• Re: Glassdoor meltdown as users urged to flee site after posters' real names added without permission

    From micky@NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.privacy,alt.privacy.anon-server,comp.mobile.android,misc.phone.mobile.iphone on Sun Apr 14 12:18:56 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

    In alt.comp.os.windows-10, on Thu, 21 Mar 2024 20:00:57 -0400, Alan
    Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:

    On 2024-03-20 16:07, Nomen Nescio wrote:

    Signing up for an account on Glassdoor required workers to reveal their
    full name, job title and employer — a departure from its previous practice >> of just requiring email addresses but no names, according to Wired.

    Seems like this opens them up to an enormous lawsuit for lost wages,
    health insurance, from up to hundreds of people.

    Why I use fake names, date of birth, anonymized e-mail addresses ...

    Me too.

    (I've never posted on Glassdoor, however).

    Me neither. I'm hoping to get a job someday.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From micky@NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.privacy,alt.privacy.anon-server,comp.mobile.android,misc.phone.mobile.iphone on Mon Apr 15 21:18:06 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

    In comp.mobile.android, on Mon, 15 Apr 2024 05:19:14 -0500, kelown <kelown@privacy.invalid> wrote:


    Signing up for an account on Glassdoor required workers to reveal their >>>> full name, job title and employer — a departure from its previous practice >>>> of just requiring email addresses but no names, according to Wired.

    Seems like this opens them up to an enormous lawsuit for lost wages,
    health insurance, from up to hundreds of people.

    Why I use fake names, date of birth, anonymized e-mail addresses ...

    If Glassdoor is asking for a full name and employer name during
    registration (for NEW accounts), why would there be a lawsuit if it's >revealed? How could it be "without permission" if the registrant gave
    them the info?

    Seriously? If the webpage said, "This info is only for our own records
    and will not be revealed"*, then when the webpage says that and the user
    signs up, a unilateral contract is created and the owners and staff of
    the webpage have to live by what they said on the webpage.

    **Often it will include, "except in response to a valid subpoena".
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From micky@NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.privacy,alt.privacy.anon-server,comp.mobile.android,misc.phone.mobile.iphone on Tue Apr 16 01:03:19 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

    In comp.mobile.android, on Mon, 15 Apr 2024 21:18:06 -0400, micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> wrote:

    In comp.mobile.android, on Mon, 15 Apr 2024 05:19:14 -0500, kelown ><kelown@privacy.invalid> wrote:


    Signing up for an account on Glassdoor required workers to reveal their >>>>> full name, job title and employer — a departure from its previous practice
    of just requiring email addresses but no names, according to Wired.

    Seems like this opens them up to an enormous lawsuit for lost wages,
    health insurance, from up to hundreds of people.

    Why I use fake names, date of birth, anonymized e-mail addresses ...

    If Glassdoor is asking for a full name and employer name during >>registration (for NEW accounts), why would there be a lawsuit if it's >>revealed? How could it be "without permission" if the registrant gave
    them the info?

    Seriously? If the webpage said, "This info is only for our own records
    and will not be revealed"*, then when the webpage says that and the user >signs up, a unilateral contract is created and the owners and staff of
    the webpage have to live by what they said on the webpage.

    **Often it will include, "except in response to a valid subpoena".

    I was looking at the Freedom Boat Club, and this what it says its
    privacy policy includes:

    Exceptions: HOWEVER, Brunswick may also share information with other
    third parties for the following purposes ONLY:

    To comply with applicable law or legal process (including to law enforcement authorities or other governmental officials)
    When necessary to protect the vital interests of a person (including
    to prevent physical harm, financial loss, and compliance with an
    investigation of legal/ethical activity)
    To enforce Brunswick policy and prevent fraud
    To protect our property, services, and legal rights
    In connection with a corporate merger, consolidation, restructuring,
    sale, or other corporate change
    https://www.brunswick.com/privacy-policy

    This is pretty vague, and many other privacy policies are stronger than
    this, but even this doesn't say they will release names because they've
    changed their mind. Still, "to enforce Brunswick policy" is really
    vague and non-comittal.

    And previously it said "BRUNSWICK DOES NOT SELL PERSONAL INFORMATION". I
    think that too is vague, ambiguous, or downright non-committal, because
    it doesn't say they will never sell it.

    I should go check out what glassdoor has promised. Or you could.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114