Op 04.mrt.2025 om 15:17 schreef olcott:
On 3/4/2025 3:14 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:And that is exactly what Olcott does not show.
Op 04.mrt.2025 om 04:07 schreef olcott:
int DD()I wonder why Olcott keeps repeating that HHH fails to reach the 'ret'
{
int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
if (Halt_Status)
HERE: goto HERE;
return Halt_Status;
}
_DD()
[00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
[00002134] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
[00002136] 51 push ecx ; make space for local >>>> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
[0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
[00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04
[00002144] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax
[00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
[0000214b] 7402 jz 0000214f
[0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d
[0000214f] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04]
[00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp
[00002154] 5d pop ebp
[00002155] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]
DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly
reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.
instruction, where the direct execution or world-class simulators
have no problem to reach the 'ret' instruction of exactly the same
finite string as input.
The only valid rebuttal is to show all of the steps of
exactly how DD correctly emulated by HHH reaches its
own "ret" instruction.
So, my claim remains: HHH fails to reach the 'ret' instruction, where
the direct execution and some world-class simulators have no problem to reach it.
Sysop: | DaiTengu |
---|---|
Location: | Appleton, WI |
Users: | 1,029 |
Nodes: | 10 (1 / 9) |
Uptime: | 182:01:53 |
Calls: | 13,337 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 186,574 |
D/L today: |
5,391 files (1,494M bytes) |
Messages: | 3,356,597 |