• Why post to alt.tv.simpsons in 2017?

    From nicholas.deleon@1:2320/100 to alt.tv.simpsons on Fri May 26 13:14:42 2017
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.simpsons

    Hello everyone,
    My name is Nicholas Deleon and I'm an editor at Motherboard, Vice Media's science and technology website based in New York.
    I'm currently working on a story about Usenet text discussion groups and the motivations to still use them in 2017 (as opposed to other platforms like Facebook, Twitter, etc.) I used to lurk here when I was a kid in the early 2000s and I was pretty surprised to see that there's still an active community.
    Would anyone be will to speak to chat in the next couple days (can be via email, Skype, etc.) about why they continue to post here? What are the draws to
    Usenet versus other platforms? Does it improve the level of discourse that the group is a little off the beaten path, so to speak?
    I can be reached by email at nicholas.deleon@vice.com if anyone would like to get in touch.
    Thanks!
    -Nicholas

    SEEN-BY: 2320/105 154/30 2320/100 0 1 227/0
  • From ANTant@1:2320/100 to alt.tv.simpsons on Fri May 26 23:42:50 2017
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.simpsons

    FOr me, I am old school. :)


    nicholas.deleon@vice.com wrote:
    Hello everyone,

    My name is Nicholas Deleon and I'm an editor at Motherboard, Vice Media's
    science and technology website based in New York.

    I'm currently working on a story about Usenet text discussion groups and the
    motivations to still use them in 2017 (as opposed to other platforms like Facebook, Twitter, etc.) I used to lurk here when I was a kid in the early 2000s and I was pretty surprised to see that there's still an active community.
    Would anyone be will to speak to chat in the next couple days (can be via email, Skype, etc.) about why they continue to post here? What are the draws to
    Usenet versus other platforms? Does it improve the level of discourse that the group is a little off the beaten path, so to speak?

    I can be reached by email at nicholas.deleon@vice.com if anyone would like to
    get in touch.

    Thanks!

    -Nicholas

    --
    Quote of the Week: "In every enemy that is an ant, behold an elephant." --Turkish
    Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
    /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org (Personal Web Site)
    / /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
    | |o o| |
    \ _ / Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail privately. If credit-
    ( ) ing, then please kindly use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.

    SEEN-BY: 2320/105 154/30 2320/100 0 1 227/0
  • From Travoltron@1:2320/100 to alt.tv.simpsons on Tue Jun 6 18:40:03 2017
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.simpsons

    We like our freedom of speech here.
    We don't want it stifled by some snowflake mod that gets triggered by
    anything he doesn't agree with and bans everyone.

    By the way, VICE sucks. Both the website and the TV channel. You should probably look for another job before it goes under like Al-Jazeera
    America did.

    SEEN-BY: 2320/105 154/30 2320/100 0 1 227/0
  • From simpspin@1:2320/100 to alt.tv.simpsons on Sat Jun 10 20:07:08 2017
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.simpsons

    On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 3:14:42 PM UTC-5, nichola...@vice.com wrote:
    Hello everyone,

    My name is Nicholas Deleon and I'm an editor at Motherboard, Vice Media's
    science and technology website based in New York.

    I'm currently working on a story about Usenet text discussion groups and the
    motivations to still use them in 2017 (as opposed to other platforms like Facebook, Twitter, etc.) I used to lurk here when I was a kid in the early 2000s and I was pretty surprised to see that there's still an active community.
    Would anyone be will to speak to chat in the next couple days (can be via email, Skype, etc.) about why they continue to post here? What are the draws to
    Usenet versus other platforms? Does it improve the level of discourse that the group is a little off the beaten path, so to speak?

    I can be reached by email at nicholas.deleon@vice.com if anyone would like to
    get in touch.

    Thanks!

    -Nicholas
    I used to post here from 1997 till about 2003. I loved all the Ultra-Nerdiness
    that lingered until it became mainstream to be a nerd.

    SEEN-BY: 2320/105 154/30 2320/100 0 1 227/0
  • From rdent@1:2320/100 to alt.tv.simpsons on Mon Sep 18 22:25:49 2017
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.simpsons

    On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 4:14:42 PM UTC-4, nichola...@vice.com wrote:
    Hello everyone,

    My name is Nicholas Deleon and I'm an editor at Motherboard, Vice Media's
    science and technology website based in New York.

    I'm currently working on a story about Usenet text discussion groups and the
    motivations to still use them in 2017 (as opposed to other platforms like Facebook, Twitter, etc.) I used to lurk here when I was a kid in the early 2000s and I was pretty surprised to see that there's still an active community.
    Would anyone be will to speak to chat in the next couple days (can be via email, Skype, etc.) about why they continue to post here? What are the draws to
    Usenet versus other platforms? Does it improve the level of discourse that the group is a little off the beaten path, so to speak?

    I can be reached by email at nicholas.deleon@vice.com if anyone would like to
    get in touch.

    Thanks!

    -Nicholas
    I think it's kinda funny and ironic to post on such an outdated forum.
    But above all, something about it feels very cozy and nostalgic. I wasn't even born until 96, long after this place started, but something about it still feels...right.

    SEEN-BY: 2320/105 154/30 2320/100 0 1 227/0
  • From Theodore Heise@1:2320/100 to alt.tv.simpsons on Mon Sep 25 18:38:00 2017
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.simpsons

    On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 22:25:49 -0700 (PDT),
    rdent@purdue.edu <rdent@purdue.edu> wrote:
    On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 4:14:42 PM UTC-4, nichola...@vice.com wrote:
    Hello everyone,

    My name is Nicholas Deleon and I'm an editor at Motherboard,
    Vice Media's science and technology website based in New York.

    I'm currently working on a story about Usenet text discussion
    groups and the motivations to still use them in 2017 (as
    opposed to other platforms like Facebook, Twitter, etc.) I
    used to lurk here when I was a kid in the early 2000s and I
    was pretty surprised to see that there's still an active
    community. Would anyone be will to speak to chat in the next
    couple days (can be via email, Skype, etc.) about why they
    continue to post here? What are the draws to Usenet versus
    other platforms? Does it improve the level of discourse that
    the group is a little off the beaten path, so to speak?

    I can be reached by email at nicholas.deleon@vice.com if
    anyone would like to get in touch.

    Thanks!

    -Nicholas

    I think it's kinda funny and ironic to post on such an outdated
    forum.

    But above all, something about it feels very cozy and
    nostalgic. I wasn't even born until 96, long after this place
    started, but something about it still feels...right.

    The original post doesn't seem to be available on the news server
    I use, so I'm following up to the followup from rdent.

    Assuming you are still working on the story (which seems
    doubtful), here are a few more thoughts.

    You will probably find that folks on Usenet trend old, as many
    (most?) came to it when there were few other options and have been
    here for quite some time. For me, I like the text based format,
    the fact that the topics are very specialized, and the lightweight
    nature of the medium (no heavy webpages to load).

    The threading capabilities that most good newsreaders have, as
    well as the ability to highlight (or kill) certain threads and/or
    posters are also nice aspects of the medium. It's pretty easy to
    walk the thread in any direction to zero in on specific posts.

    For me, I use old command line UNIX programs for both e-mail and
    news (Pine and slrn) and they have the capability of storing
    messages in the same format and archive. So I can mix news and
    e-mail in common directory structures.

    --
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> Bloomington, IN, USA

    SEEN-BY: 2320/105 154/30 2320/100 0 1 227/0