

    I'm not delusional about my Linux experience. It just works for me (and has >> done so for twenty years). This is called experience, not delusion. I like >> the freedom to customize.

    As for Apple, I've tried to use their desktop. For me it just sucks. Zero
    customization. ("Want your windows controls on the right side?... Use
    Windows, you idiot, this is not the way we 'enlightened' do it.") Kind of
    cultish.

    As for Windows, it's no longer primarily an OS, it's an advertising platform >> that tries to push AI crap into whatever you want to do with it. If you're >> into gaming or are married to MicroSlop Office or Adobe's expensive rental >> crap, (or actually like AI crap) it's there for you. (Not there for me,
    though.)

    You're a level-headed human being with basic needs who doesn't mind that your hardware is old. For you, it's perfect as it should be. My needs
    are mostly basic too, but it seems that the fact that my hardware is
    usually suited for gaming is a problem for Linux. Either it has trouble
    with the powerful GPU, or it has trouble waking from sleep, or it has a problem with the extended functions like keys reserved for increasing
    the illumination of the screen or the keyboard. It mostly works, but
    there's always something. I don't hate Linux. I've been rooting for it
    since it first emerged. However, my experience has been that it hates
    _me_, and that has only gotten worse now with many of its developers treating my kind, Christian white men, as a parasite that needs to be eradicated.

    I understand. This is why when people ask about gaming on Linux Mint, I just let it pass. I simply don't know anything about it. Some people tell me
    Linux Mint can run games, some say not so much. I see no reason to insert my complete ignorance of gaming into the discussion.
    --
    Not all Jews are Zionists. Not all Zionists are Jews. Zionism ≠ Judaism.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Sun Mar 22 06:11:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-03-22, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 2026-03-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-20 10:15 p.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-20 1:07 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-19, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-19 4:40 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-18 4:04 a.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-18, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-17 6:04 p.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2026-03-17, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 05:55:51 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    Zorin looks more like Windows, but it's based on Gnome (which I don't
    like it.) For example, if I want to get of window tiling, you have to
    install the "gnome extensions manager." Why couldn't they just include
    it in the standard install?

    https://zorin.com/os/pro/

    For $48 you can pick your poison. I assume you could create any of those
    with GNOME extensions if you knew what you were doing. I didn't realize
    Ubuntu does some tweaking until I ran Leap 16 GNOME, which I think is
    plain vanilla. I didn't try doing anything with it, just blew away the VM
    and did the KDE install.

    I like Cinnamon, but if I had to choose between Gnome or KDE, I would take
    KDE. Gnome seems to be in constant flux. They don't seem to be able to
    settle on anything for very long.

    Mind you, that is true of Rust, of Wayland and of Gnome. It's part of
    what frustrated me about using Linux. In many cases, the flux results in
    significant improvements, but things _will_ break along the way and the
    people responsible for the breakage won't care.

    I installed Debian 13 and used for a few hours last night. Found some things
    that bothered me and I'm no longer enamored with Debian. For some reason,
    when I do any kind of search in Google, the computer just sits there for
    several seconds. I can count 1000-one, 1000-two... up to about ten seconds
    sometimes. I have no idea why. I thought maybe it had something to do with
    Firefox-ESR instead of regular Firefox, so I installed Firefox — which
    turned out to be a real pain in the butt. For some reason Debian doesn't
    want you to install Firefox, so they block it for "security" reasons. >>>>>>>>> Mozilla has a detailed work-around, but I don't like Debian being control
    freaks. Then I tried to install the Microsoft core fonts, which I use in
    Firefox. Nope, that was also a non-starter. I haven't figured out how to
    bypass this yet. I found a .deb package (on Debian's own site) but it just
    sits there when I try to install it. Also, when I input my name and password
    when installing, it wouldn't let me use my normal short password. I HAD to
    put in a long password to install it. (Easy to change after the >>>>>>>>> installation, but it still pissed me off.) I don't know what else doesn't
    work but I'll probably find another distribution that uses KDE Plasma >>>>>>>>> because I would like to explore that desktop a little more. I'm not >>>>>>>>> impressed with Debian's limitations so I won't be keeping it. >>>>>>>>
    A lot of Linux users have resigned themselves to the idea that it >>>>>>>> doesn't matter which distribution you use, they're all the same in the >>>>>>>> end. That's probably why even the advanced users are sticking to Mint. >>>>>>>> Why anyone would increase the amount of headaches they have by >>>>>>>> installing Debian is beyond me.

    To me they don't work the same. Linux Mint (for me) just seems to be the
    most stable and polished distribution I've used. I think too many >>>>>>> distributions are too concerned with "eye candy" instead of a stable, clean
    desktop OS.

    Agreed. KDE gives that impression, but then it ends up working pretty >>>>>> well. Nevertheless, it faces problems as a result of it using Wayland. >>>>>> The fact that Mint has been more conservative with Cinnamon and stuck to >>>>>> X results in it facing fewer issues.

    I'm going to find something else to put on the computer that currently has
    Debian 13 KDE. There's too much of the "we know better what you need than
    you do" baked in. It rankles me.

    The open-source community in general gives me that feeling. If Linux >>>>>> users themselves weren't so obnoxious and let the philosophy behind the >>>>>> system speak for itself, there is a good chance that more people would >>>>>> be willing to give it a try.

    I never got that feeling with Linux Mint. I remember when Gnome 3 first came
    out, they kind of had the "we know what's better for you than you do" >>>>> attitude.

    I remember it. The hatred against Gnome 3 was so strong that I had no
    choice but to try it out. Admittedly, it wasn't too good at first. It
    didn't become bearable until Gnome 3.8 or so.

    I still don't think it's very good. It still needs extensions to make
    adjustments and do customizations. And these extensions are picky about when
    and where they'll work. At any rate, I moved away from the Gnome desktop a >>> long time ago. I won't be going back.

    Their wokeness is reason enough not to bother with them. Nevertheless,
    the extensions system in Gnome 3 is remarkably annoying. The default
    system doesn't usually do what anyone wants, so they have no choice but
    to get extensions. Once they have them, it's great until Gnome 3.46
    turns into 3.47 or so. When that happens, most of the extensions stop
    working, and you have to download them all over again. That's why Cosmic
    Desktop is so great: the functionality of the most popular extensions is
    built in.

    That's what I've run into (the few times I've tried Gnome 3). I'm always looking up "how do you change this?" — follow the link and find that particular extension, or no longer works with Gnome X.x. I really think the people who develop Gnome think everyone should use it EXACTLY as they use it. (Kind of the same mentality as you'll find with Mac OS.)

    Or from the Woke in general.

    It looks Debian has inherited that delusional superiority complex.

    That superiority complex is everywhere in the Linux community. We've all >>>> witnessed it over decades. Of course, Linux advocates are still a lot
    more tolerable than the Apple zealots. Windows advocates, funny enough, >>>> aren't die-hard enthusiasts of their choice of operating system.

    I don't see much of it in the Linux Mint community. Maybe I don't go to the >>> same websites you do. I do see some of this "exceptionalism" in the general >>> (mostly Arch) Linux community, but it's easy to ignore and to (occasionally)
    counter. I chalk it up as "choice."

    You'd have to go to the forums. However, my limited experience in the
    Linux Mint forums is that the people there are level-headed and simply
    want to use Linux because it provides them some benefits over what
    they're used to, not because they think it's better. In every other
    forum, it seems like the only people posting are Larry Pietraskiewicz
    clones.

    I've run into that also, especially on Reddit (I haven't gone to many Linux forums except for Linux Mint's forum).

    With Apple and Linux's advocates though, there is a great difference:
    Apple zealots have a reason to be so loyal to their choice of hardware >>>> company as it has delivered some truly innovative and revolutionary
    products throughout its existence; Linux advocates, in most cases, are >>>> just delusional about how great the system is. It's a good alternative, >>>> but it's definitely not on par with commercial choices.

    I'm not delusional about my Linux experience. It just works for me (and has >>> done so for twenty years). This is called experience, not delusion. I like >>> the freedom to customize.

    As for Apple, I've tried to use their desktop. For me it just sucks. Zero >>> customization. ("Want your windows controls on the right side?... Use
    Windows, you idiot, this is not the way we 'enlightened' do it.") Kind of >>> cultish.

    As for Windows, it's no longer primarily an OS, it's an advertising platform
    that tries to push AI crap into whatever you want to do with it. If you're >>> into gaming or are married to MicroSlop Office or Adobe's expensive rental >>> crap, (or actually like AI crap) it's there for you. (Not there for me,
    though.)

    You're a level-headed human being with basic needs who doesn't mind that
    your hardware is old. For you, it's perfect as it should be. My needs
    are mostly basic too, but it seems that the fact that my hardware is
    usually suited for gaming is a problem for Linux. Either it has trouble
    with the powerful GPU, or it has trouble waking from sleep, or it has a
    problem with the extended functions like keys reserved for increasing
    the illumination of the screen or the keyboard. It mostly works, but
    there's always something. I don't hate Linux. I've been rooting for it
    since it first emerged. However, my experience has been that it hates
    _me_, and that has only gotten worse now with many of its developers
    treating my kind, Christian white men, as a parasite that needs to be
    eradicated.

    I understand. This is why when people ask about gaming on Linux Mint, I just let it pass. I simply don't know anything about it. Some people tell me Linux Mint can run games, some say not so much. I see no reason to insert my complete ignorance of gaming into the discussion.


    --
    Not all Jews are Zionists. Not all Zionists are Jews. Zionism ≠ Judaism.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From CrudeSausage@crude@sausa.ge to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Sun Mar 22 08:15:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-03-22 2:06 a.m., RonB wrote:

    < snipped for brevity >

    I still don't think it's very good. It still needs extensions to make
    adjustments and do customizations. And these extensions are picky about when
    and where they'll work. At any rate, I moved away from the Gnome desktop a >>> long time ago. I won't be going back.

    Their wokeness is reason enough not to bother with them. Nevertheless,
    the extensions system in Gnome 3 is remarkably annoying. The default
    system doesn't usually do what anyone wants, so they have no choice but
    to get extensions. Once they have them, it's great until Gnome 3.46
    turns into 3.47 or so. When that happens, most of the extensions stop
    working, and you have to download them all over again. That's why Cosmic
    Desktop is so great: the functionality of the most popular extensions is
    built in.

    That's what I've run into (the few times I've tried Gnome 3). I'm always looking up "how do you change this?" — follow the link and find that particular extension, or no longer works with Gnome X.x. I really think the people who develop Gnome think everyone should use it EXACTLY as they use
    it. (Kind of the same mentality as you'll find with Mac OS.)

    Mac is actually worse. I find it ridiculous that you need to go through
    the App Store to install a lot of things but that the same place will
    tell you that it can't install your app because your version of MacOS is
    too old. Apple zealots will lie to you and say that the Store will
    merely offer you an older version, but nothing in the settings allows
    for that. The message Apple sends you is to never reinstall your
    operating system because if you do, there is a high probability that you
    won't be able to reinstall the software you used. With Gnome, people
    can't really complain because the software is free as are the updates.

    It looks Debian has inherited that delusional superiority complex.

    That superiority complex is everywhere in the Linux community. We've all >>>> witnessed it over decades. Of course, Linux advocates are still a lot
    more tolerable than the Apple zealots. Windows advocates, funny enough, >>>> aren't die-hard enthusiasts of their choice of operating system.

    I don't see much of it in the Linux Mint community. Maybe I don't go to the >>> same websites you do. I do see some of this "exceptionalism" in the general >>> (mostly Arch) Linux community, but it's easy to ignore and to (occasionally)
    counter. I chalk it up as "choice."

    You'd have to go to the forums. However, my limited experience in the
    Linux Mint forums is that the people there are level-headed and simply
    want to use Linux because it provides them some benefits over what
    they're used to, not because they think it's better. In every other
    forum, it seems like the only people posting are Larry Pietraskiewicz
    clones.

    I've run into that also, especially on Reddit (I haven't gone to many Linux forums except for Linux Mint's forum).

    Reddit, in general, is a cesspool of left-wing cretins. If you deviate
    even slightly from the Communist position, they'll downvote you to
    oblivion and have you banned. Before then, you'll get messages asking
    you to reconsider suicide because with the left, they either want you to
    kill yourself or they joke about you wanting to do it. Obviously,
    someone dying is a joking matter to them, as it was with Charlie Kirk
    and the attempt on Trump's life. However, if sex traffickers and
    murderers are in your country illegally, you have to feel sorry for them
    and preserve their lives at all costs.

    You're a level-headed human being with basic needs who doesn't mind that
    your hardware is old. For you, it's perfect as it should be. My needs
    are mostly basic too, but it seems that the fact that my hardware is
    usually suited for gaming is a problem for Linux. Either it has trouble
    with the powerful GPU, or it has trouble waking from sleep, or it has a
    problem with the extended functions like keys reserved for increasing
    the illumination of the screen or the keyboard. It mostly works, but
    there's always something. I don't hate Linux. I've been rooting for it
    since it first emerged. However, my experience has been that it hates
    _me_, and that has only gotten worse now with many of its developers
    treating my kind, Christian white men, as a parasite that needs to be
    eradicated.

    I understand. This is why when people ask about gaming on Linux Mint, I just let it pass. I simply don't know anything about it. Some people tell me
    Linux Mint can run games, some say not so much. I see no reason to insert my complete ignorance of gaming into the discussion.

    I just brought it up because it seems to be the source of most of my
    problems.
    --
    CrudeSausage
    Islam is poison, leftism is retardation.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From rbowman@bowman@montana.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Sun Mar 22 17:52:17 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Sun, 22 Mar 2026 08:15:51 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:

    Reddit, in general, is a cesspool of left-wing cretins. If you deviate
    even slightly from the Communist position, they'll downvote you to
    oblivion and have you banned.

    That applies to the local subreddit since this is a bright blue spot in a
    red state but I haven't seen it on the tech subs. I bite my tongue on that
    one although I hope they froze their genitals off at yesterday's No Kings rally. Even the lefties are getting sick of those.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RonB@ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Mon Mar 23 11:10:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2026-03-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    On 2026-03-22 2:06 a.m., RonB wrote:

    < snipped for brevity >

    I still don't think it's very good. It still needs extensions to make
    adjustments and do customizations. And these extensions are picky about when
    and where they'll work. At any rate, I moved away from the Gnome desktop a >>>> long time ago. I won't be going back.

    Their wokeness is reason enough not to bother with them. Nevertheless,
    the extensions system in Gnome 3 is remarkably annoying. The default
    system doesn't usually do what anyone wants, so they have no choice but
    to get extensions. Once they have them, it's great until Gnome 3.46
    turns into 3.47 or so. When that happens, most of the extensions stop
    working, and you have to download them all over again. That's why Cosmic >>> Desktop is so great: the functionality of the most popular extensions is >>> built in.

    That's what I've run into (the few times I've tried Gnome 3). I'm always
    looking up "how do you change this?" — follow the link and find that
    particular extension, or no longer works with Gnome X.x. I really think the >> people who develop Gnome think everyone should use it EXACTLY as they use
    it. (Kind of the same mentality as you'll find with Mac OS.)

    Mac is actually worse. I find it ridiculous that you need to go through
    the App Store to install a lot of things but that the same place will
    tell you that it can't install your app because your version of MacOS is
    too old. Apple zealots will lie to you and say that the Store will
    merely offer you an older version, but nothing in the settings allows
    for that. The message Apple sends you is to never reinstall your
    operating system because if you do, there is a high probability that you won't be able to reinstall the software you used. With Gnome, people
    can't really complain because the software is free as are the updates.

    Can't argue with you. I don't like either, so that means I don't use either and really don't know that much about them.

    It looks Debian has inherited that delusional superiority complex.

    That superiority complex is everywhere in the Linux community. We've all >>>>> witnessed it over decades. Of course, Linux advocates are still a lot >>>>> more tolerable than the Apple zealots. Windows advocates, funny enough, >>>>> aren't die-hard enthusiasts of their choice of operating system.

    I don't see much of it in the Linux Mint community. Maybe I don't go to the
    same websites you do. I do see some of this "exceptionalism" in the general
    (mostly Arch) Linux community, but it's easy to ignore and to (occasionally)
    counter. I chalk it up as "choice."

    You'd have to go to the forums. However, my limited experience in the
    Linux Mint forums is that the people there are level-headed and simply
    want to use Linux because it provides them some benefits over what
    they're used to, not because they think it's better. In every other
    forum, it seems like the only people posting are Larry Pietraskiewicz
    clones.

    I've run into that also, especially on Reddit (I haven't gone to many Linux >> forums except for Linux Mint's forum).

    Reddit, in general, is a cesspool of left-wing cretins. If you deviate
    even slightly from the Communist position, they'll downvote you to
    oblivion and have you banned. Before then, you'll get messages asking
    you to reconsider suicide because with the left, they either want you to kill yourself or they joke about you wanting to do it. Obviously,
    someone dying is a joking matter to them, as it was with Charlie Kirk
    and the attempt on Trump's life. However, if sex traffickers and
    murderers are in your country illegally, you have to feel sorry for them
    and preserve their lives at all costs.

    I have a Trelby sub-Reddit on Reddit. And I follow a few other subjects,
    like pet rats, mechanical pencils, Linux Mnt, home networking... and a few more. I used to follow screenwriting, but that sub-Reddit is exremely Woke, with a lot of screeching "karen" control freaks — so I don't go there much any more.

    You're a level-headed human being with basic needs who doesn't mind that >>> your hardware is old. For you, it's perfect as it should be. My needs
    are mostly basic too, but it seems that the fact that my hardware is
    usually suited for gaming is a problem for Linux. Either it has trouble
    with the powerful GPU, or it has trouble waking from sleep, or it has a
    problem with the extended functions like keys reserved for increasing
    the illumination of the screen or the keyboard. It mostly works, but
    there's always something. I don't hate Linux. I've been rooting for it
    since it first emerged. However, my experience has been that it hates
    _me_, and that has only gotten worse now with many of its developers
    treating my kind, Christian white men, as a parasite that needs to be
    eradicated.

    I understand. This is why when people ask about gaming on Linux Mint, I just >> let it pass. I simply don't know anything about it. Some people tell me
    Linux Mint can run games, some say not so much. I see no reason to insert my >> complete ignorance of gaming into the discussion.

    I just brought it up because it seems to be the source of most of my problems.

    I understand.
    --
    Not all Jews are Zionists. Not all Zionists are Jews. Zionism ≠ Judaism.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2