From Newsgroup: comp.ai.philosophy

On 8/3/2025 2:30 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-08-02 13:33:04 +0000, olcott said:

On 8/2/2025 2:43 AM, Mikko wrote:

When you make a claim about "DDD simulated by HHH" you apparently
don't know what the words mean. The DDD simulated by HHH is the
same as DDD executed directly and it specifies the same behaviour
no matter how you call it.

Counter factual

Appearances can be false or misleading. However, in absense of contrary information, being true is more likely.

There is no likely or unlikely to Boolean expressions.
there is only true or false.

_DDD()
[00002192] 55 push ebp
[00002193] 8bec mov ebp,esp
[00002195] 6892210000 push 00002192 // push DDD
[0000219a] e833f4ffff call 000015d2 // call HHH
[0000219f] 83c404 add esp,+04
[000021a2] 5d pop ebp
[000021a3] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [000021a3]

When DDD is correctly emulated by HHH the definition
of the x86 language specifies that the correctly
emulated DDD cannot possibly ever reach past its own
machine address of [0000219a].

You can either comprehend this or fail to comprehend
this. Disagreement is inherently incorrect.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.ai.philosophy

On 8/3/25 9:44 AM, olcott wrote:

On 8/3/2025 2:30 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-08-02 13:33:04 +0000, olcott said:

On 8/2/2025 2:43 AM, Mikko wrote:

When you make a claim about "DDD simulated by HHH" you apparently
don't know what the words mean. The DDD simulated by HHH is the
same as DDD executed directly and it specifies the same behaviour
no matter how you call it.

Counter factual

Appearances can be false or misleading. However, in absense of contrary
information, being true is more likely.

There is no likely or unlikely to Boolean expressions.
there is only true or false.

_DDD()
[00002192] 55         push ebp
[00002193] 8bec       mov ebp,esp
[00002195] 6892210000 push 00002192  // push DDD
[0000219a] e833f4ffff call 000015d2  // call HHH
[0000219f] 83c404     add esp,+04
[000021a2] 5d         pop ebp
[000021a3] c3         ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [000021a3]

When DDD is correctly emulated by HHH the definition
of the x86 language specifies that the correctly
emulated DDD cannot possibly ever reach past its own
machine address of [0000219a].

Which isn't a true statement for your HHH, as it doesn;t correctly
emulate its DDD.

You can either comprehend this or fail to comprehend
this. Disagreement is inherently incorrect.

Since it is a lie, what is to comprehend?

Your problem is you try to decive people with wrong defintions.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2