Wilfred van Velzen wrote to Allen Prunty <=-
Now that you have read the entire message, please share comments.
Now that I have red your message it's clear to me, you look to fidonet with your experience from the distant past. Current fidonet is a very much different thing. For starters it's so much smaller than in it's hayday. Only 10% of the nodelist is left, and if you count active participants it's even smaller. Further more as almost all links use
the internet at zero cost, anyone can connect every where. So all this hierarchical structuring is mostly irrellevant, and moderators, where they still exist, have no real power at all. Just the mere existence of moderators frustrates the smooth operation of the network and seems to cause more aggrevation between the participants of an area.
Further: the north american backbone (not "the backbone" as you said), has made itself irrelevant since the fidonews coup, and the "genesis"
of the fidoweb as a concequence. So the elist because it isn't
recognized as being part of fidonet, and only part of Z1 uses it, is
even less relevant. It's mostly a mausoleum of dead areas anyway. There seem to be more areas than active users!
So let's do without a moderator and rules in this area, it has existed without it for more then 10 years now. The thought of having an
election is even more rediculous, it would only aggrevate things even more. No good will come of it and would be a waste of energy!
And mind you, I don't object to you trying to revive the area. But you can do that just as well without being the moderator. So put your
energy into that and drop the moderator nonsense...
Joacim Melin wrote to Allen Prunty <=-
1. Do we need a moderator?
2. If (1)=yes, why? Are there any Fidonet rules stipulating that every echo requires a moderator?
I run my BBS on a Amiga 2000 and it's still reasonably stable, offering
me tons of joy and entertainment and (sometimes) a bit of a headache. Surely, we can come together as users (or just fans) of the Amiga and
keep the discussion civilized? I'd rather not see this echo turn to FN_SYSOP...
Wilfred van Velzen wrote to Allen Prunty <=-
as long as the FN_SYSOP people kindly stay out of this and let us work
it out on our own. At first all I was going to do was the minimum to
keep it on the North American Backbone
You put way too much importance into the NAB. It only plays a minor
part in world wide echomail distribution.
between the first two Fido BBS systems, Jennings' and Madil's, to "see
if it could be done, merely for the fun of it". This was first
supported in Fido V7, "sometime in June 84 or so"
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FidoNet
You might also be well served to look at https://www.fidonet.org/
Sysop: | DaiTengu |
---|---|
Location: | Appleton, WI |
Users: | 1,007 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 161:43:30 |
Calls: | 13,142 |
Files: | 186,574 |
D/L today: |
2,864 files (1,447M bytes) |
Messages: | 3,309,357 |