• "The Simpsons" entire series to marathon again on FXX

    From David@1:2320/100 to rec.arts.tv,alt.tv.simpsons on Thu Sep 22 18:02:53 2016
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.simpsons

    EVERY. SIMPSONS. EVER. (PART 2!)

    FXX TO AIR LONGEST RUNNING MARATHON IN TV HISTORY

    600 EPISODES. 300 HOURS. 13 DAYS.

    Marathon Begins at 12:00 PM ET on Thanksgiving Day, November 24th and
    Concludes at Midnight ET on December 6th

    FOX TO DEBUT ALL-NEW SEASON 28 PREMIERE OF THE SIMPSONS THIS SUNDAY,
    SEPTEMBER 25 AT 8:00 PM E/P

    Emmy Award(R)-Winning Multi-Hyphenate Amy Schumer Guest-Voices on the
    FOX Season Premiere

    LOS ANGELES, September 22, 2016 - America's holiday season kicks off
    on Thanksgiving Day with the longest marathon in television history:
    FXX's 600 episodes, 300 hour, 13-day run of every episode of TV's
    longest running hit series, The Simpsons. The 27-season marathon
    begins at 12:00 PM ET on Thursday, November 24th and ends on
    Wednesday, December 6th at midnight ET - all 600 episodes airing in chronological order over those 13 days.

    The upcoming Simpsons marathon will become the longest-running
    marathon in television history, surpassing the previous record holder,
    FXX's 552-episode, 12-day Simpsons marathon, which ran from August 21,
    2014 at 10 AM to September 1 at midnight. That marathon propelled the
    nascent FXX to cable's #1-ranked network primetime in Adults 18-49 and
    Adults 18-34 for 12 consecutive days.

    FX Networks President and COO Chuck Saftler said, "The first 'Every.
    Simpsons. Ever.' Marathon was truly so special and landmark in its
    cultural relevance and impact. The unprecedented feat of reaching 600
    episodes deserves something of that caliber to mark it and celebrate
    it. Doing this is an act of true fandom, honoring Jim Brooks, Matt
    Groening, Al Jean, all the writers, artists, directors, people behind
    the scenes and the ridiculously talented voice actors who have brought
    this series to life and kept it at the pinnacle of artistic excellence
    these past 27+ seasons."

    FOX will debut the show's record 28th season this Sunday, September
    25th at 8:00 PM ET/PT, with the premiere episode featuring Amy Schumer
    as the featured guest-voice. In the episode, when Springfield is
    burned to the ground, the Simpsons beg Mr. Burns to fund its
    rebuilding. Burns agrees - with one condition: he gets to put on a
    variety show at the Springfield Bowl, on the all-new "Monty Burns'
    Fleeing Circus."

    FXX is the cable network home for all seasons of The Simpsons,
    excluding seasons airing in their first run on FOX. FX Networks' app,
    FXNOW, is the exclusive non-linear home for all seasons of The
    Simpsons, excluding seasons airing in their first run on FOX.

    FXX's "Simpsons World" is the ultimate Simpsons digital experience
    featuring enriched branded content through SimpsonsWorld.com and handheld/connected devices via FXNOW, the authenticated multi-network
    on-demand video service supporting FX, FXX and FXM.

    SEEN-BY: 2320/105 154/30 2320/100 0 1 227/0
  • From garfielf321@1:2320/100 to alt.tv.simpsons on Thu Sep 22 18:15:15 2016
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.simpsons

    I can catch up on the episodes I missed the first time they did it

    SEEN-BY: 2320/105 154/30 2320/100 0 1 227/0
  • From garfielf321@1:2320/100 to alt.tv.simpsons on Thu Sep 22 18:17:24 2016
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.simpsons

    I can catch up on the episodes I missed the first time they did it.

    SEEN-BY: 2320/105 154/30 2320/100 0 1 227/0
  • From Vidcapper@1:2320/100 to alt.tv.simpsons on Fri Sep 23 07:17:28 2016
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.simpsons

    On 23/09/2016 02:15, garfielf321@gmail.com wrote:
    I can catch up on the episodes I missed the first time they did it


    I'd rather they'd just put the 'missing' episodes on DVD/Blu-Ray...

    --

    Paul Hyett, Cheltenham

    SEEN-BY: 2320/105 154/30 2320/100 0 1 227/0
  • From Keith F. Lynch@1:2320/100 to alt.tv.simpsons on Sat Sep 24 16:53:45 2016
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.simpsons

    Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
    garfielf321@gmail.com wrote:
    I can catch up on the episodes I missed the first time they did it

    I'd rather they'd just put the 'missing' episodes on DVD/Blu-Ray...

    Likewise. Why should I pay for cable every month whether I watch it
    or not when I can pay for a set of DVDs just once and have them for
    a lifetime?

    I'm old enough to remember when the selling point of cable was that
    there would be no commercials. From what little I've seen of cable,
    it has just as many commercials as free over-the-air broadcast TV.
    And since 600 episodes take 300 hours rather than 200, that's
    certainly the case with FFX.

    I also remember when commercials took six minutes of every hour. Now
    they take about twenty minutes.

    Do they plan to resume producing DVDs after the whole series is over?
    Even if only by underhandedly offering them only as a package deal --
    pay for *all* the episodes even if you already have most of them?
    --
    Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
    Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.

    SEEN-BY: 2320/105 154/30 2320/100 0 1 227/0
  • From Vidcapper@1:2320/100 to alt.tv.simpsons on Sun Sep 25 08:15:57 2016
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.simpsons

    On 24/09/2016 17:53, Keith F. Lynch wrote:

    Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
    garfielf321@gmail.com wrote:
    I can catch up on the episodes I missed the first time they did it

    I'd rather they'd just put the 'missing' episodes on DVD/Blu-Ray...

    Likewise. Why should I pay for cable every month whether I watch it
    or not when I can pay for a set of DVDs just once and have them for
    a lifetime?

    IMO, there should be immunity from copyright infringement, where the
    producers of a show refuse to make it available to legally purchase...



    --

    Paul Hyett, Cheltenham

    SEEN-BY: 2320/105 154/30 2320/100 0 1 227/0
  • From Je▀us@1:2320/100 to alt.tv.simpsons on Tue Sep 27 17:01:53 2016
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.simpsons

    On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 08:15:57 +0100, Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk>
    wrote:

    On 24/09/2016 17:53, Keith F. Lynch wrote:

    Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
    garfielf321@gmail.com wrote:
    I can catch up on the episodes I missed the first time they did it

    I'd rather they'd just put the 'missing' episodes on DVD/Blu-Ray...

    Likewise. Why should I pay for cable every month whether I watch it
    or not when I can pay for a set of DVDs just once and have them for
    a lifetime?

    IMO, there should be immunity from copyright infringement, where the >producers of a show refuse to make it available to legally purchase...

    That makes no sense. Should a car manufacturer that builds a concept
    car then be forced to build it because some arse-clown wants to buy
    one?

    SEEN-BY: 2320/105 154/30 2320/100 0 1 227/0
  • From Je▀us@1:2320/100 to alt.tv.simpsons on Tue Sep 27 17:02:27 2016
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.simpsons

    On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:17:24 -0700 (PDT), garfielf321@gmail.com wrote:

    I can catch up on the episodes I missed the first time they did it.

    Yes... We got your memo the first 1600 times.

    SEEN-BY: 2320/105 154/30 2320/100 0 1 227/0
  • From Michael Black@1:2320/100 to alt.tv.simpsons on Tue Sep 27 09:55:27 2016
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.simpsons

    On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, Je?us wrote:

    On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 08:15:57 +0100, Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk>
    wrote:

    On 24/09/2016 17:53, Keith F. Lynch wrote:

    Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
    garfielf321@gmail.com wrote:
    I can catch up on the episodes I missed the first time they did it

    I'd rather they'd just put the 'missing' episodes on DVD/Blu-Ray...

    Likewise. Why should I pay for cable every month whether I watch it
    or not when I can pay for a set of DVDs just once and have them for
    a lifetime?

    IMO, there should be immunity from copyright infringement, where the
    producers of a show refuse to make it available to legally purchase...

    That makes no sense. Should a car manufacturer that builds a concept
    car then be forced to build it because some arse-clown wants to buy
    one?

    I think you'd want to ask Homer that.

    Michael

    SEEN-BY: 2320/105 154/30 2320/100 0 1 227/0
  • From Michael Black@1:2320/100 to alt.tv.simpsons on Tue Sep 27 09:55:51 2016
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.simpsons

    On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, Je?us wrote:

    On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:17:24 -0700 (PDT), garfielf321@gmail.com wrote:

    I can catch up on the episodes I missed the first time they did it.

    Yes... We got your memo the first 1600 times.

    He's being punished, told to write the same line 1000 times.

    Michael

    SEEN-BY: 2320/105 154/30 2320/100 0 1 227/0
  • From Vidcapper@1:2320/100 to alt.tv.simpsons on Tue Sep 27 17:30:58 2016
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.simpsons

    On 27/09/2016 08:01, JeN++us wrote:
    On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 08:15:57 +0100, Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk>
    wrote:

    On 24/09/2016 17:53, Keith F. Lynch wrote:

    Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
    garfielf321@gmail.com wrote:
    I can catch up on the episodes I missed the first time they did it

    I'd rather they'd just put the 'missing' episodes on DVD/Blu-Ray...

    Likewise. Why should I pay for cable every month whether I watch it
    or not when I can pay for a set of DVDs just once and have them for
    a lifetime?

    IMO, there should be immunity from copyright infringement, where the
    producers of a show refuse to make it available to legally purchase...

    That makes no sense. Should a car manufacturer that builds a concept
    car then be forced to build it because some arse-clown wants to buy
    one?


    Are you familiar with the term 'reductio ad absurdum'? If not, I suggest
    you look it up.

    --

    Paul Hyett, Cheltenham

    SEEN-BY: 2320/105 154/30 2320/100 0 1 227/0
  • From Je▀us@1:2320/100 to alt.tv.simpsons on Fri Sep 30 11:55:03 2016
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.simpsons

    On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:55:27 -0400, Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca>
    wrote:

    On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, Je?us wrote:

    On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 08:15:57 +0100, Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk>
    wrote:

    On 24/09/2016 17:53, Keith F. Lynch wrote:

    Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
    garfielf321@gmail.com wrote:
    I can catch up on the episodes I missed the first time they did it

    I'd rather they'd just put the 'missing' episodes on DVD/Blu-Ray...

    Likewise. Why should I pay for cable every month whether I watch it
    or not when I can pay for a set of DVDs just once and have them for
    a lifetime?

    IMO, there should be immunity from copyright infringement, where the
    producers of a show refuse to make it available to legally purchase...

    That makes no sense. Should a car manufacturer that builds a concept
    car then be forced to build it because some arse-clown wants to buy
    one?

    I think you'd want to ask Homer that.

    Indeed.

    SEEN-BY: 2320/105 154/30 2320/100 0 1 227/0
  • From Je▀us@1:2320/100 to alt.tv.simpsons on Fri Sep 30 11:58:03 2016
    From Newsgroup: alt.tv.simpsons

    On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:30:58 +0100, Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk>
    wrote:

    On 27/09/2016 08:01, Je?us wrote:
    On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 08:15:57 +0100, Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk>
    wrote:

    On 24/09/2016 17:53, Keith F. Lynch wrote:

    Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
    garfielf321@gmail.com wrote:
    I can catch up on the episodes I missed the first time they did it

    I'd rather they'd just put the 'missing' episodes on DVD/Blu-Ray...

    Likewise. Why should I pay for cable every month whether I watch it
    or not when I can pay for a set of DVDs just once and have them for
    a lifetime?

    IMO, there should be immunity from copyright infringement, where the
    producers of a show refuse to make it available to legally purchase...

    That makes no sense. Should a car manufacturer that builds a concept
    car then be forced to build it because some arse-clown wants to buy
    one?


    Are you familiar with the term 'reductio ad absurdum'? If not, I suggest
    you look it up.

    I'm familiar with the concept of 'naughtius maximus'. Does that count?

    SEEN-BY: 2320/105 154/30 2320/100 0 1 227/0