[Note: Followup-To: set to news.groups.proposals]
I'd like to open informal discussion around possibly creating a
new newsgroup, comp.lang.rust, for discussion of the Rust
programming language (https://rust-lang.org/).
[Note: Followup-To: set to news.groups.proposals]
I'd like to open informal discussion around possibly creating a
new newsgroup, comp.lang.rust, for discussion of the Rust
programming language (https://rust-lang.org/). Rust is a
compiled, type- and memory- safe language that has been in open
development since 2010, and is rapidly gaining adoption in
industry and research. It often comes up in discussions related
to C and C++, but no existing group is dedicated to it.
Thoughts?
- Dan C.
On 3/10/2025 6:46 AM, Dan Cross wrote:
[Note: Followup-To: set to news.groups.proposals]
I'd like to open informal discussion around possibly creating a
new newsgroup, comp.lang.rust, for discussion of the Rust
programming language (https://rust-lang.org/). Rust is a
compiled, type- and memory- safe language that has been in open
development since 2010, and is rapidly gaining adoption in
industry and research. It often comes up in discussions related
to C and C++, but no existing group is dedicated to it.
Thoughts?
- Dan C.
There is a newsgroup for rust already, alt.comp.lang.rust, that is not
very active at all. The reddit rust group is fairly active comparatively.
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/
Lynn
On 3/10/2025 6:46 AM, Dan Cross wrote:
[Note: Followup-To: set to news.groups.proposals]
I'd like to open informal discussion around possibly creating a
new newsgroup, comp.lang.rust, for discussion of the Rust
programming language (https://rust-lang.org/). Rust is a
compiled, type- and memory- safe language that has been in open
development since 2010, and is rapidly gaining adoption in
industry and research. It often comes up in discussions related
to C and C++, but no existing group is dedicated to it.
Thoughts?
- Dan C.
There is a newsgroup for rust already, alt.comp.lang.rust, that is not
very active at all. The reddit rust group is fairly active comparatively.
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/
On 3/10/2025 6:46 AM, Dan Cross wrote:
[Note: Followup-To: set to news.groups.proposals]
I'd like to open informal discussion around possibly creating a
new newsgroup, comp.lang.rust, for discussion of the Rust
programming language (https://rust-lang.org/). Rust is a
compiled, type- and memory- safe language that has been in open
development since 2010, and is rapidly gaining adoption in
industry and research. It often comes up in discussions related
to C and C++, but no existing group is dedicated to it.
Thoughts?
There is a newsgroup for rust already, alt.comp.lang.rust, that is not
very active at all.
The reddit rust group is fairly active comparatively.
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/
In article <vqq6gn$25i2t$1@dont-email.me>,
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/10/2025 6:46 AM, Dan Cross wrote:
[Note: Followup-To: set to news.groups.proposals]
I'd like to open informal discussion around possibly creating a
new newsgroup, comp.lang.rust, for discussion of the Rust
programming language (https://rust-lang.org/). Rust is a
compiled, type- and memory- safe language that has been in open
development since 2010, and is rapidly gaining adoption in
industry and research. It often comes up in discussions related
to C and C++, but no existing group is dedicated to it.
Thoughts?
There is a newsgroup for rust already, alt.comp.lang.rust, that is not
very active at all.
Hmm, I didn't know about that until it came up in this
discussion: my provider doesn't seem to carry it.
The reddit rust group is fairly active comparatively.
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/
It is. That, and Zulip, are the main ways that folks in the
community communicate. Neither is USENET, however.
- Dan C.
On 3/11/2025 5:31 PM, Dan Cross wrote:
In article <vqq6gn$25i2t$1@dont-email.me>,
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/10/2025 6:46 AM, Dan Cross wrote:
[Note: Followup-To: set to news.groups.proposals]
I'd like to open informal discussion around possibly creating a
new newsgroup, comp.lang.rust, for discussion of the Rust
programming language (https://rust-lang.org/). Rust is a
compiled, type- and memory- safe language that has been in open
development since 2010, and is rapidly gaining adoption in
industry and research. It often comes up in discussions related
to C and C++, but no existing group is dedicated to it.
Thoughts?
There is a newsgroup for rust already, alt.comp.lang.rust, that is not
very active at all.
Hmm, I didn't know about that until it came up in this
discussion: my provider doesn't seem to carry it.
The reddit rust group is fairly active comparatively.
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/
It is. That, and Zulip, are the main ways that folks in the
community communicate. Neither is USENET, however.
News.eternal-september.org carries the alt.* groups.
In article <vqr2in$2ek3p$2@dont-email.me>,
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/11/2025 5:31 PM, Dan Cross wrote:
In article <vqq6gn$25i2t$1@dont-email.me>,
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/10/2025 6:46 AM, Dan Cross wrote:
[Note: Followup-To: set to news.groups.proposals]
I'd like to open informal discussion around possibly creating a
new newsgroup, comp.lang.rust, for discussion of the Rust
programming language (https://rust-lang.org/). Rust is a
compiled, type- and memory- safe language that has been in open
development since 2010, and is rapidly gaining adoption in
industry and research. It often comes up in discussions related
to C and C++, but no existing group is dedicated to it.
Thoughts?
There is a newsgroup for rust already, alt.comp.lang.rust, that is not >>>> very active at all.
Hmm, I didn't know about that until it came up in this
discussion: my provider doesn't seem to carry it.
The reddit rust group is fairly active comparatively.
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/
It is. That, and Zulip, are the main ways that folks in the
community communicate. Neither is USENET, however.
News.eternal-september.org carries the alt.* groups.
That's only one, of many, servers and not everyone uses it; I
don't, for example. And as I said, my provider doesn't carry
that group, despite carrying some of alt.*.
It occurs to me that the existence of alt groups for similar
topics is a weak reason not to create a big 8 group, because of
the more limited reach.
- Dan C.
Sysop: | DaiTengu |
---|---|
Location: | Appleton, WI |
Users: | 1,029 |
Nodes: | 10 (2 / 8) |
Uptime: | 181:25:00 |
Calls: | 13,337 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 186,574 |
D/L today: |
5,241 files (1,443M bytes) |
Messages: | 3,356,580 |