He knows damn well I never had a copy of that obnoxious bot that was used
for his benefit - He continues to claim that the MIDs he shares support the fabricated story he took the time to write about me. As with the other MIDs he's sharing that are supposed to support his claims about me and you - he's full of shit. I suspect even he realizes it but he's committed and cannot admit he lied about any of it. He did, but, he's not a man capable of admitting that.
Now you go and find some old source code you don't understand and ask
for Snits advice concerning it? The idiot didn't even realize what
you were asking about and provided you no answer.
As far as snit bringing reciepts, hah, umm, no. Snit brings his own interpretation of what he thinks are receipts, and you continue to let him slide when he fucks up doing that. A very simple, but long ongoing example
of that is the floodbot story he wrote about me. His latest morph over what he's quoting me out of context is to label what I wrote as being proof of having insider knowledge. Anything to avoid admitting in public where he
made the accusation that he lied. That's how 'honest' your friend is, David Brooks.
Nor have I ever had a copy of the floodbot, either in source or compiled form.
MID: <68f30cf4$1$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
You will notice that Snit is making an effort to redirect followups in
an effort to keep people from learning exactly what he actually is.
It's plain to see in his own headers. This post is also a perfect
example of exactly what Snit means when he claims he brings receipts.
He's attempting to return items he didn't purchase from xx store using
yy store receipts and hopes that you are dumb enough to fall for it.
Brock McNuggets is Snit aka Michael Lee Glasser of Prescott Arizona.
From: Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Followup-To: alt.test
Subject: Re: Returning to the Dark Side
Date: 18 Oct 2025 03:43:48 GMT
Message-ID: <68f30cf4$1$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
On Oct 17, 2025 at 7:08:06 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB37BE12B16B86HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
He knows damn well I never had a copy of that obnoxious bot that was
used for his benefit - He continues to claim that the MIDs he shares
support the fabricated story he took the time to write about me. As
with the other MIDs he's sharing that are supposed to support his
claims about me and you - he's full of shit. I suspect even he
realizes it but he's committed and cannot admit he lied about any of
it. He did, but, he's not a man capable of admitting that.
I never claimed you had Carroll's flood bot code.
***
Snit's memory must be absolutely terrible. Here's the first post where
he accused me of having a copy either in source or compiled form. All
because he didn't like a reply I wrote for David Brooks. The reply was telling David that Snit was the wrong person to be asking for help
with my wallgreeter source code. David wanted to know how the backdoor worked. Snit couldn't figure it out on his own. Eventually he ran it
thru an AI and the AI did the 'heavy lifting' on behalf of
Snit aka Michael Lee Glasser of Prescott Arizona:
MID: <hhk7lhFue2dU2@mid.individual.net>
From: Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: Please note.
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 22:05:53 -0700
Message-ID: <hhk7lhFue2dU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <o2fsG.77364$fk3.33122@fx26.ams1>
<hheifoFogdjU1@mid.individual.net> <hoxsG.136803$Fx.134030@fx19.ams1>
<XnsABB76B32E964HT1@8P1PQ2e52.7r7wsG43c>
On 5/7/20 9:36 PM, Diesel wrote:
....
Now you go and find some old source code you don't understand and ask
for Snits advice concerning it? The idiot didn't even realize what
you were asking about and provided you no answer.
Ah, more trolling of me by you. So more reminding you of your past
nonsense.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Diesel
<XnsAB6D6F1BFA61HT1@3dOIZISX3.IwU6R1OH8iz29MMTN26bF08TPFtT157gyFB5>:
-----
Snit, if you're running the bot you have an easy way out
that won't cost you any respect, face, or anything else.
Just stop. That's it. Simple right?
-----
The last time the bot had posted was more than three hours before.
Diesel made it clear he could find the IP of the person running the
bot. And he made it clear it would be easy for him to make a
Sandman-like time table of posting, but showing Carroll and the bot
and myself.
Was he lying when he said that? Maybe. But I do not think so. And if
he was merely lying he would not have access to the program itself,
which he makes VERY clear he did.
Diesel and Carroll were trolling together. The bot goes silent. Diesel
then says if the bot is just turned off he will let it slide. Does
that sound like Diesel to you? And he also say this:
-----
It needs to be recoded anyway, it's a seriously piss poor
example of writing software.
-----
Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot
but to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was
merely the compiled code he had:
<XnsAB6E44E6AFE1AHT1@ZdS859K14.7p1JRyU90Zyd>
-----
Do you think when you disassemble something that you're
provided the original source code that was
compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're
given looks nothing like the original source code, but it
still tells you *everything* about the program.
-----
So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My
guess: he will NEVER say.
***
That's snit directly accusing me of having a copy of it.
The following is Snit accusing me of being the author of the floodbot:
MID: <686e0487$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
From: Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: How does this...
Organization: Southern Nevada Institute of Technology
Date: 09 Jul 2025 05:56:23 GMT
Message-ID: <686e0487$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
On Jul 8, 2025 at 10:27:38?PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB317EDC0EE0FHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
As far as snit bringing reciepts, hah, umm, no. Snit brings his own
interpretation of what he thinks are receipts, and you continue to
let him slide when he fucks up doing that. A very simple, but long
ongoing example of that is the floodbot story he wrote about me. His
latest morph over what he's quoting me out of context is to label
what I wrote as being proof of having insider knowledge. Anything to
avoid admitting in public where he made the accusation that he lied.
That's how 'honest' your friend is, David Brooks.
Oh good grief... are you still crying I *QUOTED* you?
Gremlin
<XnsAB6D6F1BFA61HT1@3dOIZISX3.IwU6R1OH8iz29MMTN26bF08TPFtT157gyFB5>:
-----
It needs to be recoded anyway, it's a seriously piss poor
example of writing software.
-----
Gremlin <XnsAB6E44E6AFE1AHT1@ZdS859K14.7p1JRyU90Zyd>
-----
Do you think when you disassemble something that you're
provided the original source code that was
compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're
given looks nothing like the original source code, but it
still tells you *everything* about the program.
-----
If you can understand what you read you will come to the same
conclusion as ChatGPT, which I shared the full posts with:
https://chatgpt.com/share/681ea0aa-d35c-800c-b586-185275735e26
-----
Gremlin repeatedly claims he hasn’t seen the source code
for Carroll’s flood bot—yet he calls it a “seriously piss
poor example of writing software” and boasts that
disassembly “tells you everything about the program.” So
either he’s seen the code or reverse-engineered it—meaning
he has examined it closely enough to know how it works. He
criticizes it like someone who’s dug into its inner
workings, but dances around admitting it outright. And for
someone who sometimes denies Carroll is behind the bot, he
sure acts like he knows a lot about it.
-----
You did as you do -- bragged. And then later you spoke of Carroll's
bot code being YOUR code:
Gremlin <XnsB30818362641CHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>
-----
He got pissed off over a reply I wrote to you and wrote
the floodbot story in response to that. He wrongly assumed
I was trolling him with my reply. You asked him to help
you with my source code.
-----
Did you have a stroke mid paragraph? Are you really saying the
floodbot is YOUR source code? YOURS?
***
This is Snit playing games again about the floodbot accusation:
MID: <67d7b494$1$14$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
From: Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: SNIT Lying about his criminal record. THE entire thread
with all in context. Date: 17 Mar 2025 05:35:16 GMT
Lines: 155
Message-ID: <67d7b494$1$14$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
On Mar 16, 2025 at 9:27:10?PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB2A549B2D02HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
Nor have I ever had a copy of the floodbot, either in source or
compiled form.
Are you mad Carroll refused to share it with you?
***
I hope this post shows everyone exactly what Snit is and his level of dedication to the lies he's written about individuals he has a problem
of any kind with. The following urls should answer any questions after reading all of this that may be lingering concerning him and what he's actually doing here.
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
On Oct 18, 2025 at 1:07:47 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB37CA41502416HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
MID: <68f30cf4$1$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
You will notice that Snit is making an effort to redirect followups
in an effort
to keep people from learning exactly what he actually is.
This is a lie. A quotable lie.
Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> wrote in
I hope this post shows everyone exactly what Snit is and his level of
dedication to the lies he's written about individuals he has a problem
of any kind with. The following urls should answer any questions after
reading all of this that may be lingering concerning him and what he's
actually doing here.
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
Floodbot?
What is that? I am not familiar with that accusation. From what I have
seen of snit's programming abilities I doubt he could manage to write a hello world program and get it to work.
So what is this floodbot thing?
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:68f3f687$5$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Oct 18, 2025 at 1:07:47 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB37CA41502416HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
MID: <68f30cf4$1$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
You will notice that Snit is making an effort to redirect followups
in an effort
to keep people from learning exactly what he actually is.
This is a lie. A quotable lie.
No it's not a lie snit.
The MID, and in fact this very message exposes your failed attempt at
hiding your trolling and trolling history.
so you have been at this troll circus thing for 30 years?
What the fuck is wrong with you snit?
That's a third of your life wasted.
Why?
By the way, your little trick of changing followups from alt.test to alt.text has failed.
There hasn't been a post in alt.text since 5/24.
You lose once aqain snit.
nobody <nobody2u@hotmail.org> news:XnsB37CAED391E79nobody2uhotmailorg@62.164.182.24 Sat, 18 Oct 2025 21:11:09 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:68f3f687$5$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Oct 18, 2025 at 1:07:47 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB37CA41502416HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
MID: <68f30cf4$1$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
You will notice that Snit is making an effort to redirect followups
in an effort to keep people from learning exactly what he actually
is.
This is a lie. A quotable lie.
No it's not a lie snit.
Nothing I've written about him is a lie.
The MID, and in fact this very message exposes your failed attempt at
hiding your trolling and trolling history.
Correct.
so you have been at this troll circus thing for 30 years?
What the fuck is wrong with you snit?
visit some of the urls included and you can read all about him.
He's well known as a troll. A true fuckhead troll.
That's a third of your life wasted.
Why?
By the way, your little trick of changing followups from alt.test to
alt.text has failed.
There hasn't been a post in alt.text since 5/24.
You lose once again snit.
Once he sets a good foot hold in COLA, they will be on the losing end.
He's a parasite. Some people will learn this the hard way as he works to destroy that newsgroup. He will eventually do the same things he did in alt.computer.workshop. If you visit alt.computer.workshop you can see
for yourself - the majority of the regulars will not interact with him anymore. That's why he's so keen on setting up shop in your newsgroup.
He's done so before but was eventually ran off. He's back for another
round because he's snowed several into responding to him.
your advice for others to ignore him and stay the fuck away is correct. Unfortunately, it doesn't take many to ignore your advice and engage
with him. Once done, you are stuck with him for a while - As in years.
He's like a german cockroach.
See here:
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/320HVQR4b90>
or here:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=snit+michael+glasser>
He is very well known. It's best not to feed him. Those who do will
regret it. Those who didn't will also begin to have a disdain for those
who did feed him. Any interaction good or bad is enough to keep him
around. You won't want him sticking around for the 2nd time. Don't take
my word for it though, read some posts in alt.computer.workshop. In the
event the one I posted about him isn't good enough. He will work hard to trash your newsgroup.
And he will trash it. He will single out those of you who have some
technical knowledge and skill. When you don't accept him as one of you (because he's a fucking tech moron) you'll regret it. Don't take my word
for it. See for yourself.
Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> wrote in news:XnsB37CA41502416HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5:
MID: <68f30cf4$1$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
You will notice that Snit is making an effort to redirect followups in
an effort to keep people from learning exactly what he actually is.
It's plain to see in his own headers. This post is also a perfect
example of exactly what Snit means when he claims he brings receipts.
He's attempting to return items he didn't purchase from xx store using
yy store receipts and hopes that you are dumb enough to fall for it.
Brock McNuggets is Snit aka Michael Lee Glasser of Prescott Arizona.
From: Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Followup-To: alt.test
Subject: Re: Returning to the Dark Side
Date: 18 Oct 2025 03:43:48 GMT
Message-ID: <68f30cf4$1$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
On Oct 17, 2025 at 7:08:06 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB37BE12B16B86HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
He knows damn well I never had a copy of that obnoxious bot that was
used for his benefit - He continues to claim that the MIDs he shares
support the fabricated story he took the time to write about me. As
with the other MIDs he's sharing that are supposed to support his
claims about me and you - he's full of shit. I suspect even he
realizes it but he's committed and cannot admit he lied about any of
it. He did, but, he's not a man capable of admitting that.
I never claimed you had Carroll's flood bot code.
***
Snit's memory must be absolutely terrible. Here's the first post where
he accused me of having a copy either in source or compiled form. All because he didn't like a reply I wrote for David Brooks. The reply was telling David that Snit was the wrong person to be asking for help
with my wallgreeter source code. David wanted to know how the backdoor worked. Snit couldn't figure it out on his own. Eventually he ran it
thru an AI and the AI did the 'heavy lifting' on behalf of
Snit aka Michael Lee Glasser of Prescott Arizona:
MID: <hhk7lhFue2dU2@mid.individual.net>
From: Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: Please note.
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 22:05:53 -0700
Message-ID: <hhk7lhFue2dU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <o2fsG.77364$fk3.33122@fx26.ams1>
<hheifoFogdjU1@mid.individual.net> <hoxsG.136803$Fx.134030@fx19.ams1>
<XnsABB76B32E964HT1@8P1PQ2e52.7r7wsG43c>
On 5/7/20 9:36 PM, Diesel wrote:
....
Now you go and find some old source code you don't understand and ask
for Snits advice concerning it? The idiot didn't even realize what
you were asking about and provided you no answer.
Ah, more trolling of me by you. So more reminding you of your past nonsense.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Diesel
<XnsAB6D6F1BFA61HT1@3dOIZISX3.IwU6R1OH8iz29MMTN26bF08TPFtT157gyFB5>:
-----
Snit, if you're running the bot you have an easy way out
that won't cost you any respect, face, or anything else.
Just stop. That's it. Simple right?
-----
The last time the bot had posted was more than three hours before.
Diesel made it clear he could find the IP of the person running the
bot. And he made it clear it would be easy for him to make a
Sandman-like time table of posting, but showing Carroll and the bot
and myself.
Was he lying when he said that? Maybe. But I do not think so. And if
he was merely lying he would not have access to the program itself,
which he makes VERY clear he did.
Diesel and Carroll were trolling together. The bot goes silent. Diesel
then says if the bot is just turned off he will let it slide. Does
that sound like Diesel to you? And he also say this:
-----
It needs to be recoded anyway, it's a seriously piss poor
example of writing software.
-----
Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot
but to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was
merely the compiled code he had:
<XnsAB6E44E6AFE1AHT1@ZdS859K14.7p1JRyU90Zyd>
-----
Do you think when you disassemble something that you're
provided the original source code that was
compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're
given looks nothing like the original source code, but it
still tells you *everything* about the program.
-----
So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My
guess: he will NEVER say.
***
That's snit directly accusing me of having a copy of it.
The following is Snit accusing me of being the author of the floodbot:
MID: <686e0487$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
From: Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: How does this...
Organization: Southern Nevada Institute of Technology
Date: 09 Jul 2025 05:56:23 GMT
Message-ID: <686e0487$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
On Jul 8, 2025 at 10:27:38?PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB317EDC0EE0FHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
As far as snit bringing reciepts, hah, umm, no. Snit brings his own
interpretation of what he thinks are receipts, and you continue to
let him slide when he fucks up doing that. A very simple, but long
ongoing example of that is the floodbot story he wrote about me. His
latest morph over what he's quoting me out of context is to label
what I wrote as being proof of having insider knowledge. Anything to
avoid admitting in public where he made the accusation that he lied.
That's how 'honest' your friend is, David Brooks.
Oh good grief... are you still crying I *QUOTED* you?
Gremlin <XnsAB6D6F1BFA61HT1@3dOIZISX3.IwU6R1OH8iz29MMTN26bF08TPFtT157gyFB5>:
-----
It needs to be recoded anyway, it's a seriously piss poor
example of writing software.
-----
Gremlin <XnsAB6E44E6AFE1AHT1@ZdS859K14.7p1JRyU90Zyd>
-----
Do you think when you disassemble something that you're
provided the original source code that was
compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're
given looks nothing like the original source code, but it
still tells you *everything* about the program.
-----
If you can understand what you read you will come to the same
conclusion as ChatGPT, which I shared the full posts with:
https://chatgpt.com/share/681ea0aa-d35c-800c-b586-185275735e26
-----
Gremlin repeatedly claims he hasnÂ’t seen the source code
for Carroll’s flood bot—yet he calls it a “seriously piss
poor example of writing software” and boasts that
disassembly “tells you everything about the program.” So
either he’s seen the code or reverse-engineered it—meaning
he has examined it closely enough to know how it works. He
criticizes it like someone whoÂ’s dug into its inner
workings, but dances around admitting it outright. And for
someone who sometimes denies Carroll is behind the bot, he
sure acts like he knows a lot about it.
-----
You did as you do -- bragged. And then later you spoke of Carroll's
bot code being YOUR code:
Gremlin <XnsB30818362641CHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>
-----
He got pissed off over a reply I wrote to you and wrote
the floodbot story in response to that. He wrongly assumed
I was trolling him with my reply. You asked him to help
you with my source code.
-----
Did you have a stroke mid paragraph? Are you really saying the
floodbot is YOUR source code? YOURS?
***
This is Snit playing games again about the floodbot accusation:
MID: <67d7b494$1$14$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
From: Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: SNIT Lying about his criminal record. THE entire thread
with all in context. Date: 17 Mar 2025 05:35:16 GMT
Lines: 155
Message-ID: <67d7b494$1$14$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
On Mar 16, 2025 at 9:27:10?PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB2A549B2D02HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
Nor have I ever had a copy of the floodbot, either in source or
compiled form.
Are you mad Carroll refused to share it with you?
***
I hope this post shows everyone exactly what Snit is and his level of dedication to the lies he's written about individuals he has a problem
of any kind with. The following urls should answer any questions after reading all of this that may be lingering concerning him and what he's actually doing here.
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
Floodbot?
What is that? I am not familiar with that accusation. From what I have
seen of snit's programming abilities I doubt he could manage to write a hello world program and get it to work.
// Header file for input output functions
#include <stdio.h>
// Main function: entry point for execution
int main() {
// Writing print statement to print hello world
printf("Hello World");
return 0;
}
On Sat, 18 Oct 2025 21:31:58 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin wrote:
nobody <nobody2u@hotmail.org>
news:XnsB37CAED391E79nobody2uhotmailorg@62.164.182.24 Sat, 18 Oct 2025
21:11:09 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:68f3f687$5$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Oct 18, 2025 at 1:07:47 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB37CA41502416HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
MID: <68f30cf4$1$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
You will notice that Snit is making an effort to redirect followups
in an effort to keep people from learning exactly what he actually
is.
This is a lie. A quotable lie.
No it's not a lie snit.
Nothing I've written about him is a lie.
There is no need to lie about snit because there is so much information
out there already which paints him in a less than honorable, honest way
and much of it has been posted by snit himself.
Obviously snit is attempting to fire up another trolling game.
The problem snit has is the Internet. It doesn't take long for others to
do a basic search on snit and discover the snit lists, the posting history of snit and the like. There are literally multitudes of people who have posted their experiences with snit and the majority seem to share similar, awful experiences with snit.
What are the odds of that happening?
so you have been at this troll circus thing for 30 years?
What the fuck is wrong with you snit?
visit some of the urls included and you can read all about him.
He's well known as a troll. A true fuckhead troll.
+1
Once he sets a good foot hold in COLA, they will be on the losing end.
He's a parasite. Some people will learn this the hard way as he works to
destroy that newsgroup. He will eventually do the same things he did in
alt.computer.workshop. If you visit alt.computer.workshop you can see
for yourself - the majority of the regulars will not interact with him
anymore. That's why he's so keen on setting up shop in your newsgroup.
Snit is the Typhoid Mary of USENET.
He is literally like vermin carrying the bubonic plague via fleas.
Everything snit comes in contact with withers and dies on the vine.
Ask the posters in comp.sys.mac.advocacy or talk.politics.guns, where I first encountered snit , what they think about him.
Snit is not well thought of or liked.
He's done so before but was eventually ran off. He's back for another
round because he's snowed several into responding to him.
your advice for others to ignore him and stay the fuck away is correct.
Unfortunately, it doesn't take many to ignore your advice and engage
with him. Once done, you are stuck with him for a while - As in years.
Yes.
If snit gains a foothold in a group, that group will be destroyed and that is because that is snit's motive and goal.
He's not interested in civil discussion and while he may on occasion
appear lucid it will be short lived.
He's like a german cockroach.
Yep.
The theory is the German cockroach will survive a nuclear war.
It doesn't surprise me at all.
As Archie Bunker used to say "God protects the dingbats" or something similar to that.
See here:
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/320HVQR4b90>
or here:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=snit+michael+glasser>
Sure doesn't back up snit's claims that's for sure.
He is very well known. It's best not to feed him. Those who do will
regret it. Those who didn't will also begin to have a disdain for those
who did feed him. Any interaction good or bad is enough to keep him
around. You won't want him sticking around for the 2nd time. Don't take
my word for it though, read some posts in alt.computer.workshop. In the
event the one I posted about him isn't good enough. He will work hard to
trash your newsgroup.
That's what snit counts on.
The archives are chock full of snit's various trolls.
All it takes is a single person feeding the snit and it's end of job.
And he will trash it. He will single out those of you who have some
technical knowledge and skill. When you don't accept him as one of you
(because he's a fucking tech moron) you'll regret it. Don't take my word
for it. See for yourself.
I find it interesting how snit attempts to blend in with those who have technical skills far superior to his and even when his errors are pointed out, he continues to make a fool of himself by doubling down on his faulty logic.
That alone is quite strange behavior.
On Oct 18, 2025 at 5:42:50 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB37CD2B694F83HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:Did you say something snit?
Charlie Glock <charlieglock@localhost.com>
news:68f415c2$2$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Sat, 18 Oct 2025
22:33:39 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2025 21:31:58 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin wrote:
nobody <nobody2u@hotmail.org>
news:XnsB37CAED391E79nobody2uhotmailorg@62.164.182.24 Sat, 18 Oct
2025 21:11:09 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:68f3f687$5$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Oct 18, 2025 at 1:07:47 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB37CA41502416HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
MID: <68f30cf4$1$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
You will notice that Snit is making an effort to redirect
followups in an effort to keep people from learning exactly what >>>>>>> he actually is.
This is a lie. A quotable lie.
No it's not a lie snit.
Nothing I've written about him is a lie.
There is no need to lie about snit because there is so much
information out there already which paints him in a less than
honorable, honest way and much of it has been posted by snit
himself.
It's especially funny that he's trying to lie about what is in his
own message headers:
If I lied why can't you QUOTE it? Why can't you show a MID?
Your lie is still above:
You will notice that Snit is making an effort to redirect
followups in an effort to keep people from learning exactly
what he actually is.
You lied. It is that simple.
From: Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Followup-To: alt.test
Subject: Re: Returning to the Dark Side
Date: 18 Oct 2025 03:43:48 GMT
Message-ID: <68f30cf4$1$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
See the Followup-To: ? LOL!!
He certainly did set that otherwise it wouldn't be in his own message
header.
Nobody said, suggested, hinted, or implied I did not set it. You are
running from your lie:
You will notice that Snit is making an effort to redirect
followups in an effort to keep people from learning exactly
what he actually is.
Pulling the MID verifies it's his post, his header and I didn't lie
about a damn thing.
Nobody
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,073 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 213:01:06 |
| Calls: | 13,782 |
| Files: | 186,987 |
| D/L today: |
38 files (4,791K bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,434,583 |