/lib/libc.so.6 | awk '{print " /lib/libc.so.6> " $0}'
In conclusion, gawk is good.
In conclusion, gawk is good.
so why use awk ? :=)
Besides gawk is GNU and is vastly superior to mawk.
What is gentoo's default awk?
Why would one have libc flagged executable?
zsh/2 1208 % ll /lib/libc.so.7
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1959392 6 Apr. 09:30 /lib/libc.so.7
HISTORY
An awk utility appeared in Version�7 AT&T UNIX.
So why bother about GNU residues at all? ;-)
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1959392 6 Apr. 09:30 /lib/libc.so.7
What's your point? I see no output that would lead me to believe
that /lib/libc.so.7 is worthy of running on any machine here whereas
the output of /lib/libc.so.6 tells much of what is under the hood ...
and it is the good stuff. Definetly GNU.
HISTORY
An awk utility appeared in Version´+¢7 AT&T UNIX.
That was a long time ago. I am betting it preceded both mawk and
gawk.
So why bother about GNU residues at all? ;-)
I favour them and they've been good to me over the years, including
gawk. I've never used, nor ever seen, AT&T UNIX's awk. How about
you?
My point would be that nothing should be flagged executable that
doesn't need to be executable.
I've never used, nor ever seen, AT&T UNIX's awk. How about you?
Nah, I'm not /that/ old. ;-)
However, FreeBSD comes with nawk.
gawk just doesn't feature the proper license, I guess...
https://github.com/onetrueawk/awk
Sysop: | DaiTengu |
---|---|
Location: | Appleton, WI |
Users: | 991 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 119:55:50 |
Calls: | 12,958 |
Files: | 186,574 |
Messages: | 3,265,641 |