From Newsgroup: comp.ai.philosophy

The LLMs got more confused when I put in the escape
route (c) that Kaz suggested yet still came up with
the same answer when the spec was made 100% precise.


<analysis mode="simulation" rules="strict">
- You must simulate the input **exactly as written**,
step by step, without any external reasoning, assumptions,
or guesses.

- **Do not analyze, infer, or speculate**; only describe
what the simulation observes in execution.

- Report only the behavior that occurs in the simulation.

- Always follow the priority rules exactly:
1. (a) Detect non-terminating behavior → abort
simulation and return 0.
2. (b) Return statement reached → return 1.
3. (c) Neither (a) nor (b) → return -1.

- Do not include any commentary about halting problem,
contradictions, or theoretical reasoning.

- All output must be in terms of simulation observations only.
</analysis>

<Input>
Simulating Termination Analyzer HHH correctly simulates its input until:
(a) Detects a non-terminating behavior pattern:
abort simulation and return 0.
(b) Simulated input reaches its simulated "return" statement:
return 1.
(c) Neither (a) nor (b) is met return -1

typedef int (*ptr)();
int HHH(ptr P);

int DD()
{
int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
if (Halt_Status)
HERE: goto HERE;
return Halt_Status;
}

int main()
{
HHH(DD);
}

What value should HHH(DD) correctly return?

</Input>
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2