@MSGID: 1:153/7001 583106b7
-={ 2016-11-20 02:13:11.216738384+00:00 }=-
Hey Fearless!
This should be an old school fidonet msg with an interesting twist ...
or so the story goes. If it works out and finds it's way past any
and all {cripple,abandon}ware between here and here then there should
be a space at the end of the so-called end of lines except where we actually want an end of line and in that case there should be no
space.
Here is a second paragraph ... or is and will be a second paragraph to
a text editor that is capable of proper word wrapping.
We shall soon see.
Life is good,
Maurice
... Don't cry for me I have vi.
--- GNU bash, version 4.4.0(1)-release (x86_64-silvermont-linux-gnu)
* Origin: Little Mikey's Brain - Ladysmith BC, Canada (1:153/7001) SEEN-BY: 123/500 153/7001 154/10 30 700 203/0 221/6 227/201 280/464 340/800
@PATH: 154/10
Are you hard wrapping in this original message?
The one you are replying to yes. I thought I'd try it to see if I recieved it with the special spaces intact at this end. Unfortunetly
it never made it and is still MIA along with many others. :-/
Anyhow I don't think it is you that is causing the oddball hard wraps
I see in the messages that do make it through. Beats me where it is happening and I am giving up trying to figure out a proper 'fix' for
it.
For the record this reply is via the 'normal' channel and isn't being wrapped. All paragraphs are unbounded as per specs for packed
messages.
@PATH: 153/7001 7715 250 770/1 280/464 154/10
This one arrived here hardwrapped.
This one arrived here hardwrapped.
Yep. I double checked the original and it is unwrapped as it should
be. It is being altered somewhere in between here and there. :-/
@MSGID: 1:153/7001.0@fidonet 5831cbbarecieved
@REPLY: 1:154/10 5831c532
-={ 2016-11-20 10:13:46.072466282-06:00 }=-
Hey Nicholas!
Are you hard wrapping in this original message?
The one you are replying to yes. I thought I'd try it to see if I
it with the special spaces intact at this end. Unfortunetly it never made it and is still MIA along with many others. :-/
Anyhow I don't think it is you that is causing the oddball hard wraps
I see in the messages that do make it through. Beats me where it is happening and I am giving up trying to figure out a proper 'fix' for
it.
For the record this reply is via the 'normal' channel and isn't being wrapped. All paragraphs are unbounded as per specs for packed messages.
Life is good,
Maurice
... Wiþ swiþe mænige biternesse is gemenged seo swetnes þisse worulde.
With much bitterness is mingled the sweetness of this world.
--- GNU bash, version 4.4.0(1)-release (x86_64-atom-linux-gnu)
* Origin: Little Mikey's Brain - Ladysmith BC, Canada (1:153/7001) SEEN-BY: 1/10 146 11/0 1 25/8 57/0 1 73/0 1 100/200 111/1 120/229 301 323 SEEN-BY: 120/419 481 544 545 546 640 123/57 500 130/505 153/250 154/10 199/0
SEEN-BY: 199/1 200/1 203/0 220/10 226/70 301 350 227/51 60 400 240/1661 SEEN-BY: 249/303 250/3 280/464 5003 310/31 317/2 340/200 352/0 3 393/68 SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/0 1 100 340 772/0 1 777/7 863/100 101 902/508 2215/15 SEEN-BY: 2215/300 2320/100 3634/12 15 22 24 27 50 4975/301 5075/35
@PATH: 153/7001 7715 250 770/1 280/464 227/51 120/544 3634/15 12
I mentioned elsewhere who the culprits most likely are
something in the path below wrapped it in transmission
Sysop: | DaiTengu |
---|---|
Location: | Appleton, WI |
Users: | 994 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 97:10:19 |
Calls: | 13,016 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 186,574 |
Messages: | 3,282,095 |